L1 Cell Adhesion Molecule as a Predictor of Disease-Specific Survival and Patterns of Relapse in Endometrial Cancer.

Annukka Pasanen, Taru Tuomi, Jorma Isola, Synnöve Staff, Ralf Bützow, Mikko Loukovaara
{"title":"L1 Cell Adhesion Molecule as a Predictor of Disease-Specific Survival and Patterns of Relapse in Endometrial Cancer.","authors":"Annukka Pasanen, Taru Tuomi, Jorma Isola, Synnöve Staff, Ralf Bützow, Mikko Loukovaara","doi":"10.1097/IGC.0000000000000801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to study the association of L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) expression with the outcome of patients with endometrial cancer, especially with regard to conventional risk variables, and to compare the patterns of relapse in L1CAM-positive and -negative cancers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of 805 women. The Kaplan-Meier method and univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were applied for survival analyses. Missing data were replaced using multiple imputation. The median follow-up time was 51 months (range, 1-98).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred twenty-one (15.0%) cases were L1CAM positive. L1CAM positivity was associated with high stage (I vs II-IV) (odds ratio [OR], 2.3), lymph node involvement (OR, 2.9), poor differentiation (OR, 6.1), non-endometrioid histology (OR, 9.9), lymphovascular space invasion (OR, 2.8), cervical stromal invasion (OR, 1.8), positive peritoneal cytology (OR, 4.1), and age older than 65 years (OR, 2.8). The frequencies of deep myometrial invasion (50% or deeper), tumor size 2 cm or greater, and body mass index 30 kg/m or greater were not significantly different between L1CAM-positive and -negative cases. L1CAM predicted poor disease-specific survival in endometrioid (P < 0.0001) but not in non-endometrioid carcinomas (P = 0.934). The negative impact of L1CAM on outcome was confirmed in a Cox multivariate disease-specific survival analysis. Univariate survival analyses in the different ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO endometrial cancer risk groups showed an association between L1CAM positivity and poor outcome in intermediate (hazard ratio, 12) and high-risk advanced metastatic (hazard ratio, 2.0) groups. Extra-abdominal relapses were more frequent in L1CAM-positive (13.2%) than L1CAM-negative (1.9%) stage I endometrioid carcinomas (P < 0.0001), whereas other site-specific relapses in local cancers were L1CAM independent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>L1CAM is associated with the occurrence of poor prognostic variables and predicts advanced disease in endometrial cancer. L1CAM predicts extra-abdominal relapses and poor survival in endometrioid endometrial cancer, but seems not to be a prognostic factor in non-endometrioid carcinomas.</p>","PeriodicalId":13983,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer","volume":"54 1","pages":"1465-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim was to study the association of L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) expression with the outcome of patients with endometrial cancer, especially with regard to conventional risk variables, and to compare the patterns of relapse in L1CAM-positive and -negative cancers.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of 805 women. The Kaplan-Meier method and univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were applied for survival analyses. Missing data were replaced using multiple imputation. The median follow-up time was 51 months (range, 1-98).

Results: One hundred twenty-one (15.0%) cases were L1CAM positive. L1CAM positivity was associated with high stage (I vs II-IV) (odds ratio [OR], 2.3), lymph node involvement (OR, 2.9), poor differentiation (OR, 6.1), non-endometrioid histology (OR, 9.9), lymphovascular space invasion (OR, 2.8), cervical stromal invasion (OR, 1.8), positive peritoneal cytology (OR, 4.1), and age older than 65 years (OR, 2.8). The frequencies of deep myometrial invasion (50% or deeper), tumor size 2 cm or greater, and body mass index 30 kg/m or greater were not significantly different between L1CAM-positive and -negative cases. L1CAM predicted poor disease-specific survival in endometrioid (P < 0.0001) but not in non-endometrioid carcinomas (P = 0.934). The negative impact of L1CAM on outcome was confirmed in a Cox multivariate disease-specific survival analysis. Univariate survival analyses in the different ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO endometrial cancer risk groups showed an association between L1CAM positivity and poor outcome in intermediate (hazard ratio, 12) and high-risk advanced metastatic (hazard ratio, 2.0) groups. Extra-abdominal relapses were more frequent in L1CAM-positive (13.2%) than L1CAM-negative (1.9%) stage I endometrioid carcinomas (P < 0.0001), whereas other site-specific relapses in local cancers were L1CAM independent.

Conclusions: L1CAM is associated with the occurrence of poor prognostic variables and predicts advanced disease in endometrial cancer. L1CAM predicts extra-abdominal relapses and poor survival in endometrioid endometrial cancer, but seems not to be a prognostic factor in non-endometrioid carcinomas.

L1细胞粘附分子作为子宫内膜癌疾病特异性生存和复发模式的预测因子
目的:研究L1细胞粘附分子(L1 cell adhesion molecule, L1CAM)表达与子宫内膜癌患者预后的关系,特别是与常规风险变量的关系,并比较L1CAM阳性和阴性癌症的复发模式。方法:对805名女性进行回顾性研究。生存率分析采用Kaplan-Meier法、单因素和多因素Cox回归模型。对缺失数据进行多次补全。中位随访时间为51个月(范围1-98)。结果:L1CAM阳性121例(15.0%)。L1CAM阳性与高分期(I期vs ii期- iv期)(比值比[OR], 2.3)、淋巴结累及(OR, 2.9)、分化差(OR, 6.1)、非子宫内膜样组织学(OR, 9.9)、淋巴血管间隙浸润(OR, 2.8)、宫颈间质浸润(OR, 1.8)、腹膜细胞学阳性(OR, 4.1)和年龄大于65岁(OR, 2.8)相关。l1cam阳性和阴性患者的深肌层浸润频率(50%或更深)、肿瘤大小2 cm及以上、体重指数30 kg/m及以上均无显著差异。L1CAM预测子宫内膜样癌的疾病特异性生存率较差(P < 0.0001),但在非子宫内膜样癌中没有预测(P = 0.934)。Cox多变量疾病特异性生存分析证实了L1CAM对预后的负面影响。不同ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO子宫内膜癌风险组的单因素生存分析显示,L1CAM阳性与中度(风险比为12)和高风险晚期转移(风险比为2.0)组预后不良相关。L1CAM阳性的I期子宫内膜样癌的腹外复发(13.2%)比L1CAM阴性的(1.9%)更为频繁(P < 0.0001),而局部癌症的其他部位特异性复发与L1CAM无关。结论:L1CAM与子宫内膜癌不良预后变量的发生相关,可预测晚期疾病。L1CAM可预测子宫内膜样子宫内膜癌的腹外复发和较差的生存率,但似乎不是非子宫内膜样癌的预后因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书