Short-term outcomes of eTEP repair of ventral hernia in university hospital of Nepal

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY
B. Mandal, Abhijeet Kumar, S. Agrawal, S. Sah, Rakesh Gupta
{"title":"Short-term outcomes of eTEP repair of ventral hernia in university hospital of Nepal","authors":"B. Mandal, Abhijeet Kumar, S. Agrawal, S. Sah, Rakesh Gupta","doi":"10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_10_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Ventral hernia (primary and incisional) is one of the most frequently encountered problems by the General Surgeon. The enhanced view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) technique for inguinal hernia was first described by J Daes, which was later used in ventral hernia repair for the first time by Belyansky et al. We applied the same technique for ventral hernia repair to see its feasibility in the context of our country. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It is a single-center prospective observational study of a patient who underwent eTEP (with or without TAR) by a single surgeon between September 2019 and May 2020 and followed up for 12 months. Patient demographics, hernia characteristics, operative details, perioperative complications, and satisfaction scores using the Likert scale were collected for data analysis. RESULTS: The study included 42 patients with 66% of female among them. The mean age was 51 ± 12.97 years, the mean BMI was 29.88 ± 2.16 kg/m2, and the mean ASA of patients was 1.5. Incisional hernia (74%) was the most common diagnosis. The mean operative time was less for the primary hernia (125.45 min) than for the incisional hernia (138.35 min). Intraoperative complications were seen in three (7%) of all the patients. Postoperative length of hospital stay was 1.8 days on average. Postoperative pain was low with only one of the patients having chronic pain while none had a recurrence on follow-up. All the patients were satisfied. CONCLUSION: eTEP is a feasible, cheap, and safe alternative MIS option as it has less morbidity and does not carry an extra cost of mesh in comparison to conventional procedures.","PeriodicalId":34200,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_10_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ventral hernia (primary and incisional) is one of the most frequently encountered problems by the General Surgeon. The enhanced view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) technique for inguinal hernia was first described by J Daes, which was later used in ventral hernia repair for the first time by Belyansky et al. We applied the same technique for ventral hernia repair to see its feasibility in the context of our country. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It is a single-center prospective observational study of a patient who underwent eTEP (with or without TAR) by a single surgeon between September 2019 and May 2020 and followed up for 12 months. Patient demographics, hernia characteristics, operative details, perioperative complications, and satisfaction scores using the Likert scale were collected for data analysis. RESULTS: The study included 42 patients with 66% of female among them. The mean age was 51 ± 12.97 years, the mean BMI was 29.88 ± 2.16 kg/m2, and the mean ASA of patients was 1.5. Incisional hernia (74%) was the most common diagnosis. The mean operative time was less for the primary hernia (125.45 min) than for the incisional hernia (138.35 min). Intraoperative complications were seen in three (7%) of all the patients. Postoperative length of hospital stay was 1.8 days on average. Postoperative pain was low with only one of the patients having chronic pain while none had a recurrence on follow-up. All the patients were satisfied. CONCLUSION: eTEP is a feasible, cheap, and safe alternative MIS option as it has less morbidity and does not carry an extra cost of mesh in comparison to conventional procedures.
尼泊尔大学医院eTEP治疗腹疝的近期疗效分析
背景:腹疝(原发性和切口)是普通外科医生最常遇到的问题之一。腹股沟疝全腹膜外显像(eTEP)技术最早由J Daes描述,后由Belyansky等首次应用于腹股沟疝修补。我们将同样的技术应用于腹疝修补,以观察其在我国的可行性。材料和方法:这是一项单中心前瞻性观察性研究,研究对象是一名外科医生在2019年9月至2020年5月期间接受了eTEP(伴或不伴TAR)的患者,随访12个月。收集患者人口统计学、疝气特征、手术细节、围手术期并发症和使用李克特量表的满意度评分进行数据分析。结果:纳入42例患者,其中女性占66%。平均年龄51±12.97岁,平均BMI为29.88±2.16 kg/m2,平均ASA为1.5。切口疝(74%)是最常见的诊断。原发性疝的平均手术时间(125.45 min)少于切口疝(138.35 min)。所有患者中有3例(7%)出现术中并发症。术后平均住院时间1.8天。术后疼痛低,只有1例患者有慢性疼痛,随访时无复发。所有患者均满意。结论:与传统手术相比,eTEP是一种可行、廉价、安全的MIS替代方案,因为它的发病率低,而且不需要额外的补片成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信