Natural rights: yes and not

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY

Kant Yearbook Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.24923/2222-243x.2022-44.20

Aleksandr Vasilyevich Gribakin

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The author differentiates between the idea of belonging natural rights to people and the concept of natural rights that claims scientific approach. Intuitively feeling as creators of their rights, people periodically shook the thrones. Not knowing the actual sources of people's rights, thinkers of the previous epochs called them natural. It is alleged that the source of people's rights and obligations is their working activity.

查看原文本刊更多论文

自然权利:是，也不是

作者区分了自然权利属于人的概念和主张科学方法的自然权利概念。人们本能地觉得自己是权利的创造者，他们会周期性地动摇权力。在不知道人民权利的真正来源的情况下，以前的思想家称他们是自然的。据称，人的权利和义务的来源是他们的工作活动。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Kant Yearbook PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Kant Yearbook is an international journal that publishes articles, historical or systematic, on the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. It is the yearbook′s goal to intensify innovative research on Kant on the international scale. Articles are double-blind peer reviewed by an internationally renowned editorial board. Each issue is dedicated to a specific topic announced through a call for papers.