{"title":"ANALISIS TAX EFFORT DAERAH DI INDONESIA","authors":"Ade Aida, Dini Hariyanti, Sumiyarti","doi":"10.25105/me.v30i2.13818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted to analyze the effect of central government transfers on regional taxation efforts covering districts/cities in Indonesia in the 2015-2019 range after the enactment of Law Number 28 of 2009 concerning Regional Taxes and Regional Levie/ Pajak Daerah dan Retribusi Daerah (UU PDRD). This study uses a quantitative analysis approach, with an econometric model of panel data regression (unbalanced panel. The data used is in a span of 5 years, starting from 2015 to 2019 in regencies/cities in Indonesia except for cities in DKI Jakarta Province. The dependent variable used is Tax Effort is used, while the variables used in this study include General Allocation Fund/ Dana Alokasi Umum (DAU), Special Allocation Fund/ Dana Alokasi Khusus (DAK), Revenue Sharing Fund/ Dana Bagi Hasil (DBH), Population, Poor Population, and Administrative Status. Based on the results of panel data processing using regression analysis techniques, it shows that the central government transfer funds allocated to the regions through the General Allocation Fund (DAU) and the Special Allocation Fund (DAK) have a negative effect on tax effort, while the Revenue Sharing Fund (DBH) has a negative effect on tax effort. positive on regional tax effort. In addition, the results of the study also showed that the population had a negative effect on the tax effort, the number of poor people had a positive effect on the tax effort and administrative status which indicated whether the area was included in the status of a city or district area did not affect the regional tax effort. With the research results obtained, it can provide an overview of the behavior of local governments in responding to the mechanism of fiscal decentralization, especially with the many types and amounts of transfer funds to the regions, coupled with the transfer of authority to manage Rural and Urban Land and Building Taxes/ Pajak Bumi dan Bangunan Perdesaan dan Perkotaan (PBB P2) and Land Rights Acquisition Fees and Buildings/ Bea Perolehan Hak Atas Tanah dan Bangunan (BPHTB) become part of the district/city local government.","PeriodicalId":31924,"journal":{"name":"Media Ekonomi dan Manajemen","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media Ekonomi dan Manajemen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25105/me.v30i2.13818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study was conducted to analyze the effect of central government transfers on regional taxation efforts covering districts/cities in Indonesia in the 2015-2019 range after the enactment of Law Number 28 of 2009 concerning Regional Taxes and Regional Levie/ Pajak Daerah dan Retribusi Daerah (UU PDRD). This study uses a quantitative analysis approach, with an econometric model of panel data regression (unbalanced panel. The data used is in a span of 5 years, starting from 2015 to 2019 in regencies/cities in Indonesia except for cities in DKI Jakarta Province. The dependent variable used is Tax Effort is used, while the variables used in this study include General Allocation Fund/ Dana Alokasi Umum (DAU), Special Allocation Fund/ Dana Alokasi Khusus (DAK), Revenue Sharing Fund/ Dana Bagi Hasil (DBH), Population, Poor Population, and Administrative Status. Based on the results of panel data processing using regression analysis techniques, it shows that the central government transfer funds allocated to the regions through the General Allocation Fund (DAU) and the Special Allocation Fund (DAK) have a negative effect on tax effort, while the Revenue Sharing Fund (DBH) has a negative effect on tax effort. positive on regional tax effort. In addition, the results of the study also showed that the population had a negative effect on the tax effort, the number of poor people had a positive effect on the tax effort and administrative status which indicated whether the area was included in the status of a city or district area did not affect the regional tax effort. With the research results obtained, it can provide an overview of the behavior of local governments in responding to the mechanism of fiscal decentralization, especially with the many types and amounts of transfer funds to the regions, coupled with the transfer of authority to manage Rural and Urban Land and Building Taxes/ Pajak Bumi dan Bangunan Perdesaan dan Perkotaan (PBB P2) and Land Rights Acquisition Fees and Buildings/ Bea Perolehan Hak Atas Tanah dan Bangunan (BPHTB) become part of the district/city local government.
本研究旨在分析2009年关于区域税收和区域征税/ Pajak Daerah dan Retribusi Daerah (UU PDRD)的第28号法律颁布后,2015-2019年期间中央政府转移支付对印度尼西亚各区/市的区域税收工作的影响。本研究采用定量分析方法,采用面板数据回归(不平衡面板)的计量经济模型。使用的数据跨度为5年,从2015年到2019年,在印度尼西亚的县/城市,除了DKI雅加达省的城市。本研究使用的因变量为税收努力,变量包括一般分配基金/ Dana Alokasi Umum (DAU)、特别分配基金/ Dana Alokasi Khusus (DAK)、收入分享基金/ Dana Bagi Hasil (DBH)、人口、贫困人口和行政地位。利用回归分析技术对面板数据进行处理的结果表明,中央政府通过一般分配基金(DAU)和专项分配基金(DAK)向地方分配的转移支付资金对税收努力具有负向影响,而收入分成基金(DBH)对税收努力具有负向影响。对地区税收努力持积极态度。此外,研究结果还表明,人口对税收努力有负面影响,贫困人口数量对税收努力和行政地位有积极影响,这表明该地区是否被纳入城市或区区域的地位并不影响区域税收努力。通过所得的研究结果,可以对地方政府应对财政分权机制的行为,特别是在向地区转移资金种类和数额众多的情况下,提供一个概览。加上农村和城市土地和建筑税(Pajak Bumi dan Bangunan Perdesaan dan Perkotaan)管理权的转移,以及土地权利取得费和建筑物(Bea Perolehan Hak Atas Tanah dan Bangunan)成为地区/城市地方政府的一部分。