Infertility and assisted reproductive technologies in Serbia

Q3 Social Sciences
M. Rasevic, Katarina Sedlecky
{"title":"Infertility and assisted reproductive technologies in Serbia","authors":"M. Rasevic, Katarina Sedlecky","doi":"10.2298/stnv220418002r","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Infertility is a significant challenge, both on individual and macro levels. The overall aim of this paper is to contribute to better understanding infertility in Serbia by analysing relevant policies and programmes, data on the epidemiology of infertility, health services, and research findings. The investigation is grounded in the action research methodology, which is built on a shared process of reflection between researchers and participants on selected data and documents. The legal framework reflects modern approaches to a number of challenges in this area. Since the end of 2006, the Republic Health Insurance Fund (RHIF) has been financing the National Infertility Treatment Program with biomedically assisted reproduction (BMAR) procedures. The data on the epidemiology of infertility is not sufficiently addressed in health statistics and representative research. The quality of infertility treatment in Serbia is on par with developed countries, but it doesn?t include the donation of reproductive cells and surrogacy. There is also a lack of research on various aspects of infertility in Serbia from the perspective of different scientific disciplines. It is also hard to understand why, despite considerable possibilities for individual solutions to the problem of infertility in Serbia, the share of children born from BMAR procedures is relatively low.","PeriodicalId":35694,"journal":{"name":"Stanovnistvo","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stanovnistvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/stnv220418002r","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Infertility is a significant challenge, both on individual and macro levels. The overall aim of this paper is to contribute to better understanding infertility in Serbia by analysing relevant policies and programmes, data on the epidemiology of infertility, health services, and research findings. The investigation is grounded in the action research methodology, which is built on a shared process of reflection between researchers and participants on selected data and documents. The legal framework reflects modern approaches to a number of challenges in this area. Since the end of 2006, the Republic Health Insurance Fund (RHIF) has been financing the National Infertility Treatment Program with biomedically assisted reproduction (BMAR) procedures. The data on the epidemiology of infertility is not sufficiently addressed in health statistics and representative research. The quality of infertility treatment in Serbia is on par with developed countries, but it doesn?t include the donation of reproductive cells and surrogacy. There is also a lack of research on various aspects of infertility in Serbia from the perspective of different scientific disciplines. It is also hard to understand why, despite considerable possibilities for individual solutions to the problem of infertility in Serbia, the share of children born from BMAR procedures is relatively low.
塞尔维亚的不孕和辅助生殖技术
不孕症在个人和宏观层面上都是一个重大挑战。本文的总体目标是通过分析相关政策和方案、不孕症流行病学数据、卫生服务和研究结果,促进更好地了解塞尔维亚的不孕症。调查以行动研究方法为基础,该方法建立在研究人员和参与者对选定数据和文件进行共同反思的过程之上。法律框架反映了对这一领域的一些挑战采取的现代办法。自2006年底以来,共和国健康保险基金(RHIF)一直通过生物医学辅助生殖(BMAR)程序资助国家不孕症治疗方案。关于不孕症流行病学的数据在卫生统计和代表性研究中没有得到充分处理。塞尔维亚的不孕症治疗质量与发达国家相当,但事实并非如此。包括捐赠生殖细胞和代孕。从不同科学学科的角度对塞尔维亚不孕症的各个方面也缺乏研究。同样难以理解的是,尽管塞尔维亚的不孕症问题有很大的个别解决办法,但通过BMAR手术出生的儿童比例相对较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stanovnistvo
Stanovnistvo Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信