Álvaro González-Domínguez, A. Lechuga-Sancho, R. González-Domínguez
{"title":"Comparison of the metabolomic signature of diabetes and the oral glucose tolerance test","authors":"Álvaro González-Domínguez, A. Lechuga-Sancho, R. González-Domínguez","doi":"10.3390/ecmc-4-05571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intervention trials attempt to clarify the possible effects of certain challenge tests on study subjects (e.g. drugs effectiveness, environmental exposure experiments), while observational studies employ free-living populations to analyze the relationship between a particular effect and possible triggering factors. Based on the hypothesis under investigation, the researcher will choose the appropriate study design. Nevertheless, here we report the utility of combining observational and interventional studies to discover confident biomarkers in the clinical field (1). We contrasted metabolomic profiles related with diabetes and the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), a clinical test used to simulate the hyperinsulinemia observed in diabetes. We found that the main metabolic changes occur in the same metabolite classes, including energy-related metabolites, amino acids (especially brain chain amino acids, BCAA) and multiple lipids, such as free fatty acids, acyl-carnitines, triglycerides and phospholipids, among them. Hence, challenge tests such as the OGTT guarantee to be a great strategy to investigate pathological signatures associated with the development of diseases as a previous step before performing validation works in observational studies. \n (1) A. Gonzalez-Dominguez, A.M. Lechuga-Sancho, R. Gonzalez-Dominguez. Intervention and Observational Trials are Complementary in Metabolomics: Diabetes and the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 18 (2018) 896-900","PeriodicalId":20450,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 4th International Electronic Conference on Medicinal Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 4th International Electronic Conference on Medicinal Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ecmc-4-05571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Intervention trials attempt to clarify the possible effects of certain challenge tests on study subjects (e.g. drugs effectiveness, environmental exposure experiments), while observational studies employ free-living populations to analyze the relationship between a particular effect and possible triggering factors. Based on the hypothesis under investigation, the researcher will choose the appropriate study design. Nevertheless, here we report the utility of combining observational and interventional studies to discover confident biomarkers in the clinical field (1). We contrasted metabolomic profiles related with diabetes and the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), a clinical test used to simulate the hyperinsulinemia observed in diabetes. We found that the main metabolic changes occur in the same metabolite classes, including energy-related metabolites, amino acids (especially brain chain amino acids, BCAA) and multiple lipids, such as free fatty acids, acyl-carnitines, triglycerides and phospholipids, among them. Hence, challenge tests such as the OGTT guarantee to be a great strategy to investigate pathological signatures associated with the development of diseases as a previous step before performing validation works in observational studies.
(1) A. Gonzalez-Dominguez, A.M. Lechuga-Sancho, R. Gonzalez-Dominguez. Intervention and Observational Trials are Complementary in Metabolomics: Diabetes and the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 18 (2018) 896-900
干预试验试图澄清某些挑战试验对研究对象可能产生的影响(例如药物有效性、环境暴露试验),而观察性研究则利用自由生活的人群来分析特定影响与可能的触发因素之间的关系。根据所调查的假设,研究者将选择合适的研究设计。尽管如此,我们报告了结合观察性和介入性研究在临床领域发现可靠生物标志物的实用性(1)。我们对比了与糖尿病相关的代谢组学特征和口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT),一种用于模拟糖尿病中观察到的高胰岛素血症的临床试验。我们发现,主要的代谢变化发生在相同的代谢物类别中,包括能量相关代谢物、氨基酸(特别是脑链氨基酸、BCAA)和多种脂质,如游离脂肪酸、酰基肉碱、甘油三酯和磷脂。因此,像OGTT这样的挑战测试保证是一种伟大的策略,可以在观察性研究中进行验证工作之前,作为研究与疾病发展相关的病理特征的前一步。(1) A. Gonzalez-Dominguez, A.M.莱楚加-桑乔,R.冈萨雷斯-多明格斯。干预和观察试验在代谢组学:糖尿病和口服葡萄糖耐量试验中是互补的。咕咕叫。上面。医学化学,18 (2018)896-900