Bibliometric Analysis of the Three-Volume Labor “Development of the Concepts of Modern Psychology” (2018–2021)

IF 0.5 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
A. Zhuravlev
{"title":"Bibliometric Analysis of the Three-Volume Labor “Development of the Concepts of Modern Psychology” (2018–2021)","authors":"A. Zhuravlev","doi":"10.31857/s020595920024366-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents a bibliometric analysis of the concepts analyzed by scientists from the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences and disclosed in three volumes of the work “Development of modern concepts of psychology” (2018, 2019 and 2021). The generalization carried out for all the presented concepts made it possible to put forward a hypothesis about the existence of metaconcepts — the subject and the collective subject, which pull together the network organization of conceptual fields, setting the architecture of their system-network organization. The conducted bibliometric analysis of the concepts of three volumes showed that the mapping of concepts makes it possible to identify clusters of network organization, among which there are two, which can be conditionally designated as “individual subject” and “collective subject”. Only the morpheme “psychologist-”, outstripping all the others in frequency of occurrence. These results may support the hypothesis of the existence of “meta-concepts” and their role in the system-network organization. Comparative analysis of the concept map based on the author's keywords of publications indexed in Scopus for five years, “contraction” of terms into complexes that can be designated as individual and collective subjects could not be found, while the analysis of articles in the same database by the same authors discovered two centers in 20 years. The individual and collective subject become central concepts, with multiple connections. The question of hierarchical conceptual organization remains open due to the limited possibilities of bibliometric analysis, which does not allow revealing such relationships between concepts. Bibliometric analysis made it possible to show the network organization of modern concepts, the existence of thematic conceptual fields and leave open the question of their system-network organization.","PeriodicalId":51778,"journal":{"name":"Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s020595920024366-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents a bibliometric analysis of the concepts analyzed by scientists from the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences and disclosed in three volumes of the work “Development of modern concepts of psychology” (2018, 2019 and 2021). The generalization carried out for all the presented concepts made it possible to put forward a hypothesis about the existence of metaconcepts — the subject and the collective subject, which pull together the network organization of conceptual fields, setting the architecture of their system-network organization. The conducted bibliometric analysis of the concepts of three volumes showed that the mapping of concepts makes it possible to identify clusters of network organization, among which there are two, which can be conditionally designated as “individual subject” and “collective subject”. Only the morpheme “psychologist-”, outstripping all the others in frequency of occurrence. These results may support the hypothesis of the existence of “meta-concepts” and their role in the system-network organization. Comparative analysis of the concept map based on the author's keywords of publications indexed in Scopus for five years, “contraction” of terms into complexes that can be designated as individual and collective subjects could not be found, while the analysis of articles in the same database by the same authors discovered two centers in 20 years. The individual and collective subject become central concepts, with multiple connections. The question of hierarchical conceptual organization remains open due to the limited possibilities of bibliometric analysis, which does not allow revealing such relationships between concepts. Bibliometric analysis made it possible to show the network organization of modern concepts, the existence of thematic conceptual fields and leave open the question of their system-network organization.
《现代心理学概念发展》三卷本文献计量学分析(2018-2021)
本文对俄罗斯科学院心理研究所的科学家在《现代心理学概念的发展》(2018年、2019年和2021年)三卷中所披露的概念进行了文献计量分析。对所提出的概念进行概化,使我们有可能提出元概念——主体和集体主体存在的假设,它们将概念场的网络组织联系在一起,并设置了它们的系统-网络组织架构。对三卷的概念进行文献计量分析表明,概念的映射使网络组织集群得以识别,其中有两个集群,可以有条件地指定为“个体主体”和“集体主体”。只有“心理学家”这一语素的出现频率高于其他语素。这些结果可能支持“元概念”的存在及其在系统-网络组织中的作用的假设。对Scopus收录的5年的论文进行以作者关键词为基础的概念图的对比分析,没有发现将术语“收缩”成可以指定为个体和集体主题的综合体,而对同一作者在同一数据库中的文章进行分析,却发现20年里出现了两个中心。个体和集体主体成为中心概念,具有多重联系。由于文献计量分析的可能性有限,分层概念组织的问题仍然是开放的,它不允许揭示概念之间的这种关系。文献计量学分析可以显示现代概念的网络组织,主题概念领域的存在,并为它们的系统-网络组织问题留下开放性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal
Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
60.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Psikhologicheskii zhurnal is a publication of the Russian Academy of Sciences and the RAS Institute of Psychology. This determines its contents, academical style, and the form of papers published in it. The journal publishes the papers on the fundamental problems of psychology, its methodological, theoretical, and experimental foundations, and also the results of the investigations connected with the applied problems of social and scientific life. The discussions published on the page of the journal contribute to the revelation of general tendencies in the development of psychology and its approximation to practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信