Análisis ético-político de los espaciamientos cognitivos, morales y estéticos

IF 0.3 0 PHILOSOPHY

Cinta de Moebio Pub Date : 2019-04-23 DOI:10.4067/S0717-554X2019000100132

Jesús Girado

{"title":"Análisis ético-político de los espaciamientos cognitivos, morales y estéticos","authors":"Jesús Girado","doi":"10.4067/S0717-554X2019000100132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolResumen: Este articulo presenta un analisis etico-politico del fenomeno de discriminacion como consecuencia de lo que Bauman llama espaciamientos sociales (cognitivos, morales y esteticos), explorando ademas las consecuencias biopoliticas que se derivan de estos. El soporte filosofico ha sido estructurado a partir de autores como Rorty, Walzer, Simmel, Nussbaum y Esposito, recurriendo al dialogo interdisciplinar con horizontes teoricos como los de la antropologia social y la sociologia. El aporte significativo de este texto esta en que profundiza y amplia desde la filosofia la teoria de los espaciamientos sociales, recurriendo a conceptos como circulo del nosotros, fantasia de pureza, conciencia de inadecuacion y experiencia emocional. EnglishAbstract: This paper presents an ethical-political analysis of the phenomenon of discrimination because of what Bauman calls social spacing (cognitive, moral and aesthetic), also exploring the biopolitical consequences derived from these. The philosophical support has been structured from authors like Rorty, Walzer, Simmel, Nussbaum and Esposito, resorting to interdisciplinary dialogue with theoretical horizons such as those of social anthropology and sociology. The significant contribution of this text is that it deepens and broadens the theory of social spacing from philosophy, using concepts such as circle of us, fantasy of purity, awareness of inadequacy, and emotional experience.","PeriodicalId":54112,"journal":{"name":"Cinta de Moebio","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cinta de Moebio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-554X2019000100132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Abstract

espanolResumen: Este articulo presenta un analisis etico-politico del fenomeno de discriminacion como consecuencia de lo que Bauman llama espaciamientos sociales (cognitivos, morales y esteticos), explorando ademas las consecuencias biopoliticas que se derivan de estos. El soporte filosofico ha sido estructurado a partir de autores como Rorty, Walzer, Simmel, Nussbaum y Esposito, recurriendo al dialogo interdisciplinar con horizontes teoricos como los de la antropologia social y la sociologia. El aporte significativo de este texto esta en que profundiza y amplia desde la filosofia la teoria de los espaciamientos sociales, recurriendo a conceptos como circulo del nosotros, fantasia de pureza, conciencia de inadecuacion y experiencia emocional. EnglishAbstract: This paper presents an ethical-political analysis of the phenomenon of discrimination because of what Bauman calls social spacing (cognitive, moral and aesthetic), also exploring the biopolitical consequences derived from these. The philosophical support has been structured from authors like Rorty, Walzer, Simmel, Nussbaum and Esposito, resorting to interdisciplinary dialogue with theoretical horizons such as those of social anthropology and sociology. The significant contribution of this text is that it deepens and broadens the theory of social spacing from philosophy, using concepts such as circle of us, fantasy of purity, awareness of inadequacy, and emotional experience.

查看原文本刊更多论文

认知、道德与审美空间的伦理政治分析

摘要:本文对鲍曼所谓的社会空间(认知、道德和审美)所导致的歧视现象进行了伦理-政治分析，并探讨了由此产生的生物政治后果。在这篇文章中，我们提出了一种理论方法，通过这种方法，我们可以从社会人类学和社会学的角度，通过对社会人类学和社会学等理论领域的跨学科对话，构建哲学支持。本文的主要贡献在于，它从哲学的角度深化和扩展了社会空间理论，运用了“我们的圈”、“纯洁的幻想”、“不足意识”和“情感体验”等概念。英文:本文对鲍曼所说的社会空间(认知、道德和审美)所造成的歧视现象进行了伦理-政治分析，并探讨了由此产生的生物政治后果。一直初级from The philosophical支持authors像Rorty Walzer, Simmel、奥努斯鲍姆和埃斯波西托,借助跨学科对话理论horizons如of anthropology and sociology社会的人。The开展对of this text is that it deepens and broadens The theory of using spacing from philosophy社会概念如ole - us、fantasy of purity认识不充分,and emotional experience。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Cinta de Moebio PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

24 weeks

期刊介绍： Cinta de Moebio publishes scientific articles and essays on epistemology of social science. The editorial experience of the magazine indicates that some academics send articles of philosophy, but of issues that are not related to the social sciences, as well as academics who sent the results of their research or projects in the social sciences, but its focus is not epistemology, which also are geared out to the purpose of the journal. The journal, put it in some way, it is in the dialogue of philosophy with social science and, therefore, both domains must be present in the articles.