Perceived Inventory of Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing (PITCCN): Psychometric Evaluation

Hirokazu Ito, T. Tanioka, Mie Miyamoto, M. Miyagawa, Yuko Yasuhara, R. Locsin
{"title":"Perceived Inventory of Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing (PITCCN): Psychometric Evaluation","authors":"Hirokazu Ito, T. Tanioka, Mie Miyamoto, M. Miyagawa, Yuko Yasuhara, R. Locsin","doi":"10.20849/IJSN.V4I2.562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The theory of Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing (TCCN) was developed by Locsin (2005) to guide the expression of “technological competency as caring in nursing” among practicing nurses. While the Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing Instrument (TCCNI) was developed and translated into other languages, no instrument measuring the TCCN among Japanese nurses was developed and tested. Thus, the Perceived Inventory of Technological Competency of Caring in Nursing (PITCCN) was developed and improved. Aim: The aim of this study was to validate the PITCCN using construct validity through structural equation modeling (SEM). Methods: The PITCCN is a four-factor questionnaire. The PITCCN was distributed to four hospitals (402 nurses) from selected Shikoku District in Japan. The theoretical model was tested using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Exploratory factor analysis and CFA via a SEM were used to justify construct validity, and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was determined to establish reliability of constructs using SPSS and AMOS 25.0. Results: Finding shows that the chosen fit index test like Tucker Lewis Index (TLI), Goodness of Fit Index (GFI), and Normed Fit Index (NFI) are greater than 0.80 as set by the requirement. The values of the chi-square/degree of freedom (CMIN/DF), Comparative Fit Index (CFI), Incremental Fit Index (IFI), and Root Mean Square of Error Approximation (RMSEA) showed acceptable to good fit. Conclusion: GFI of the structure model was acceptable.","PeriodicalId":93573,"journal":{"name":"International journal of studies in nursing","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of studies in nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20849/IJSN.V4I2.562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: The theory of Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing (TCCN) was developed by Locsin (2005) to guide the expression of “technological competency as caring in nursing” among practicing nurses. While the Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing Instrument (TCCNI) was developed and translated into other languages, no instrument measuring the TCCN among Japanese nurses was developed and tested. Thus, the Perceived Inventory of Technological Competency of Caring in Nursing (PITCCN) was developed and improved. Aim: The aim of this study was to validate the PITCCN using construct validity through structural equation modeling (SEM). Methods: The PITCCN is a four-factor questionnaire. The PITCCN was distributed to four hospitals (402 nurses) from selected Shikoku District in Japan. The theoretical model was tested using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Exploratory factor analysis and CFA via a SEM were used to justify construct validity, and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was determined to establish reliability of constructs using SPSS and AMOS 25.0. Results: Finding shows that the chosen fit index test like Tucker Lewis Index (TLI), Goodness of Fit Index (GFI), and Normed Fit Index (NFI) are greater than 0.80 as set by the requirement. The values of the chi-square/degree of freedom (CMIN/DF), Comparative Fit Index (CFI), Incremental Fit Index (IFI), and Root Mean Square of Error Approximation (RMSEA) showed acceptable to good fit. Conclusion: GFI of the structure model was acceptable.
护理中护理技术能力感知量表(PITCCN):心理测量评估
背景:技术胜任力护理关怀理论(TCCN)由Locsin(2005)提出,旨在指导执业护士对“技术胜任力护理关怀”的表达。虽然《护理中的护理技术能力量表》(TCCNI)已被开发并翻译成其他语言,但日本护士的护理技术能力量表尚未被开发和测试。因此,护理护理技术能力感知量表(PITCCN)被开发和改进。目的:本研究的目的是通过结构方程模型(SEM)来验证PITCCN的构念效度。方法:PITCCN采用四因素问卷法。PITCCN已分发给日本四国区选定的四家医院(402名护士)。采用验证性因子分析(CFA)对理论模型进行检验。探索性因子分析和通过SEM的CFA用于验证结构效度,并使用SPSS和AMOS 25.0确定Cronbach α系数以确定结构的信度。结果:结果显示,所选择的拟合指标检验如Tucker Lewis指数(TLI)、拟合优度指数(GFI)和规范拟合指数(NFI)均大于要求设定的0.80。卡方/自由度(CMIN/DF)、比较拟合指数(CFI)、增量拟合指数(IFI)和误差均方根近似(RMSEA)的值均为可接受的良好拟合。结论:结构模型的GFI是可以接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信