Comparing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste Management Scenarios: A case of Palembang, Indonesia

T. Alawiyah
{"title":"Comparing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste Management Scenarios: A case of Palembang, Indonesia","authors":"T. Alawiyah","doi":"10.22135/sje.2023.8.1.42-47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Municipal solid waste (MSW) sector is one of the largest contributors to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This study examines the extent of GHG emissions from five MSW management scenarios in Palembang city, i.e. (a) BAU scenario (existing), where 850.12 tonnes of MSW is disposed in semi-aerobic landfill, 37.73% in open incinerators, 1.17% in 3R facilities, and 61.1% others; (b) Scenario 1, where the landfill is upgraded to a well-managed semi-aerobic; (c) Scenario 2, where 100% collected MSW is disposed in well-managed semi aerobic landfill; (d) Scenario 3, where 70% MSW is disposed in well-managed semi aerobic landfill and 30% is taken to 3R facilities; and (e) Scenario 4, where all collected MSW is treated in incinerators. The methodology for estimating GHG emissions used IPCC 2006 (revised 2019). The result of the analysis shows that the existing condition (BAU) has the highest GHG emissions (730,767 tonnes of CO 2 e). Scenario-4 has the lowest GHG emissions (117,954 tonnes of CO 2 e). Therefore, 3R activities are the most important success factor for reducing GHG emissions in the MSW sector. Further financial and multi-stakeholder studies are essential for a sustainable approach in reducing GHGs emission from MSW management sector.","PeriodicalId":31278,"journal":{"name":"Sriwijaya Journal of Environment","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sriwijaya Journal of Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22135/sje.2023.8.1.42-47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. Municipal solid waste (MSW) sector is one of the largest contributors to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This study examines the extent of GHG emissions from five MSW management scenarios in Palembang city, i.e. (a) BAU scenario (existing), where 850.12 tonnes of MSW is disposed in semi-aerobic landfill, 37.73% in open incinerators, 1.17% in 3R facilities, and 61.1% others; (b) Scenario 1, where the landfill is upgraded to a well-managed semi-aerobic; (c) Scenario 2, where 100% collected MSW is disposed in well-managed semi aerobic landfill; (d) Scenario 3, where 70% MSW is disposed in well-managed semi aerobic landfill and 30% is taken to 3R facilities; and (e) Scenario 4, where all collected MSW is treated in incinerators. The methodology for estimating GHG emissions used IPCC 2006 (revised 2019). The result of the analysis shows that the existing condition (BAU) has the highest GHG emissions (730,767 tonnes of CO 2 e). Scenario-4 has the lowest GHG emissions (117,954 tonnes of CO 2 e). Therefore, 3R activities are the most important success factor for reducing GHG emissions in the MSW sector. Further financial and multi-stakeholder studies are essential for a sustainable approach in reducing GHGs emission from MSW management sector.
比较城市固体废物管理方案的温室气体排放:以印度尼西亚巨港为例
. 城市固体废物(MSW)部门是温室气体(GHG)排放的最大贡献者之一。本研究考察了巨港市五种城市生活垃圾管理方案的温室气体排放程度,即(a) BAU方案(现有),其中850.12吨城市生活垃圾在半好氧填埋场处理,37.73%在露天焚化炉处理,1.17%在3R设施处理,61.1%在其他;(b)方案1,将垃圾填埋场升级为管理良好的半有氧填埋场;(c)方案二,100%收集的都市固体废物在管理良好的半好氧堆填区弃置;(d)方案三,70%都市固体废物在管理良好的半好氧堆填区弃置,30%则运往3R设施;(e)方案四,所有收集的都市固体废物在焚化炉处理。温室气体排放量估算方法采用IPCC 2006(2019年修订)。分析结果显示,现有条件(BAU)的温室气体排放量最高(730,767吨CO 2 e),而情景4的温室气体排放量最低(117,954吨CO 2 e)。因此,3R活动是减少城市固体废物行业温室气体排放的最重要成功因素。进一步的财务和多方利益相关方研究对于采取可持续的方法减少城市固体废物管理部门的温室气体排放至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信