Research issues in the design of online communities: report on the CHI 99 workshop

A. Bruckman, J. Donath, T. Erickson, W. Kellogg, B. Wellman
{"title":"Research issues in the design of online communities: report on the CHI 99 workshop","authors":"A. Bruckman, J. Donath, T. Erickson, W. Kellogg, B. Wellman","doi":"10.1145/339290.339296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After brief introductions from each research team, Sara Kiesler got us started by leading a provocative discussion of research methodology. We debated both what questions about online communities are interesting, and what questions are possible to ask given availabIe research methodologies. Some participants prefer to use an experimental methodology grounded in experimental psychoIogy and explore only those questions for which \"rigorous\" quantitative answers are possible. Others prefer a design-oriented approach, which relies primarily on qualitative methods from anthropology such as ethnography. Most attendees felt that a combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches is warranted, and the challenge is how to use these approaches in a complementary fashion. Next, Wendy Kellogg and Tom Edckson tackled issues of the use of online communities for business. They began by leading the group in a 1950's vintage IBM 'spirit' song, reminding us that the concept of community in business and professional settings is not a new one: many businesses have long found utility in invoking \"community\" to increase affiliation, team work, and mutual support. So, while the idea of virtual communities of business or professional colleagues may be relatively new, the impulses driving the ideas are not.","PeriodicalId":7397,"journal":{"name":"ACM SIGCHI Bull.","volume":"42 1","pages":"23-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM SIGCHI Bull.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/339290.339296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

After brief introductions from each research team, Sara Kiesler got us started by leading a provocative discussion of research methodology. We debated both what questions about online communities are interesting, and what questions are possible to ask given availabIe research methodologies. Some participants prefer to use an experimental methodology grounded in experimental psychoIogy and explore only those questions for which "rigorous" quantitative answers are possible. Others prefer a design-oriented approach, which relies primarily on qualitative methods from anthropology such as ethnography. Most attendees felt that a combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches is warranted, and the challenge is how to use these approaches in a complementary fashion. Next, Wendy Kellogg and Tom Edckson tackled issues of the use of online communities for business. They began by leading the group in a 1950's vintage IBM 'spirit' song, reminding us that the concept of community in business and professional settings is not a new one: many businesses have long found utility in invoking "community" to increase affiliation, team work, and mutual support. So, while the idea of virtual communities of business or professional colleagues may be relatively new, the impulses driving the ideas are not.
网络社区设计中的研究问题:CHI 99研讨会报告
在每个研究团队的简短介绍之后,Sara Kiesler带领我们开始了一场关于研究方法的激烈讨论。我们讨论了关于在线社区的哪些问题是有趣的,以及在现有的研究方法下可以提出哪些问题。一些参与者更喜欢使用基于实验心理学的实验方法,只探索那些可能有“严格”定量答案的问题。其他人更喜欢以设计为导向的方法,这主要依赖于人类学的定性方法,如民族志。大多数与会者认为定量和定性方法的结合是必要的,挑战是如何以互补的方式使用这些方法。接下来,Wendy Kellogg和Tom Edckson讨论了在线社区用于商业的问题。他们首先带领团队唱了一首20世纪50年代的IBM“精神”歌,提醒我们,在商业和专业环境中,社区的概念并不是一个新概念:许多企业早就发现,通过调用“社区”来增加联系、团队合作和相互支持是很有用的。因此,虽然商业或专业同事的虚拟社区的想法可能相对较新,但推动这些想法的动力却不是。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信