World Political Theatre and Performance: Theories, Histories, Practices ed. by Mireia Aragay, Paola Botham, and José Ramón Prado-Pérez (review)

IF 0.3 3区 艺术学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
K. Wetmore
{"title":"World Political Theatre and Performance: Theories, Histories, Practices ed. by Mireia Aragay, Paola Botham, and José Ramón Prado-Pérez (review)","authors":"K. Wetmore","doi":"10.1353/atj.2022.0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This volume arose out of the Political Performances Working Group of IFTR, offering fourteen essays concerning political performances in Finland, the United Kingdom, Malta, Turkey, Belarus, Poland, Estonia, South Africa, India, and China. It is the last two that would be of interest to readers of this journal, although the entire volume is interesting and readable. At heart, by “political theatre” the editors here refer to theatre in response to political oppression and social injustice. The volume is divided into two sections. The first considers “the relationship between performance and activism” and the second concerns “current debates in and around political theatre” (p. 4). In part one the Asianist will find two essays of particular interest. The first, Pujya Ghosh’s “From Revolution to Dissent: A Case Study of the Changing Role of Theatre and Activism in Bengal,” offers an historical analysis of playwrights Utpal Dutt and Debesh Chattopadhyay and the Naxalbari movement in the 1960s in Bengal. Ghosh posits that both artists emerged in the sixties as performers, activists, and intellectuals, using theatre to challenge the political and social status quo. They created a Bengali theatre that was “a component of civil society, a space in which political battles and future dreams would be reflected” (p. 40). However, as the seventies drew on, progressive","PeriodicalId":42841,"journal":{"name":"ASIAN THEATRE JOURNAL","volume":"55 1","pages":"403 - 405"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASIAN THEATRE JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/atj.2022.0027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This volume arose out of the Political Performances Working Group of IFTR, offering fourteen essays concerning political performances in Finland, the United Kingdom, Malta, Turkey, Belarus, Poland, Estonia, South Africa, India, and China. It is the last two that would be of interest to readers of this journal, although the entire volume is interesting and readable. At heart, by “political theatre” the editors here refer to theatre in response to political oppression and social injustice. The volume is divided into two sections. The first considers “the relationship between performance and activism” and the second concerns “current debates in and around political theatre” (p. 4). In part one the Asianist will find two essays of particular interest. The first, Pujya Ghosh’s “From Revolution to Dissent: A Case Study of the Changing Role of Theatre and Activism in Bengal,” offers an historical analysis of playwrights Utpal Dutt and Debesh Chattopadhyay and the Naxalbari movement in the 1960s in Bengal. Ghosh posits that both artists emerged in the sixties as performers, activists, and intellectuals, using theatre to challenge the political and social status quo. They created a Bengali theatre that was “a component of civil society, a space in which political battles and future dreams would be reflected” (p. 40). However, as the seventies drew on, progressive
世界政治戏剧与表演:理论、历史与实践,作者:Mireia Aragay、Paola Botham和josjos Ramón普拉多-帕扎雷兹(评论)
这本书是由IFTR的政治表演工作组提出的,提供了14篇关于芬兰、英国、马耳他、土耳其、白俄罗斯、波兰、爱沙尼亚、南非、印度和中国的政治表演的文章。这是最后两个,将感兴趣的读者本杂志,尽管整个卷是有趣的和可读的。从本质上讲,这里的编辑所说的“政治戏剧”指的是对政治压迫和社会不公的回应。全书分为两个部分。第一部分考虑“表演与行动主义之间的关系”,第二部分关注“当前围绕政治戏剧的辩论”(第4页)。在第一部分中,亚洲主义者会发现两篇特别有趣的文章。第一本是Pujya Ghosh的《从革命到异议:孟加拉戏剧和激进主义角色变化的案例研究》,对剧作家Utpal Dutt和Debesh Chattopadhyay以及20世纪60年代孟加拉的纳萨尔巴里运动进行了历史分析。高希认为,这两位艺术家都是在60年代以表演者、活动家和知识分子的身份出现的,他们用戏剧来挑战政治和社会现状。他们创造了一个孟加拉剧院,它是“公民社会的一个组成部分,是反映政治斗争和未来梦想的空间”(第40页)。然而,随着七十年代的到来,进步
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信