Combined Therapy Versus Usual Care in the Treatment of Depressed Cancer Patients With Pain

A. Bovero, V. Ieraci, L. Amodeo, A. Malabaila, A. Ferrero, R. Torta
{"title":"Combined Therapy Versus Usual Care in the Treatment of Depressed Cancer Patients With Pain","authors":"A. Bovero, V. Ieraci, L. Amodeo, A. Malabaila, A. Ferrero, R. Torta","doi":"10.14302/ISSN.2574-612X.IJPR-17-1604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare Brief Adlerian Psychodynamic Psychotherapy (B-APP) plus venlafaxine versus venlafaxine plus usual care on pain and depressive symptomatology of depressed patients with cancer pain. Methods: A total of 100 patients with pain and mood depression, according to DSM IV-TR, were randomized to receive treatment with B-APP plus venlafaxine (n=51) or venlafaxine plus usual care (n=49). The sample was evaluated at baseline and after 10 weeks with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS); the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS); the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS); the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI); the Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale (Mini-MAC); the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Dosage Record and Treatment Emergent Symptom scale (DOTES). Only at the endpoint was the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale (VSSS-54) also administered. Results: A significant reduction in VAS and HADS scores was observed in both treatments, but a higher significance (p<0.01) was present only in subjects also treated with psychotherapy. A significant change was obtained in Mini-MAC scores (p<0.01) for Fighting Spirit, Fatalism, Anxious Preoccupation (p<0.01) and Avoidance items (p<0.05) only in patients treated with combined therapy. The combined group also showed more satisfaction with the treatment in their responses to the VSSS-54. Conclusions: Brief Adlerian Psychodynamic Psychotherapy (B-APP) in combination with venlafaxine was superior to usual care and venlafaxine in improving depressive symptomatology and reducing pain. DOI : 10.14302/issn.2574-612X.ijpr-17-1604 Corresponding author: Andrea Bovero, Clinical Psychology and Psycho-Oncology Unit – Department of Neurosciences, University of Turin, Italy, e-mail: abovero@cittadellasalute.to.it, Telephone: +390116334200 Fax: +390116334349 Running title: Treatments in depressed cancer pain patients","PeriodicalId":79465,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of psychotherapy practice and research","volume":"8 1","pages":"30-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of psychotherapy practice and research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14302/ISSN.2574-612X.IJPR-17-1604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To compare Brief Adlerian Psychodynamic Psychotherapy (B-APP) plus venlafaxine versus venlafaxine plus usual care on pain and depressive symptomatology of depressed patients with cancer pain. Methods: A total of 100 patients with pain and mood depression, according to DSM IV-TR, were randomized to receive treatment with B-APP plus venlafaxine (n=51) or venlafaxine plus usual care (n=49). The sample was evaluated at baseline and after 10 weeks with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS); the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS); the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS); the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI); the Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale (Mini-MAC); the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Dosage Record and Treatment Emergent Symptom scale (DOTES). Only at the endpoint was the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale (VSSS-54) also administered. Results: A significant reduction in VAS and HADS scores was observed in both treatments, but a higher significance (p<0.01) was present only in subjects also treated with psychotherapy. A significant change was obtained in Mini-MAC scores (p<0.01) for Fighting Spirit, Fatalism, Anxious Preoccupation (p<0.01) and Avoidance items (p<0.05) only in patients treated with combined therapy. The combined group also showed more satisfaction with the treatment in their responses to the VSSS-54. Conclusions: Brief Adlerian Psychodynamic Psychotherapy (B-APP) in combination with venlafaxine was superior to usual care and venlafaxine in improving depressive symptomatology and reducing pain. DOI : 10.14302/issn.2574-612X.ijpr-17-1604 Corresponding author: Andrea Bovero, Clinical Psychology and Psycho-Oncology Unit – Department of Neurosciences, University of Turin, Italy, e-mail: abovero@cittadellasalute.to.it, Telephone: +390116334200 Fax: +390116334349 Running title: Treatments in depressed cancer pain patients
联合治疗与常规护理治疗抑郁症癌症患者疼痛的比较
目的:比较简式阿德勒心理动力治疗联合文拉法辛与文拉法辛联合常规护理对抑郁症伴癌性疼痛患者疼痛及抑郁症状的影响。方法:根据DSM IV-TR,将100例疼痛和情绪抑郁患者随机分为B-APP联合文拉法辛治疗组(51例)和文拉法辛联合常规护理组(49例)。在基线和10周后用视觉模拟量表(VAS)对样本进行评估;医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS);抑郁评定量表(MADRS);临床全球印象(CGI);迷你癌症心理适应量表(Mini-MAC);欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织生活质量问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)和剂量记录和治疗紧急症状量表(DOTES)。仅在终点进行维罗纳服务满意度量表(VSSS-54)。结果:两种治疗均显著降低VAS和HADS评分,但仅在同时接受心理治疗的受试者中存在更高的显著性(p<0.01)。只有联合治疗的患者在战斗精神、宿命论、焦虑关注和回避项目的Mini-MAC得分(p<0.01)有显著变化(p<0.05)。联合治疗组在VSSS-54的反应中也表现出对治疗的更高满意度。结论:简要阿德勒心理动力治疗联合文拉法辛在改善抑郁症状和减轻疼痛方面优于常规护理和文拉法辛。DOI: 10.14302/issn.2574-612X。通讯作者:Andrea Bovero,意大利都灵大学神经科学系临床心理学和心理肿瘤科,e-mail: abovero@cittadellasalute.to.it,电话:+390116334200传真:+390116334349运行题目:抑郁症癌症疼痛患者的治疗
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信