Purification of Turbid Water Using Orange Peel Extract and Luffa Mucilage

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
I. M. Al-aubadi, L. Hashim
{"title":"Purification of Turbid Water Using Orange Peel Extract and Luffa Mucilage","authors":"I. M. Al-aubadi, L. Hashim","doi":"10.37077/25200860.2022.35.2.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increase in aluminum ion concentration resulting from chemical coagulants in water treatment causes human health problems, including damage to brain cells and Alzheimer's disease. Therefore, numerous countries sought to find alternative coagulants extracted from natural, environmentally friendly organic sources for use in water treatment. The research included preparing an aqueous extract from orange peel, extracting luffa mucilage, as well as, calculating the yield, estimating the size of mucilage particles, and using them as plant coagulants to purify turbid water. Moreover, the optimum conditions were set for it, represented by the concentration of coagulants and the pH to give the highest efficiency in purifying turbid water. As well as using them as coagulation aids with alum to reduce the concentration of alum used in water purification. The results indicated that the optimum concentrations of natural coagulants ranged 40-50 ppm, where the orange peel coagulant exceeded the luffa coagulant with a significant difference in the turbidity removal, as it was 87 and 71% respectively, at pH values of 5 and 10. Likewise, there were significant differences in the reduction of heavy elements by using coagulants in water treatment. The results showed that there was a significant difference in the percentages of turbidity removal between the mixing ratio 1:0.5 and 1:0.25 (coagulant aid: Alum). Conversely, the use of the optimum concentration of orange peel coagulant with half the alum concentration gave turbidity removal percentages close to the use of alum alone in purifying water. It can be concluded from the study the possibility of using the extracted plant coagulants to reduce the concentration of alum used in purifying turbid water. The results reveled the highest significant decrease in the concentration of all heavy elements using luffa fruit coagulant and orange peel coagulant, compared to their concentration in turbid water before purification, which was 0.4 ppm.","PeriodicalId":8700,"journal":{"name":"Basrah Journal of Agricultural Sciences","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basrah Journal of Agricultural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37077/25200860.2022.35.2.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increase in aluminum ion concentration resulting from chemical coagulants in water treatment causes human health problems, including damage to brain cells and Alzheimer's disease. Therefore, numerous countries sought to find alternative coagulants extracted from natural, environmentally friendly organic sources for use in water treatment. The research included preparing an aqueous extract from orange peel, extracting luffa mucilage, as well as, calculating the yield, estimating the size of mucilage particles, and using them as plant coagulants to purify turbid water. Moreover, the optimum conditions were set for it, represented by the concentration of coagulants and the pH to give the highest efficiency in purifying turbid water. As well as using them as coagulation aids with alum to reduce the concentration of alum used in water purification. The results indicated that the optimum concentrations of natural coagulants ranged 40-50 ppm, where the orange peel coagulant exceeded the luffa coagulant with a significant difference in the turbidity removal, as it was 87 and 71% respectively, at pH values of 5 and 10. Likewise, there were significant differences in the reduction of heavy elements by using coagulants in water treatment. The results showed that there was a significant difference in the percentages of turbidity removal between the mixing ratio 1:0.5 and 1:0.25 (coagulant aid: Alum). Conversely, the use of the optimum concentration of orange peel coagulant with half the alum concentration gave turbidity removal percentages close to the use of alum alone in purifying water. It can be concluded from the study the possibility of using the extracted plant coagulants to reduce the concentration of alum used in purifying turbid water. The results reveled the highest significant decrease in the concentration of all heavy elements using luffa fruit coagulant and orange peel coagulant, compared to their concentration in turbid water before purification, which was 0.4 ppm.
用柑桔皮提取物和丝瓜浆液净化混浊水
水处理中的化学混凝剂导致铝离子浓度增加,导致人类健康问题,包括脑细胞受损和阿尔茨海默病。因此,许多国家都在寻找从天然、环保的有机来源中提取的可替代混凝剂,用于水处理。该研究包括从橘子皮中制备水提取物,提取丝瓜粘液,以及计算产量,估计粘液颗粒的大小,并将其用作植物混凝剂来净化浑浊水。以混凝剂的浓度和pH值为代表,确定了最佳的混凝条件,使其对浑浊水的净化效率最高。同时将它们与明矾一起用作助凝剂,以降低水净化中明矾的浓度。结果表明,天然混凝剂的最佳浓度为40 ~ 50 ppm,其中,在pH值为5和10时,橙皮混凝剂的去浊率分别为87%和71%,明显优于丝瓜混凝剂。同样,在水处理中使用混凝剂对重元素的还原也有显著差异。结果表明,混凝剂:明矾的混凝比为1:0.5和1:0.25时,混凝剂的去浊率有显著差异。相反,使用最佳浓度的橙皮混凝剂和一半的明矾浓度,其浊度去除率接近于在净化水中单独使用明矾。研究结果表明,利用提取的植物混凝剂降低明矾净化混浊水的浓度是可行的。结果表明,使用丝瓜果混凝剂和橘子皮混凝剂后,与净化前混浊水中的浓度(0.4 ppm)相比,所有重元素的浓度下降幅度最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Basrah Journal of Agricultural Sciences
Basrah Journal of Agricultural Sciences Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信