“I do have to represent the faith:” An Account of an Ecclesiological Problem When Teaching Philosophy in Ontario’s Catholic High Schools

IF 0.3 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
G. McDonough, Lauren Bialystok, Trevor Norris, L. Pinto
{"title":"“I do have to represent the faith:” An Account of an Ecclesiological Problem When Teaching Philosophy in Ontario’s Catholic High Schools","authors":"G. McDonough, Lauren Bialystok, Trevor Norris, L. Pinto","doi":"10.24908/encounters.v23i0.15688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Canadian province of Ontario introduced philosophy as a secondary school subject in 1995 (Pinto, McDonough, & Boyd, 2009). Since publicly-funded Catholic schools teach approximately 32% of all students in Ontario (Ontario Ministry of Education, 2022), the question arises regarding how teachers in those schools coordinate philosophy and Catholic teachings.  This study employs a secondary analysis of interviews with six teachers from Ontario’s Catholic schools, and employs two of Avery Dulles’ (2002) conceptions of church (institution and mystical communion) to determine how they consider the choices available within their own tradition that could answer this question. Rather than looking only at the shortcomings of treating magisterial teaching as philosophy, this paper argues that there are also conceptual problems that these courses must address in order to improve their ecclesiological adequacy, and illustrates how an apparent null curriculum privileges the institutional ecclesiology.\nKeywords: Catholic education, Catholic school, philosophy, ecclesiology, null curriculum, high school philosophy","PeriodicalId":41777,"journal":{"name":"Encounters in Theory and History of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Encounters in Theory and History of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24908/encounters.v23i0.15688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Canadian province of Ontario introduced philosophy as a secondary school subject in 1995 (Pinto, McDonough, & Boyd, 2009). Since publicly-funded Catholic schools teach approximately 32% of all students in Ontario (Ontario Ministry of Education, 2022), the question arises regarding how teachers in those schools coordinate philosophy and Catholic teachings.  This study employs a secondary analysis of interviews with six teachers from Ontario’s Catholic schools, and employs two of Avery Dulles’ (2002) conceptions of church (institution and mystical communion) to determine how they consider the choices available within their own tradition that could answer this question. Rather than looking only at the shortcomings of treating magisterial teaching as philosophy, this paper argues that there are also conceptual problems that these courses must address in order to improve their ecclesiological adequacy, and illustrates how an apparent null curriculum privileges the institutional ecclesiology. Keywords: Catholic education, Catholic school, philosophy, ecclesiology, null curriculum, high school philosophy
“我必须代表信仰:”在安大略省天主教高中教授哲学时的一个教会问题
加拿大安大略省于1995年将哲学引入中学课程(Pinto, McDonough, & Boyd, 2009)。由于公立天主教学校的学生约占安大略省所有学生的32%(安大略省教育部,2022年),因此出现了关于这些学校的教师如何协调哲学和天主教教义的问题。本研究采用了对来自安大略省天主教学校的六位教师的访谈的二次分析,并采用了Avery Dulles(2002)的两个教会概念(机构和神秘的共食)来确定他们如何考虑在他们自己的传统中可以回答这个问题的选择。本文并非只关注将权威教学视为哲学的缺点,而是认为这些课程必须解决一些概念问题,以提高其教会性的充分性,并说明了一个明显无效的课程如何使机构教会学享有特权。关键词:天主教教育,天主教学校,哲学,教会学,零课程,高中哲学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Encounters in Theory and History of Education
Encounters in Theory and History of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信