Buyer behaviour and price expectations: a spatial analysis of the Athens residential market

IF 1.3 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
M. White, D. Papastamos
{"title":"Buyer behaviour and price expectations: a spatial analysis of the Athens residential market","authors":"M. White, D. Papastamos","doi":"10.1108/jerer-03-2020-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper examines the price setting behaviour over time and space in the Athens residential market. In periods of house price inflation asking prices are often based upon the last observed highest selling price achieved for a similar property in the same micro-location. However, in a falling market, prices may be rigid downwards and less sensitive to the most recent transaction prices, weakening spatial effects. Furthermore, the paper considers whether future price expectations affect price setting behaviour.Design/methodology/approachThe paper employs a dataset of approximately 24,500 property values from 2007 until 2014 in Athens incorporating characteristics and locational variables. The authors begin by estimating a baseline hedonic price model using property characteristics, neighbourhood amenities and location effects. Following this, a spatio-temporal autoregressive (STAR) model is estimated. Running separate models, the authors account for spatial dependence from historic valuations, contemporaneous peer effects and expectations effects.FindingsThe initial STAR model shows significant spatial and temporal effects, the former remaining important in a falling market contrasting with previous literature findings. In the second STAR model, whilst past sales effects remain significant although smaller, contemporaneous and price expectations effects are also found to be significant, the latter capturing anchoring and slow adjustment heuristics in price setting behaviour.Research limitations/implicationsAs valuations used in the database are based upon comparable sales, then in the recessionary periods covered in the dataset, finding comparables may have become more difficult, and hence this, in turn, may have impacted on valuation accuracy.Practical implicationsIn addition to past effects, contemporaneous transactions and expected future values need to be taken in consideration in analysing spatial interactions in housing markets. These factors will influence housing markets in different cities and countries.Social implicationsThe information content of property valuations should more carefully consider the relative importance of different components of asking prices.Originality/valueThis is the first paper to use transactions data over a period of falling house prices in Athens and to consider current and future values in addition to past values in a spatio-temporal context.","PeriodicalId":44570,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Real Estate Research","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Real Estate Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jerer-03-2020-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis paper examines the price setting behaviour over time and space in the Athens residential market. In periods of house price inflation asking prices are often based upon the last observed highest selling price achieved for a similar property in the same micro-location. However, in a falling market, prices may be rigid downwards and less sensitive to the most recent transaction prices, weakening spatial effects. Furthermore, the paper considers whether future price expectations affect price setting behaviour.Design/methodology/approachThe paper employs a dataset of approximately 24,500 property values from 2007 until 2014 in Athens incorporating characteristics and locational variables. The authors begin by estimating a baseline hedonic price model using property characteristics, neighbourhood amenities and location effects. Following this, a spatio-temporal autoregressive (STAR) model is estimated. Running separate models, the authors account for spatial dependence from historic valuations, contemporaneous peer effects and expectations effects.FindingsThe initial STAR model shows significant spatial and temporal effects, the former remaining important in a falling market contrasting with previous literature findings. In the second STAR model, whilst past sales effects remain significant although smaller, contemporaneous and price expectations effects are also found to be significant, the latter capturing anchoring and slow adjustment heuristics in price setting behaviour.Research limitations/implicationsAs valuations used in the database are based upon comparable sales, then in the recessionary periods covered in the dataset, finding comparables may have become more difficult, and hence this, in turn, may have impacted on valuation accuracy.Practical implicationsIn addition to past effects, contemporaneous transactions and expected future values need to be taken in consideration in analysing spatial interactions in housing markets. These factors will influence housing markets in different cities and countries.Social implicationsThe information content of property valuations should more carefully consider the relative importance of different components of asking prices.Originality/valueThis is the first paper to use transactions data over a period of falling house prices in Athens and to consider current and future values in addition to past values in a spatio-temporal context.
买家行为和价格预期:雅典住宅市场的空间分析
本文考察了雅典住宅市场的价格设定行为随时间和空间的变化。在房价上涨时期,要价通常是基于最近观察到的同一微型区域内类似房产的最高售价。然而,在下跌的市场中,价格可能是刚性向下的,对最近的交易价格不太敏感,削弱了空间效应。此外,本文还考虑了未来价格预期是否会影响价格设定行为。设计/方法/方法本文采用了2007年至2014年雅典约24,500处房产价值的数据集,包括特征和位置变量。作者首先利用房产特征、社区便利设施和地理位置效应估算了一个享乐价格的基线模型。在此基础上,估计了时空自回归(STAR)模型。通过运行不同的模型,作者解释了历史估值、同期同行效应和预期效应的空间依赖性。初步的STAR模型显示了显著的空间和时间效应,与先前的文献发现相比,前者在下跌的市场中仍然重要。在第二个STAR模型中,虽然过去的销售效应仍然显著,但较小的同期和价格预期效应也很显著,后者在价格设定行为中捕捉锚定和缓慢调整启发式。研究限制/影响由于数据库中使用的估值是基于可比销售,因此在数据集中涵盖的经济衰退时期,寻找可比产品可能会变得更加困难,因此这反过来可能会影响估值的准确性。在分析住房市场的空间相互作用时,除了过去的影响外,还需要考虑同期交易和预期的未来价值。这些因素将影响不同城市和国家的房地产市场。社会意义房地产估价的信息内容应更仔细地考虑要价的不同组成部分的相对重要性。原创性/价值这是第一篇使用雅典房价下跌期间的交易数据,并在时空背景下考虑当前和未来价值以及过去价值的论文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信