Visuospatial, rather than verbal working memory capacity plays a key role in verbal and figural creativity

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
R. Lu, Yanna Zhang, Naili Bao, Meng Su, Xingli Zhang, Jiannong Shi
{"title":"Visuospatial, rather than verbal working memory capacity plays a key role in verbal and figural creativity","authors":"R. Lu, Yanna Zhang, Naili Bao, Meng Su, Xingli Zhang, Jiannong Shi","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2021.1911848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Creative idea generation engages complex cognitive functions such as working memory capacity (WMC). The relationship between creativity and WMC has remained inconsistent due to the lack of experimental evidence and the mismatching of WMC tasks and creativity measurements. Therefore, we used both measurements and experiments to explore the effects of WMC on creativity with the matching of task types considered. In Study 1, we conducted multiple measurements to explore the relationship between verbal/visuospatial WMC and verbal/figural creativity and found that participants with higher visuospatial WMC performed better in both types of creativity tasks. Furthermore, we conducted two dual task experiments in Study 2 to explore the causal effects of WMC on creativity. We found only interfering with participants’ visuospatial WMC would significantly decrease their creative performances. Moreover, Study 3 ruled out the potential confounding factor of general attention resources in the visuospatial secondary tasks by using a control dual task experiment. These findings indicated that the creative thinking process is likely to rely on visuospatial processing regardless of the form of the presented information.","PeriodicalId":47270,"journal":{"name":"Thinking & Reasoning","volume":"19 1","pages":"29 - 60"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking & Reasoning","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2021.1911848","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract Creative idea generation engages complex cognitive functions such as working memory capacity (WMC). The relationship between creativity and WMC has remained inconsistent due to the lack of experimental evidence and the mismatching of WMC tasks and creativity measurements. Therefore, we used both measurements and experiments to explore the effects of WMC on creativity with the matching of task types considered. In Study 1, we conducted multiple measurements to explore the relationship between verbal/visuospatial WMC and verbal/figural creativity and found that participants with higher visuospatial WMC performed better in both types of creativity tasks. Furthermore, we conducted two dual task experiments in Study 2 to explore the causal effects of WMC on creativity. We found only interfering with participants’ visuospatial WMC would significantly decrease their creative performances. Moreover, Study 3 ruled out the potential confounding factor of general attention resources in the visuospatial secondary tasks by using a control dual task experiment. These findings indicated that the creative thinking process is likely to rely on visuospatial processing regardless of the form of the presented information.
视觉空间工作记忆能力,而不是语言工作记忆能力,在语言和图形创造力中起着关键作用
创意的产生涉及复杂的认知功能,如工作记忆容量(WMC)。由于缺乏实验证据以及WMC任务与创造力测量的不匹配,创造力与WMC之间的关系一直不一致。因此,我们采用测量和实验相结合的方法,在考虑任务类型匹配的情况下,探讨WMC对创造力的影响。在研究1中,我们通过多个测量来探索言语/视觉空间WMC与言语/图形创造力之间的关系,发现高视觉空间WMC的参与者在两种类型的创造力任务中都表现得更好。此外,我们在研究2中进行了两个双任务实验来探讨WMC对创造力的因果关系。我们发现只有干扰参与者的视觉空间WMC才能显著降低他们的创造性表现。此外,研究3通过对照双任务实验排除了视觉空间次要任务中一般注意资源的潜在干扰因素。这些发现表明,创造性思维过程可能依赖于视觉空间处理,而不管呈现信息的形式如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thinking & Reasoning
Thinking & Reasoning PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信