On the Justification and Validity of the Kennard Inequality

Haengjin Choe
{"title":"On the Justification and Validity of the Kennard Inequality","authors":"Haengjin Choe","doi":"10.11648/j.ajmp.20200905.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1927, Earle Hesse Kennard derived an inequality describing Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. Since then, we have traditionally been using the standard deviation as the measure of uncertainty in quantum mechanics. But Jan Hilgevoord asserts that the standard deviation is neither a natural nor a generally adequate measure of quantum uncertainty. Specifically, he asserts that the standard deviations are inadequate to use as the quantum uncertainties in the single- and double-slit diffraction experiments. He even tells that from these examples it will become clear that the standard deviation is the wrong concept to express the uncertainty principle generally and that the Kennard relation has little to do with the uncertainty principle. We will investigate what are adequate as the measures of quantum uncertainty. And, beyond that, we will investigate the effects of multiplying the two uncertainties; namely, characteristics which is hiding in deep interior of the Kennard inequality. Through investigations we’ll come to naturally realize that his assertions were wrong. All of our discussions will help raise understanding of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Our discussions will afford us an opportunity to think about the essence of the Fourier transform. The aim of this paper is to draw conclusions about whether the Kennard inequality is justified or not.","PeriodicalId":7717,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Modern Physics","volume":"70 1","pages":"73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Modern Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmp.20200905.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In 1927, Earle Hesse Kennard derived an inequality describing Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. Since then, we have traditionally been using the standard deviation as the measure of uncertainty in quantum mechanics. But Jan Hilgevoord asserts that the standard deviation is neither a natural nor a generally adequate measure of quantum uncertainty. Specifically, he asserts that the standard deviations are inadequate to use as the quantum uncertainties in the single- and double-slit diffraction experiments. He even tells that from these examples it will become clear that the standard deviation is the wrong concept to express the uncertainty principle generally and that the Kennard relation has little to do with the uncertainty principle. We will investigate what are adequate as the measures of quantum uncertainty. And, beyond that, we will investigate the effects of multiplying the two uncertainties; namely, characteristics which is hiding in deep interior of the Kennard inequality. Through investigations we’ll come to naturally realize that his assertions were wrong. All of our discussions will help raise understanding of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Our discussions will afford us an opportunity to think about the essence of the Fourier transform. The aim of this paper is to draw conclusions about whether the Kennard inequality is justified or not.
论肯纳德不等式的正当性和有效性
1927年,Earle Hesse Kennard导出了一个描述海森堡测不准原理的不等式。从那时起,我们传统上一直使用标准偏差作为量子力学中不确定性的度量。但是Jan Hilgevoord断言,标准偏差既不是量子不确定性的自然度量,也不是一般适当的度量。具体来说,他认为标准偏差不足以作为单缝和双缝衍射实验中的量子不确定度。他甚至告诉我们,从这些例子中可以清楚地看出,标准偏差是一般表达测不准原理的错误概念,肯纳德关系与测不准原理几乎没有关系。我们将研究什么作为量子不确定性的度量是适当的。除此之外,我们将研究将两个不确定性相乘的影响;也就是隐藏在肯纳德不等式内部深处的特征。经过调查,我们自然会认识到他的断言是错误的。我们所有的讨论将有助于提高对海森堡测不准原理的理解。我们的讨论将使我们有机会思考傅里叶变换的本质。本文的目的是得出肯纳德不等式是否成立的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信