Challenges and Coping Mechanisms in Supervision of the Instructional Leaders in the New Normal

Glenda C. Magno
{"title":"Challenges and Coping Mechanisms in Supervision of the Instructional Leaders in the New Normal","authors":"Glenda C. Magno","doi":"10.54476/ioer-imrj/280386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supervision is an important role of instructional leaders in the new normal and is a pressing global issue. The study found out what challenges and coping mechanisms instructional leaders faced in supervising in the new normal. This is a pressing global issue that is of great interest to stakeholders. This mixed research method involved 102 faculty respondents and 6 Deans of the different Bataan Peninsula State University colleges. Results showed that 26 or 25.49% of the respondents belong to the age group of 32 to 39 years old. The Deans were designated as early as 3 months to 12 years. Their supervision experiences with the teachers and students include difficulties in monitoring teachers and students and innovative methods of instruction. Data showed that the deans considered planning a program for curriculum development (Mean=3.54, SD=0.82) as very challenging. Data indicate that a significant difference is not evident in the perception of teacher-respondents on the challenges their deans met in the new normal and the deans’ coping mechanisms in resolving the challenges they met in the new normal when grouped according to the length of service. The analysis using Spearman’s rho indicates a very weak positive correlation between coping mechanisms and the challenges in planning a program for curriculum development, implementing a definite program of supervision, and providing leadership in the professional upgrading of the faculty. The p-values which are statistically lesser than the alpha of .05 indicate that there is not enough evidence to claim that the relationship is significant, thus, it fails to reject the null hypothesis. The challenges that were experienced in supervision included the Dearth of Resources, Communication, and Age barriers. Coping mechanisms that they employed include versatility and flexibility in leadership. Supervisory competencies of instructional lead include Interpersonal Skills. Keywords: Challenges and Coping Mechanisms, Convergent Mixed Method, Instructional Leaders, New Normal, Philippines","PeriodicalId":6900,"journal":{"name":"ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54476/ioer-imrj/280386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Supervision is an important role of instructional leaders in the new normal and is a pressing global issue. The study found out what challenges and coping mechanisms instructional leaders faced in supervising in the new normal. This is a pressing global issue that is of great interest to stakeholders. This mixed research method involved 102 faculty respondents and 6 Deans of the different Bataan Peninsula State University colleges. Results showed that 26 or 25.49% of the respondents belong to the age group of 32 to 39 years old. The Deans were designated as early as 3 months to 12 years. Their supervision experiences with the teachers and students include difficulties in monitoring teachers and students and innovative methods of instruction. Data showed that the deans considered planning a program for curriculum development (Mean=3.54, SD=0.82) as very challenging. Data indicate that a significant difference is not evident in the perception of teacher-respondents on the challenges their deans met in the new normal and the deans’ coping mechanisms in resolving the challenges they met in the new normal when grouped according to the length of service. The analysis using Spearman’s rho indicates a very weak positive correlation between coping mechanisms and the challenges in planning a program for curriculum development, implementing a definite program of supervision, and providing leadership in the professional upgrading of the faculty. The p-values which are statistically lesser than the alpha of .05 indicate that there is not enough evidence to claim that the relationship is significant, thus, it fails to reject the null hypothesis. The challenges that were experienced in supervision included the Dearth of Resources, Communication, and Age barriers. Coping mechanisms that they employed include versatility and flexibility in leadership. Supervisory competencies of instructional lead include Interpersonal Skills. Keywords: Challenges and Coping Mechanisms, Convergent Mixed Method, Instructional Leaders, New Normal, Philippines
新常态下教学领导监督的挑战与应对机制
督导是新常态下教学领导者的重要角色,是一个迫切需要解决的全球性问题。研究发现了新常态下教学领导在督导工作中面临的挑战和应对机制。这是一个紧迫的全球性问题,利益攸关方对此非常感兴趣。这种混合研究方法涉及102名教师受访者和巴丹半岛州立大学不同学院的6名院长。结果显示,年龄在32 - 39岁之间的受访者占26人,占25.49%。院长早在3个月到12岁时就被指定了。他们对教师和学生的监督经验包括监督教师和学生的困难和创新的教学方法。数据显示,院长们认为规划一个课程开发项目(均值=3.54,标准差=0.82)非常具有挑战性。数据显示,受访教师对院长在新常态下面临的挑战的感知,以及院长应对新常态挑战的应对机制,在按服务年限分组时,差异不显著。利用斯皮尔曼的rho分析表明,应对机制与计划课程发展计划、实施明确的监督计划以及在教师专业升级中提供领导的挑战之间存在非常弱的正相关关系。p值在统计学上小于0.05的alpha值表明没有足够的证据表明这种关系是显著的,因此,它不能拒绝原假设。在督导工作中遇到的挑战包括资源缺乏、沟通障碍和年龄障碍。他们采用的应对机制包括领导的多功能性和灵活性。教学领导的监督能力包括人际交往能力。关键词:挑战与应对机制,融合混合方法,教学领导者,新常态,菲律宾
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信