Assessing subjective burden and quality of life in family caregivers of older adults

P. Wachholz, Patricia Ribeiro Mattar Damiance
{"title":"Assessing subjective burden and quality of life in family caregivers of older adults","authors":"P. Wachholz, Patricia Ribeiro Mattar Damiance","doi":"10.5327/z2447-212320212000072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: To evaluate subjective burden and perceived quality of life in primary caregivers who care for older adults at home. Caregivers were followed up in a pilot support group. The study also sought to describe the experience of encouraging dialogue and interaction within this group. METHODS: This quanti-qualitative study was limited to nine family caregivers. Data were collected using the following instruments: the World Health Organization Quality of Life abbreviated version, the Zarit caregiver burden interview, the family APGAR questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Katz index of independence in activities of daily living, and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory. Dialogue and interaction in the support group meetings was encouraged through guiding questions. RESULTS: The family caregivers, mostly women with low education, were responsible for older patients who were functionally dependent and had a low frequency and intensity of neuropsychiatric symptoms. The caregivers actively participated in the pilot group. They reported a mild subjective burden and did not present depressive symptoms. They had borderline anxiety symptoms and scores above 60 for all quality of life domains, in addition to good family functionality. CONCLUSIONS: The participants in this pilot group had a mild subjective burden, good perceived quality of life, and showed interest in a caregiver support group. Such groups could be a complementary and instrumentalizing practice in home care and could contribute to a lower caregiver burden and caregiver anxiety, improving their perceived quality of life related to the psychological and social relationship domains.","PeriodicalId":52782,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics Gerontology and Aging","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics Gerontology and Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5327/z2447-212320212000072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate subjective burden and perceived quality of life in primary caregivers who care for older adults at home. Caregivers were followed up in a pilot support group. The study also sought to describe the experience of encouraging dialogue and interaction within this group. METHODS: This quanti-qualitative study was limited to nine family caregivers. Data were collected using the following instruments: the World Health Organization Quality of Life abbreviated version, the Zarit caregiver burden interview, the family APGAR questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Katz index of independence in activities of daily living, and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory. Dialogue and interaction in the support group meetings was encouraged through guiding questions. RESULTS: The family caregivers, mostly women with low education, were responsible for older patients who were functionally dependent and had a low frequency and intensity of neuropsychiatric symptoms. The caregivers actively participated in the pilot group. They reported a mild subjective burden and did not present depressive symptoms. They had borderline anxiety symptoms and scores above 60 for all quality of life domains, in addition to good family functionality. CONCLUSIONS: The participants in this pilot group had a mild subjective burden, good perceived quality of life, and showed interest in a caregiver support group. Such groups could be a complementary and instrumentalizing practice in home care and could contribute to a lower caregiver burden and caregiver anxiety, improving their perceived quality of life related to the psychological and social relationship domains.
评估老年人家庭照顾者的主观负担和生活质量
目的:评估在家照顾老年人的主要照护者的主观负担和感知生活质量。护理人员在一个试点支持小组中进行了随访。该研究还试图描述在这个群体中鼓励对话和互动的经验。方法:本定量定性研究仅限于9名家庭照顾者。使用以下工具收集数据:世界卫生组织生活质量简化版、Zarit照顾者负担访谈、家庭APGAR问卷、医院焦虑和抑郁量表、Katz日常生活活动独立性指数和神经精神量表。通过指导性问题鼓励在支助小组会议上进行对话和互动。结果:老年患者功能依赖、神经精神症状发生率低、强度低,主要由受教育程度低的女性家庭照顾者负责。护理人员积极参与试验组。他们报告有轻微的主观负担,没有出现抑郁症状。他们有边缘性焦虑症状,除了良好的家庭功能外,所有生活质量领域的得分都在60分以上。结论:该试验组的参与者主观负担轻微,感知生活质量良好,并对护理人员支持小组表现出兴趣。这样的群体可以作为家庭护理的补充和工具化实践,并有助于减轻照顾者的负担和照顾者的焦虑,提高他们在心理和社会关系领域的感知生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信