Prevalence of open defecation among households with toilets and associated factors in rural areas of district Sonepat in Haryana

B. Rani, Anshu Yadav, S. Jha, A. Punia, Sanjeet Singh
{"title":"Prevalence of open defecation among households with toilets and associated factors in rural areas of district Sonepat in Haryana","authors":"B. Rani, Anshu Yadav, S. Jha, A. Punia, Sanjeet Singh","doi":"10.4103/ed.ed_22_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Constructing latrines and getting people to use them is one of the most effective means of improving public health and saving lives. However, building toilets alone cannot eliminate open defecation. Aims: The aim was to estimate the prevalence of open defecation and factors associated with open defecation in rural areas of a district of Haryana. Settings and Design: This community-based cross-sectional study was carried out in a rural field practice area attached to the department of community medicine of a rural medical college. Subjects and Methods: The study was carried out from July to October 2019. The data were collected from 368 randomly selected households on a pretested semi-structured proforma. Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional ethics committee. Statistical Analysis Used: The data were analyzed using the software R, version 3.6.2. Chi-square, Fisher's exact test, crude odds ratio, adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence interval, and P value were calculated. Results: The prevalence of open defecation was 30.97% despite having a household toilet. Among the study participants practicing open defecation, the prevalence of open defecation was significantly higher among scheduled caste (64.9%), illiterates (42.7%), laborers (56.6%), and low family income (41.5%). The participants who have constructed latrine recently, i.e., <1 year before (87%), latrine constructed by government expenses (76.9%), and rarely cleaning of the latrine (76.5%) also contributed significantly. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that four of these predictor variables, caste, occupation of the head of the family, years since latrine constructed, and latrine cleaning remained significant predictors of open field defecation. Conclusions: Open defecation is common among latrines owners. This behavior is associated with various several structural and sociocultural factors. The present sanitation campaign should consider shifting from toilet construction to toilet use.","PeriodicalId":11702,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Disease","volume":"46 1","pages":"87 - 92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ed.ed_22_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Context: Constructing latrines and getting people to use them is one of the most effective means of improving public health and saving lives. However, building toilets alone cannot eliminate open defecation. Aims: The aim was to estimate the prevalence of open defecation and factors associated with open defecation in rural areas of a district of Haryana. Settings and Design: This community-based cross-sectional study was carried out in a rural field practice area attached to the department of community medicine of a rural medical college. Subjects and Methods: The study was carried out from July to October 2019. The data were collected from 368 randomly selected households on a pretested semi-structured proforma. Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional ethics committee. Statistical Analysis Used: The data were analyzed using the software R, version 3.6.2. Chi-square, Fisher's exact test, crude odds ratio, adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence interval, and P value were calculated. Results: The prevalence of open defecation was 30.97% despite having a household toilet. Among the study participants practicing open defecation, the prevalence of open defecation was significantly higher among scheduled caste (64.9%), illiterates (42.7%), laborers (56.6%), and low family income (41.5%). The participants who have constructed latrine recently, i.e., <1 year before (87%), latrine constructed by government expenses (76.9%), and rarely cleaning of the latrine (76.5%) also contributed significantly. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that four of these predictor variables, caste, occupation of the head of the family, years since latrine constructed, and latrine cleaning remained significant predictors of open field defecation. Conclusions: Open defecation is common among latrines owners. This behavior is associated with various several structural and sociocultural factors. The present sanitation campaign should consider shifting from toilet construction to toilet use.
哈里亚纳邦索内帕特农村地区有厕所的家庭露天排便的流行情况及相关因素
背景:建造厕所并让人们使用它们是改善公共卫生和拯救生命的最有效手段之一。然而,仅靠修建厕所并不能消除露天排便。目的:目的是估计哈里亚纳邦一个地区农村地区露天排便的流行程度和与露天排便相关的因素。设置与设计:本以社区为基础的横断面研究在一所农村医学院社区医学系附属的农村野外实践区进行。研究对象和方法:研究于2019年7月至10月进行。数据是从368个随机选择的家庭中收集的,采用预先测试的半结构化形式。获得了机构伦理委员会的伦理批准。使用方法:使用R软件进行数据分析,版本为3.6.2。计算卡方、Fisher精确检验、粗优势比、校正95%置信区间优势比和P值。结果:尽管有家庭厕所,露天排便的发生率为30.97%。在露天排便的研究参与者中,排便率在低种姓(64.9%)、文盲(42.7%)、劳动者(56.6%)和低收入家庭(41.5%)中显著较高。最近(即少于1年前)建造厕所的参与者(87%)、政府费用建造厕所的参与者(76.9%)和很少清洁厕所的参与者(76.5%)也有显著贡献。多变量logistic回归分析显示,种姓、一家之主的职业、建造厕所的年限和厕所清洁这四个预测变量仍然是露天场所排便的重要预测因素。结论:露天排便在厕所主人中较为常见。这种行为与各种结构和社会文化因素有关。目前的卫生运动应考虑从厕所建设转向厕所使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信