Effects of Trunk Rotation and Backrest Activity on Lumbar sEMG Activities, Body Pressure Distribution and Sitting Discomfort during Sitting

Zhiping Liu
{"title":"Effects of Trunk Rotation and Backrest Activity on Lumbar sEMG Activities, Body Pressure Distribution and Sitting Discomfort during Sitting","authors":"Zhiping Liu","doi":"10.1145/3375923.3375941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of trunk rotation and backrest activity on sitting discomfort, body pressure distribution and lumbar surface Electromyographic (sEMG) activities of lumbar erector spinae muscles (LES) and lumbar multifidus muscles (LMF), so as to provide a scientific basis on dynamic chair design and optimization and human-table-chair office system design. Ten healthy male subjects sat on two kinds of office chairs (one fixed dual-back chair and one movable dual-back chair), rotating 60° to the left and the right to simulate the common trunk activities of office work with the seatpan and backrest angle of 110°. Four tests were performed on each subject and sEMG activities of bilateral LES and LMF and body pressure distribution data of seatpan and backrest were statically measured. Meanwhile the Body Part Discomfort (BPD) Scale (Revised) was used to measure the subjective feelings of sitting discomfort. The results showed: (1) backrest activity did not affect marginally on LES and LMF myoelectric activities (P>.05) but trunk rotation had a significant effect on sEMG activities of left LMF (P<.01); (2) trunk rotation did not affect marginally on all the pressure variables (P>.05) but backrest activity affected marginally on average seatpan pressure (ASP), average backrest pressure (ABP) and peak backrest pressure (PBP) (P<.05); (3) low back discomfort (LBD) and total discomfort (OD) subjective ratings were significantly affected by backrest activity which had a large difference between fixed and movable dual-back chair and the latter gained a lower rating of discomfort. This study systematically utilized the combination of objective and subjective measurement to confirm that movable dual-back chairs were significantly better than fixed dual-back chairs which showed the superiority of dynamic chairs.","PeriodicalId":20457,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 6th International Conference on Biomedical and Bioinformatics Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 6th International Conference on Biomedical and Bioinformatics Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3375923.3375941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of trunk rotation and backrest activity on sitting discomfort, body pressure distribution and lumbar surface Electromyographic (sEMG) activities of lumbar erector spinae muscles (LES) and lumbar multifidus muscles (LMF), so as to provide a scientific basis on dynamic chair design and optimization and human-table-chair office system design. Ten healthy male subjects sat on two kinds of office chairs (one fixed dual-back chair and one movable dual-back chair), rotating 60° to the left and the right to simulate the common trunk activities of office work with the seatpan and backrest angle of 110°. Four tests were performed on each subject and sEMG activities of bilateral LES and LMF and body pressure distribution data of seatpan and backrest were statically measured. Meanwhile the Body Part Discomfort (BPD) Scale (Revised) was used to measure the subjective feelings of sitting discomfort. The results showed: (1) backrest activity did not affect marginally on LES and LMF myoelectric activities (P>.05) but trunk rotation had a significant effect on sEMG activities of left LMF (P<.01); (2) trunk rotation did not affect marginally on all the pressure variables (P>.05) but backrest activity affected marginally on average seatpan pressure (ASP), average backrest pressure (ABP) and peak backrest pressure (PBP) (P<.05); (3) low back discomfort (LBD) and total discomfort (OD) subjective ratings were significantly affected by backrest activity which had a large difference between fixed and movable dual-back chair and the latter gained a lower rating of discomfort. This study systematically utilized the combination of objective and subjective measurement to confirm that movable dual-back chairs were significantly better than fixed dual-back chairs which showed the superiority of dynamic chairs.
躯干旋转和靠背活动对腰椎肌电信号活动、体压分布和坐姿不适的影响
本研究旨在探讨躯干旋转和靠背活动对坐姿不适、体压分布及腰竖脊肌(LES)和腰椎多裂肌(LMF)腰表肌电图(sEMG)活动的影响,为动态座椅设计优化和人-桌-椅办公系统设计提供科学依据。10名健康男性受试者分别坐在两种办公椅上(一种固定双靠背椅和一种活动双靠背椅),左右旋转60°,座椅与靠背夹角为110°,模拟办公中常见的躯干活动。每位受试者进行4项测试,静态测量双侧腰侧、腰侧颞叶肌电活动和坐垫、靠背体压分布数据。同时,采用身体部位不适(BPD)量表(修订版)测量坐姿不适的主观感受。结果表明:(1)靠背活动对左腰侧肌电活动无显著影响(P> 0.05),躯干旋转对左腰侧肌电活动有显著影响(P> 0.05),而靠背活动对平均坐垫压(ASP)、平均靠背压(ABP)和峰值靠背压(PBP)有显著影响(P< 0.05);(3)腰背不适(LBD)和总不适(OD)主观评分受靠背活动的显著影响,固定和活动双靠背椅的总不适评分差异较大,活动双靠背椅的总不适评分较低。本研究系统地采用客观与主观相结合的测量方法,证实了活动双靠背椅明显优于固定双靠背椅,体现了动态椅的优越性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信