Comparison between analytical and numerical solution of mathematical drying model

Q3 Mathematics
N. Shahari, K. Rasmani, N. Jamil
{"title":"Comparison between analytical and numerical solution of mathematical drying model","authors":"N. Shahari, K. Rasmani, N. Jamil","doi":"10.1063/1.4940291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drying is often related to the food industry as a process of shifting heat and mass inside food, which helps in preserving food. Previous research using a mass transfer equation showed that the results were mostly concerned with the comparison between the simulation model and the experimental data. In this paper, the finite difference method was used to solve a mass equation during drying using different kinds of boundary condition, which are equilibrium and convective boundary conditions. The results of these two models provide a comparison between the analytical and the numerical solution. The result shows a close match between the two solution curves. It is concluded that the two proposed models produce an accurate solution to describe the moisture distribution content during the drying process. This analysis indicates that we have confidence in the behaviour of moisture in the numerical simulation. This result demonstrated that a combined analytical and numerical approach prove that the system is behaving physically. Based on this assumption, the model of mass transfer was extended to include the temperature transfer, and the result shows a similar trend to those presented in the simpler case.","PeriodicalId":52174,"journal":{"name":"Mathematics in Engineering, Science and Aerospace","volume":"35 1","pages":"020043"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematics in Engineering, Science and Aerospace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4940291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Drying is often related to the food industry as a process of shifting heat and mass inside food, which helps in preserving food. Previous research using a mass transfer equation showed that the results were mostly concerned with the comparison between the simulation model and the experimental data. In this paper, the finite difference method was used to solve a mass equation during drying using different kinds of boundary condition, which are equilibrium and convective boundary conditions. The results of these two models provide a comparison between the analytical and the numerical solution. The result shows a close match between the two solution curves. It is concluded that the two proposed models produce an accurate solution to describe the moisture distribution content during the drying process. This analysis indicates that we have confidence in the behaviour of moisture in the numerical simulation. This result demonstrated that a combined analytical and numerical approach prove that the system is behaving physically. Based on this assumption, the model of mass transfer was extended to include the temperature transfer, and the result shows a similar trend to those presented in the simpler case.
干燥数学模型解析解与数值解的比较
干燥通常与食品工业有关,它是一种在食物内部转移热量和质量的过程,有助于保存食物。以往使用传质方程的研究表明,结果主要是将模拟模型与实验数据进行比较。本文采用有限差分法求解了干燥过程中不同边界条件下的质量方程,即平衡边界条件和对流边界条件。这两个模型的结果提供了解析解和数值解的比较。结果表明,两种解曲线吻合较好。结果表明,两种模型均能较准确地描述干燥过程中的水分分布。这一分析表明,我们对数值模拟中的水分行为有信心。这一结果表明,结合分析和数值方法证明了系统的物理行为。基于这一假设,将传质模型扩展到包括温度传递在内,其结果与简单情况下的结果相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mathematics in Engineering, Science and Aerospace
Mathematics in Engineering, Science and Aerospace Mathematics-Applied Mathematics
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信