Simultaneous False-Decision Error Rates in Master Protocols with Shared Control: False Discovery Rate Perspective

Jingjing Ye, X. Li, Cheng Lu, William Wang
{"title":"Simultaneous False-Decision Error Rates in Master Protocols with Shared Control: False Discovery Rate Perspective","authors":"Jingjing Ye, X. Li, Cheng Lu, William Wang","doi":"10.51387/23-nejsds28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Master protocol is a type of trial designs where multiple therapies and/or multiple disease populations can be investigated in the same trial. A shared control can be used for multiple therapies to gain operational efficiency and gain attraction to patients. To balance between controlling for false positive rate and having adequate power for detecting true signals, the impact of False Discovery Rate (FDR) is evaluated when multiple investigational drugs are studied in the master protocol. With the shared control group, the “random high” or “random low” in the control group can potentially impact all hypotheses testing that compare each of the test regimens and the control group in terms of probability of having at least one positive hypothesis outcome, or multiple positive outcomes. When regulatory agencies make the decision of approving or declining one or more regimens based on the master protocol design, this introduces a different type of error: simultaneous false-decision error. In this manuscript, we examine in detail the derivations and properties of the simultaneous false-decision error in the master protocol with shared control under the framework of FDR. The simultaneous false-decision error consists of two parts: simultaneous false-discovery rate (SFDR) and simultaneous false non-discovery rate (SFNR). Based on our analytical evaluation and simulations, the magnitude of SFDR and SFNR inflation is small. Therefore, the multiple error rate controls are generally adequate, further adjustment to a pre-specified level on SFDR or SFNR or reduce the alpha allocated to each individual treatment comparison to the shared control is deemed unnecessary.","PeriodicalId":94360,"journal":{"name":"The New England Journal of Statistics in Data Science","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The New England Journal of Statistics in Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51387/23-nejsds28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Master protocol is a type of trial designs where multiple therapies and/or multiple disease populations can be investigated in the same trial. A shared control can be used for multiple therapies to gain operational efficiency and gain attraction to patients. To balance between controlling for false positive rate and having adequate power for detecting true signals, the impact of False Discovery Rate (FDR) is evaluated when multiple investigational drugs are studied in the master protocol. With the shared control group, the “random high” or “random low” in the control group can potentially impact all hypotheses testing that compare each of the test regimens and the control group in terms of probability of having at least one positive hypothesis outcome, or multiple positive outcomes. When regulatory agencies make the decision of approving or declining one or more regimens based on the master protocol design, this introduces a different type of error: simultaneous false-decision error. In this manuscript, we examine in detail the derivations and properties of the simultaneous false-decision error in the master protocol with shared control under the framework of FDR. The simultaneous false-decision error consists of two parts: simultaneous false-discovery rate (SFDR) and simultaneous false non-discovery rate (SFNR). Based on our analytical evaluation and simulations, the magnitude of SFDR and SFNR inflation is small. Therefore, the multiple error rate controls are generally adequate, further adjustment to a pre-specified level on SFDR or SFNR or reduce the alpha allocated to each individual treatment comparison to the shared control is deemed unnecessary.
具有共享控制的主协议中的同时错误决策错误率:错误发现率的观点
主方案是一种试验设计,在同一试验中可以研究多种疗法和/或多种疾病人群。共享控制可以用于多种治疗,以提高操作效率,并获得对患者的吸引力。为了在控制假阳性率和具有足够的检测真信号的能力之间取得平衡,在主方案中研究多种研究药物时,评估假发现率(FDR)的影响。在共享的对照组中,对照组中的“随机高”或“随机低”可能会影响所有的假设测试,这些假设测试是比较每个测试方案和对照组至少有一个积极假设结果或多个积极结果的概率。当监管机构根据主协议设计决定批准或拒绝一个或多个方案时,这引入了另一种类型的错误:同时错误决策错误。在本文中,我们详细研究了在FDR框架下具有共享控制的主协议中同时假决策误差的推导和性质。同时错误决策误差由两部分组成:同时错误发现率(SFDR)和同时错误不发现率(SFNR)。根据我们的分析评估和模拟,SFDR和SFNR膨胀的幅度很小。因此,多个错误率控制通常是足够的,进一步调整到SFDR或SFNR的预先指定水平或减少分配给每个单独处理的alpha与共享控制相比是不必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信