Evaluation of Performance Among Norovirus Antigen Detection Kits with Immunochromatography

Yuki Sato, M. Shinagawa, Yusuke Takahashi, Masachika Saeki, Yuki Yakuwa, S. Takahashi
{"title":"Evaluation of Performance Among Norovirus Antigen Detection Kits with Immunochromatography","authors":"Yuki Sato, M. Shinagawa, Yusuke Takahashi, Masachika Saeki, Yuki Yakuwa, S. Takahashi","doi":"10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi.92.120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have evaluated the performance among four brands of immunochromatography (IC) assay kits, available in the market in Japan, for detection of norovirus antigen and compared with Real Time PCR (RT-PCR) assays. The four brands used were ImmunoCatch-Noro (A Kit, EIKEN CHEMICAL Co., Ltd., Japan), Quick Chaser-Noro (B Kit, MIZUHO MEDY Co., Ltd., Saga, Japan), GE test Noro Nissui (C Kit, NISSUI PHARMACEUTICAL Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), and Quick Navi-Noro2 (D Kit, DENKA SEIKEN Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The results from the RT-PCR analysis of 69 suspected cases of norovirus infection identified 6 cases of Genogroup I (GI) and 22 cases of Genogroup II (GII) infection, whereas one case among them had a mixed infection of both GI and GII. The virus titers of the positive samples varied from 1.54×10 1 to 3.14× 10 8 copies/ μ L. The genotypes identified were as follows:GI, GI.1 (1 case each), GI.2 (3 cases), and GI.3 (2 cases);GII, GII.2 (1 case each), GII.4 (7 cases), GII.13 (2 cases), and GII.17 (12 cases). The positive concordance rates between the IC assay kits and the Real Time RT-PCR were as follows:A, 59.3 % ;B, 51.9 % ;C, 51.9 % ;and","PeriodicalId":17724,"journal":{"name":"Kansenshogaku zasshi. The Journal of the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kansenshogaku zasshi. The Journal of the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi.92.120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We have evaluated the performance among four brands of immunochromatography (IC) assay kits, available in the market in Japan, for detection of norovirus antigen and compared with Real Time PCR (RT-PCR) assays. The four brands used were ImmunoCatch-Noro (A Kit, EIKEN CHEMICAL Co., Ltd., Japan), Quick Chaser-Noro (B Kit, MIZUHO MEDY Co., Ltd., Saga, Japan), GE test Noro Nissui (C Kit, NISSUI PHARMACEUTICAL Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), and Quick Navi-Noro2 (D Kit, DENKA SEIKEN Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The results from the RT-PCR analysis of 69 suspected cases of norovirus infection identified 6 cases of Genogroup I (GI) and 22 cases of Genogroup II (GII) infection, whereas one case among them had a mixed infection of both GI and GII. The virus titers of the positive samples varied from 1.54×10 1 to 3.14× 10 8 copies/ μ L. The genotypes identified were as follows:GI, GI.1 (1 case each), GI.2 (3 cases), and GI.3 (2 cases);GII, GII.2 (1 case each), GII.4 (7 cases), GII.13 (2 cases), and GII.17 (12 cases). The positive concordance rates between the IC assay kits and the Real Time RT-PCR were as follows:A, 59.3 % ;B, 51.9 % ;C, 51.9 % ;and
免疫层析法检测诺如病毒抗原试剂盒的性能评价
我们评估了日本市场上四种品牌的免疫层析(IC)检测试剂盒检测诺如病毒抗原的性能,并与实时PCR (RT-PCR)检测方法进行了比较。使用的四个品牌分别是immunocapture -Noro (A试剂盒,EIKEN CHEMICAL Co., Ltd.,日本)、Quick Chaser-Noro (B试剂盒,MIZUHO medicine Co., Ltd., Saga,日本)、GE test Noro Nissui (C试剂盒,Nissui PHARMACEUTICAL Co., Ltd.,日本东京)和Quick Navi-Noro2 (D试剂盒,DENKA SEIKEN Co., Ltd.,日本东京)。对69例诺如病毒疑似感染病例进行RT-PCR分析,鉴定为基因I型(GI)感染6例,基因II型(GII)感染22例,其中1例为GI和GII混合感染。阳性标本的病毒滴度为1.54×10 1 ~ 3.14× 10 8拷贝/ μ l,鉴定的基因型为GI、GI.1(各1例)、GI.2(3例)和GI.3(2例);GII、GII.2(各1例)、GII.4(7例)、GII.13(2例)和GII.17(12例)。IC试剂盒与Real Time RT-PCR的阳性符合率分别为:A, 59.3%;B, 51.9%;C, 51.9%
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信