{"title":"‘Shining temples of health’: pithead bath architecture in Britain 1921–1939","authors":"G. Boyd","doi":"10.1080/13602365.2022.2086153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawing extensively on previously unseen archival material, this paper examines the development and evolution of the Miners’ Welfare Committee pithead baths programme from its initiation until 1939. It argues that the function of aesthetics seen in the mature forms of these buildings in the 1930s emerged from a response to the particularly complex and controversial conditions that surrounded the mining industry. It explores how the forms realised — and praised by Anthony Bertram and Nikolaus Pevsner amongst others — were the endpoints of a long process, one which had involved the negotiation of legislative and economic landscapes, and the engagement of scientific and hygienic theories. This process also drew upon critiqued and adapted international precedents in both bathing and civic buildings before alighting upon an architectural language that was not only flexible enough to respond to the precise criteria of washing large numbers of miners but also, when combined with other media, could communicate the value of such facilities to what were often sceptical audiences within traditionally conservative mining communities. Attuned to this range of functions, the result was a highly conspicuous and significant generation of over six hundred buildings that were iterative and underpinned by common principles, yet capable of variation within their organisation, interior and exterior forms, and components. This paper also explores the significance of these buildings not only within these qualities but also in the modern aesthetics of light, space, and air they invoked. Furthermore, the paper reveals the effects of their existence outside the collieries on other less visible protagonists — the women of the coalfields and their families — whose domestic circumstances were simultaneously transformed.","PeriodicalId":44236,"journal":{"name":"METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture","volume":"14 1","pages":"176 - 203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2022.2086153","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Drawing extensively on previously unseen archival material, this paper examines the development and evolution of the Miners’ Welfare Committee pithead baths programme from its initiation until 1939. It argues that the function of aesthetics seen in the mature forms of these buildings in the 1930s emerged from a response to the particularly complex and controversial conditions that surrounded the mining industry. It explores how the forms realised — and praised by Anthony Bertram and Nikolaus Pevsner amongst others — were the endpoints of a long process, one which had involved the negotiation of legislative and economic landscapes, and the engagement of scientific and hygienic theories. This process also drew upon critiqued and adapted international precedents in both bathing and civic buildings before alighting upon an architectural language that was not only flexible enough to respond to the precise criteria of washing large numbers of miners but also, when combined with other media, could communicate the value of such facilities to what were often sceptical audiences within traditionally conservative mining communities. Attuned to this range of functions, the result was a highly conspicuous and significant generation of over six hundred buildings that were iterative and underpinned by common principles, yet capable of variation within their organisation, interior and exterior forms, and components. This paper also explores the significance of these buildings not only within these qualities but also in the modern aesthetics of light, space, and air they invoked. Furthermore, the paper reveals the effects of their existence outside the collieries on other less visible protagonists — the women of the coalfields and their families — whose domestic circumstances were simultaneously transformed.
期刊介绍:
METU JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE is a biannual refereed publication of the Middle East Technical University published every June and December, and offers a comprehensive range of articles contributing to the development of knowledge in man-environment relations, design and planning. METU JFA accepts submissions in English or Turkish, and assumes that the manuscripts received by the Journal have not been published previously or that are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Editorial Board claims no responsibility for the opinions expressed in the published manuscripts. METU JFA invites theory, research and history papers on the following fields and related interdisciplinary topics: architecture and urbanism, planning and design, restoration and preservation, buildings and building systems technologies and design, product design and technologies. Prospective manuscripts for publication in these fields may constitute; 1. Original theoretical papers; 2. Original research papers; 3. Documents and critical expositions; 4. Applied studies related to professional practice; 5. Educational works, commentaries and reviews; 6. Book reviews Manuscripts, in English or Turkish, have to be approved by the Editorial Board, which are then forwarded to Referees before acceptance for publication. The Board claims no responsibility for the opinions expressed in the published manuscripts. It is assumed that the manuscripts received by the Journal are not sent to other journals for publication purposes and have not been previously published elsewhere.