Use of Nasal Airflow-Inducing Maneuver with olfactory training in patients with post-laryngectomy anosmia: a pilot study

IF 1 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Madeleine St. Peter, Suraj Shankar, Jennifer A. Villwock
{"title":"Use of Nasal Airflow-Inducing Maneuver with olfactory training in patients with post-laryngectomy anosmia: a pilot study","authors":"Madeleine St. Peter, Suraj Shankar, Jennifer A. Villwock","doi":"10.1080/2050571X.2021.1975227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Up to 75% of patients who have undergone a total laryngectomy (TL) suffer from hyposmia or anosmia. The only intervention currently available is the Nasal Airflow-Inducing Maneuver (NAIM), which has been shown to restore smell in about half of TL patients with olfactory deficiencies. Although the NAIM can intermittently provide some mechanical compensation for olfactory loss, there are no therapeutic tools available that consistently provide olfactory stimulation and sensitization after TL. Olfactory training (OT) is a structured smell regimen that has been shown to recover smell in other patient populations with olfactory dysfunction such as post-viral and traumatic brain injury-induced anosmia. Our objective was to propose a low-cost, simple olfactory regimen for TL patients that combines OT and NAIM. In addition, we evaluate for changes in olfactory acuity using Sniffin’ Sticks 12 (SST12) and QOL following training. Seven TL patients underwent NAIM training, baseline olfactory testing, and QOL assessments. Five participants completed the 12–14 week training regimen and had repeat olfactory and QOL testing. Two of the five participants had improved SST12 scores, however, QOL scores remained similar to baseline.","PeriodicalId":43000,"journal":{"name":"Speech Language and Hearing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Speech Language and Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2050571X.2021.1975227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Up to 75% of patients who have undergone a total laryngectomy (TL) suffer from hyposmia or anosmia. The only intervention currently available is the Nasal Airflow-Inducing Maneuver (NAIM), which has been shown to restore smell in about half of TL patients with olfactory deficiencies. Although the NAIM can intermittently provide some mechanical compensation for olfactory loss, there are no therapeutic tools available that consistently provide olfactory stimulation and sensitization after TL. Olfactory training (OT) is a structured smell regimen that has been shown to recover smell in other patient populations with olfactory dysfunction such as post-viral and traumatic brain injury-induced anosmia. Our objective was to propose a low-cost, simple olfactory regimen for TL patients that combines OT and NAIM. In addition, we evaluate for changes in olfactory acuity using Sniffin’ Sticks 12 (SST12) and QOL following training. Seven TL patients underwent NAIM training, baseline olfactory testing, and QOL assessments. Five participants completed the 12–14 week training regimen and had repeat olfactory and QOL testing. Two of the five participants had improved SST12 scores, however, QOL scores remained similar to baseline.
在喉切除术后嗅觉缺失患者中使用鼻腔气流诱导手法和嗅觉训练:一项初步研究
高达75%的接受全喉切除术(TL)的患者患有低喉或嗅觉缺失。目前唯一可用的干预措施是鼻腔气流诱导操作(NAIM),它已被证明可以恢复大约一半嗅觉缺陷的TL患者的嗅觉。虽然NAIM可以间歇性地为嗅觉丧失提供一些机械补偿,但目前还没有可用的治疗工具在TL后持续提供嗅觉刺激和敏化。嗅觉训练(OT)是一种结构化的嗅觉治疗方案,已被证明可以恢复其他嗅觉功能障碍患者的嗅觉功能,如病毒后和创伤性脑损伤引起的嗅觉缺失。我们的目标是为TL患者提出一种低成本、简单的嗅觉治疗方案,将OT和NAIM结合起来。此外,我们使用Sniffin ' Sticks 12 (SST12)和QOL评估训练后嗅觉灵敏度的变化。7例TL患者接受了NAIM训练、基线嗅觉测试和生活质量评估。5名参与者完成了12-14周的训练方案,并进行了重复的嗅觉和生活质量测试。5名参与者中有2人的SST12得分有所提高,然而,生活质量得分仍与基线相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Speech Language and Hearing
Speech Language and Hearing AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信