Like a Pig in Mud: Rejecting the Manicured Boundaries of the Patriarchy

S. Weiser, Linsay DeMartino, Alyssa Stasicky
{"title":"Like a Pig in Mud: Rejecting the Manicured Boundaries of the Patriarchy","authors":"S. Weiser, Linsay DeMartino, Alyssa Stasicky","doi":"10.1177/10526846221149218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How do school leaders make sense of the mess of the regimes of the normal (Warner, 1993) when they themselves are beyond the norm? While we may be beyond the normal, we are also “awash in the flow of the everyday” (Manalansan, 2018, p. 2). Though we may resist and see ourselves as beyond the norm (Weiser et al., 2019), we are never “in a position of exteriority in relation” (Foucault, 1978, p. 95) to the norms of power. Using data from several different projects collected over the past several years, we conceptualize a new way to consider not only data, but also how embracing new formations of leadership, which may appear messy, can work toward liberatory praxis. Drawing upon our archive of previous projects (DeMartino & Weiser, 2021; Weiser, 2018; Weiser et al., 2019, DeMartino, 2020) that have been published, as well as completed but not-yet-published projects, we funk (Warner, 1993) up our relations to these archives (Cvetkovich, 2003; Manalansan, 2014) to uncover how we have been engaged in the act of making a mess through our research. Parallel to the idea of failure as distinctly queer (Halberstam, 2011),we aim to understand how engaging in the messiness of identity-based research using art and visual methods (Leavy, 2017) can provide pathways forward for educational leaders who are willing to get dirty in order to support members of the educational community who do not fit cleanly into cisheteropatriarchal standards.","PeriodicalId":92928,"journal":{"name":"Journal of school leadership","volume":"55 1","pages":"214 - 236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of school leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10526846221149218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How do school leaders make sense of the mess of the regimes of the normal (Warner, 1993) when they themselves are beyond the norm? While we may be beyond the normal, we are also “awash in the flow of the everyday” (Manalansan, 2018, p. 2). Though we may resist and see ourselves as beyond the norm (Weiser et al., 2019), we are never “in a position of exteriority in relation” (Foucault, 1978, p. 95) to the norms of power. Using data from several different projects collected over the past several years, we conceptualize a new way to consider not only data, but also how embracing new formations of leadership, which may appear messy, can work toward liberatory praxis. Drawing upon our archive of previous projects (DeMartino & Weiser, 2021; Weiser, 2018; Weiser et al., 2019, DeMartino, 2020) that have been published, as well as completed but not-yet-published projects, we funk (Warner, 1993) up our relations to these archives (Cvetkovich, 2003; Manalansan, 2014) to uncover how we have been engaged in the act of making a mess through our research. Parallel to the idea of failure as distinctly queer (Halberstam, 2011),we aim to understand how engaging in the messiness of identity-based research using art and visual methods (Leavy, 2017) can provide pathways forward for educational leaders who are willing to get dirty in order to support members of the educational community who do not fit cleanly into cisheteropatriarchal standards.
像泥里的猪:拒绝父权制的边界
当学校的领导们自己已经超越了规范,他们如何理解正常政权的混乱(Warner, 1993) ?虽然我们可能超出了正常,但我们也“淹没在日常生活的洪流中”(Manalansan, 2018,第2页)。尽管我们可能会抵制并认为自己超出了规范(Weiser等人,2019),但我们从未“处于与权力规范相关的外部性位置”(福柯,1978,第95页)。利用过去几年收集的几个不同项目的数据,我们概念化了一种新的方式,不仅考虑数据,而且考虑如何拥抱新的领导形式,这些形式可能看起来很混乱,可以走向解放的实践。借鉴我们以前的项目档案(DeMartino & Weiser, 2021;魏瑟,2018;Weiser等人,2019,DeMartino, 2020)已经发表的,以及完成但尚未发表的项目,我们将我们与这些档案的关系联系起来(Warner, 1993) (Cvetkovich, 2003;Manalansan, 2014)通过我们的研究揭示我们是如何参与制造混乱的行为的。与“失败是一种明显的酷儿”(Halberstam, 2011)的观点平行,我们的目标是理解如何利用艺术和视觉方法(利维,2017)参与基于身份的混乱研究,为那些愿意为了支持那些不完全符合异性恋父权制标准的教育界成员而变得肮脏的教育领导者提供前进的道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信