Stochastic Last-Mile Delivery with Crowd-Shipping and Mobile Depots

Kianoush Mousavi, Merve Bodur, M. Roorda
{"title":"Stochastic Last-Mile Delivery with Crowd-Shipping and Mobile Depots","authors":"Kianoush Mousavi, Merve Bodur, M. Roorda","doi":"10.1287/trsc.2021.1088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes a two-tier last-mile delivery model that optimally selects mobile depot locations in advance of full information about the availability of crowd-shippers and then transfers packages to crowd-shippers for the final shipment to the customers. Uncertainty in crowd-shipper availability is incorporated by modeling the problem as a two-stage stochastic integer program. Enhanced decomposition solution algorithms including branch-and-cut and cut-and-project frameworks are developed. A risk-averse approach is compared against a risk-neutral approach by assessing conditional-value-at-risk. A detailed computational study based on the City of Toronto is conducted. The deterministic version of the model outperforms a capacitated vehicle routing problem on average by 20%. For the stochastic model, decomposition algorithms usually discover near-optimal solutions within two hours for instances up to a size of 30 mobile depot locations, 40 customers, and 120 crowd-shippers. The cut-and-project approach outperforms the branch-and-cut approach by up to 85% in the risk-averse setting in certain instances. The stochastic model provides solutions that are 3.35%–6.08% better than the deterministic model, and the improvements are magnified with increased uncertainty in crowd-shipper availability. A risk-averse approach leads the operator to send more mobile depots or postpone customer deliveries to reduce the risk of high penalties for nondelivery.","PeriodicalId":23247,"journal":{"name":"Transp. Sci.","volume":"20 1","pages":"612-630"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transp. Sci.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2021.1088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

This paper proposes a two-tier last-mile delivery model that optimally selects mobile depot locations in advance of full information about the availability of crowd-shippers and then transfers packages to crowd-shippers for the final shipment to the customers. Uncertainty in crowd-shipper availability is incorporated by modeling the problem as a two-stage stochastic integer program. Enhanced decomposition solution algorithms including branch-and-cut and cut-and-project frameworks are developed. A risk-averse approach is compared against a risk-neutral approach by assessing conditional-value-at-risk. A detailed computational study based on the City of Toronto is conducted. The deterministic version of the model outperforms a capacitated vehicle routing problem on average by 20%. For the stochastic model, decomposition algorithms usually discover near-optimal solutions within two hours for instances up to a size of 30 mobile depot locations, 40 customers, and 120 crowd-shippers. The cut-and-project approach outperforms the branch-and-cut approach by up to 85% in the risk-averse setting in certain instances. The stochastic model provides solutions that are 3.35%–6.08% better than the deterministic model, and the improvements are magnified with increased uncertainty in crowd-shipper availability. A risk-averse approach leads the operator to send more mobile depots or postpone customer deliveries to reduce the risk of high penalties for nondelivery.
随机最后一英里运输与人群运输和移动仓库
本文提出了一种两层最后一英里配送模型,该模型在充分了解人群托运人的可用性之前,最优地选择移动仓库位置,然后将包裹转移给人群托运人,以便最终运送到客户手中。通过将问题建模为两阶段随机整数规划,纳入了人群托运人可用性的不确定性。开发了改进的分解解算法,包括分支-切割和切割-项目框架。通过评估有条件的风险价值,将风险厌恶方法与风险中性方法进行比较。以多伦多市为例进行了详细的计算研究。该模型的确定性版本比有能力车辆路径问题的平均性能高出20%。对于随机模型,分解算法通常在两个小时内发现接近最优的解决方案,例如30个移动仓库位置,40个客户和120个人群运输船。在某些情况下,在规避风险的情况下,切割-项目方法比分支-切割方法的性能高出85%。随机模型提供的解比确定性模型的解好3.35% ~ 6.08%,并且随着人群运输可获得性不确定性的增加,改进效果被放大。规避风险的方法导致运营商派遣更多的移动仓库或推迟客户交付,以降低因未交付而遭受高额罚款的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信