Rig Time Optimization During Workover by Predefined Well Integrity Criteria Using MAASP Sensitivity Analysis

A. Yugay, Fawad Zain Yousfi, A. Jaiyeola
{"title":"Rig Time Optimization During Workover by Predefined Well Integrity Criteria Using MAASP Sensitivity Analysis","authors":"A. Yugay, Fawad Zain Yousfi, A. Jaiyeola","doi":"10.2118/192924-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n During normal rig workover operations, once the old completion is retrieved, corrosion log is being executed to check the condition of the casing and/or liner as one of the means to establish a way forward. Decision can be made easily in case of pipe found completely corroded or absolutely intact. However, such clear scenarios are not always the case and the decision making takes significant time, specially if corrosion log results are received at night time or during the week end. It may become a subject of hot discussion between involved stakeholders, trying to find a right balance between safety and operations. Therefore Gas Development Operations Subsurface Team of ADNOC Onshore requested Technical Center Well Integrity Team to identify clear criteria in advance, to save rig time and improve business performance and decision making process. Based on this request Technical Center developed a strategy of predefined well integrity criteria's that are being successfully used now, saving rig time during workover and avoiding conflicts between teams in questionable situations.\n The method is based on several factors: Maximum Allowable Annulus Surface Pressure (MAASP) calculation as per Norsok D10 standard, application of Double Barrier concept for Secondary Well Barrier Envelope, sensitivity analysis based on MAASP degradation and remained wall thickness of casing and/or liner. This method has already been successfully implemented in several wells during workover operations saving time for decision making. It is planned to be included in the next release of corporate procedures.\n Method, explained in this paper can be used as a guideline by all petroleum engineers, drilling engineers, well integrity engineers and petrophysicists who are involved in workover operations, helping them to improve decision making process based on the results of the casing corrosion logs. In addition, the subject of well life prediction and well life extension in standard Company well design is covered, with focus on safety during workover operations.","PeriodicalId":11014,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, November 12, 2018","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, November 12, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/192924-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During normal rig workover operations, once the old completion is retrieved, corrosion log is being executed to check the condition of the casing and/or liner as one of the means to establish a way forward. Decision can be made easily in case of pipe found completely corroded or absolutely intact. However, such clear scenarios are not always the case and the decision making takes significant time, specially if corrosion log results are received at night time or during the week end. It may become a subject of hot discussion between involved stakeholders, trying to find a right balance between safety and operations. Therefore Gas Development Operations Subsurface Team of ADNOC Onshore requested Technical Center Well Integrity Team to identify clear criteria in advance, to save rig time and improve business performance and decision making process. Based on this request Technical Center developed a strategy of predefined well integrity criteria's that are being successfully used now, saving rig time during workover and avoiding conflicts between teams in questionable situations. The method is based on several factors: Maximum Allowable Annulus Surface Pressure (MAASP) calculation as per Norsok D10 standard, application of Double Barrier concept for Secondary Well Barrier Envelope, sensitivity analysis based on MAASP degradation and remained wall thickness of casing and/or liner. This method has already been successfully implemented in several wells during workover operations saving time for decision making. It is planned to be included in the next release of corporate procedures. Method, explained in this paper can be used as a guideline by all petroleum engineers, drilling engineers, well integrity engineers and petrophysicists who are involved in workover operations, helping them to improve decision making process based on the results of the casing corrosion logs. In addition, the subject of well life prediction and well life extension in standard Company well design is covered, with focus on safety during workover operations.
利用MAASP敏感性分析,通过预定义的井完整性标准优化修井期间的钻机时间
在正常的钻机修井作业中,一旦回收旧完井工具,就会执行腐蚀测井,以检查套管和/或尾管的状况,作为确定下一步措施的手段之一。在发现管道完全腐蚀或完全完好的情况下,可以很容易地做出决定。然而,这种明确的情况并不总是如此,决策需要花费大量时间,特别是如果腐蚀测井结果是在夜间或周末收到的。它可能成为相关利益相关者之间热议的话题,试图在安全和运营之间找到一个正确的平衡。因此,ADNOC陆上天然气开发作业地下团队要求技术中心井完整性团队提前确定明确的标准,以节省钻机时间,提高业务绩效和决策过程。根据这一要求,技术中心制定了一套预定义的井完整性标准策略,目前已成功使用,节省了修井期间的钻机时间,避免了团队之间在有问题的情况下发生冲突。该方法基于以下几个因素:根据Norsok D10标准计算最大允许环空表面压力(MAASP),应用双屏障概念进行二次井隔离包层,基于MAASP降解和套管和/或尾管剩余壁厚的敏感性分析。该方法已在修井作业中成功应用于多口井,节省了决策时间。计划将其纳入公司程序的下一个版本。本文介绍的方法可以作为所有参与修井作业的石油工程师、钻井工程师、井完整性工程师和岩石物理学家的指导方针,帮助他们根据套管腐蚀测井结果改进决策过程。此外,还涵盖了标准公司井设计中的井寿命预测和井寿命延长主题,重点是修井作业期间的安全问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信