Postoperative Opioid Use and Pain Management Following Otologic and Neurotologic Surgery

Christopher Boyd, M. Shew, Joseph Penn, Thomas J Muelleman, James Lin, H. Staecker, Helena Wichova
{"title":"Postoperative Opioid Use and Pain Management Following Otologic and Neurotologic Surgery","authors":"Christopher Boyd, M. Shew, Joseph Penn, Thomas J Muelleman, James Lin, H. Staecker, Helena Wichova","doi":"10.1177/0003489419883296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The topic of prescription opioid overuse remains a growing concern in the United States. Our objective is to provide insight into pain perception and opioid use based on a patient cohort undergoing common otologic and neurotologic surgeries. Study Design: Prospective observational study with patient questionnaire. Setting: Single academic medical center. Subjects and Methods: Adult patients undergoing otologic and neurotologic procedures by two fellowship trained neurotologists between June and November of 2018 were included in this study. During first postoperative follow-up, participants completed a questionnaire assessing perceived postoperative pain and its impact on quality of life, pain management techniques, and extent of prescription opioid use. Results: A total of 47 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria. The median pain score was 3 out of 10 (Interquartile Range [IQR] = 2-6) with no significant gender differences (P = .92). Patients were prescribed a median of 15.0 (IQR = 10.0-15.0) tablets of opioid pain medication postoperatively, but only used a median of 4.0 (IQR = 1.0-11.5) tablets at the time of first follow-up. Measured quality of life areas included sleep, physical activity, work, and mood. Sleep was most commonly affected, with 69.4% of patients noting disturbances. Conclusions: This study suggests that practitioners may over-estimate the need for opioid pain medication following otologic and neurotologic surgery. It also demonstrates the need for ongoing patient education regarding opioid risks, alternatives, and measures to prevent diversion.","PeriodicalId":8361,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology","volume":"14 1","pages":"175 - 180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489419883296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Objectives: The topic of prescription opioid overuse remains a growing concern in the United States. Our objective is to provide insight into pain perception and opioid use based on a patient cohort undergoing common otologic and neurotologic surgeries. Study Design: Prospective observational study with patient questionnaire. Setting: Single academic medical center. Subjects and Methods: Adult patients undergoing otologic and neurotologic procedures by two fellowship trained neurotologists between June and November of 2018 were included in this study. During first postoperative follow-up, participants completed a questionnaire assessing perceived postoperative pain and its impact on quality of life, pain management techniques, and extent of prescription opioid use. Results: A total of 47 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria. The median pain score was 3 out of 10 (Interquartile Range [IQR] = 2-6) with no significant gender differences (P = .92). Patients were prescribed a median of 15.0 (IQR = 10.0-15.0) tablets of opioid pain medication postoperatively, but only used a median of 4.0 (IQR = 1.0-11.5) tablets at the time of first follow-up. Measured quality of life areas included sleep, physical activity, work, and mood. Sleep was most commonly affected, with 69.4% of patients noting disturbances. Conclusions: This study suggests that practitioners may over-estimate the need for opioid pain medication following otologic and neurotologic surgery. It also demonstrates the need for ongoing patient education regarding opioid risks, alternatives, and measures to prevent diversion.
耳科和神经外科术后阿片类药物的使用和疼痛管理
目的:处方阿片类药物过度使用的话题在美国仍然是一个日益关注的问题。我们的目标是提供洞察疼痛感知和阿片类药物的使用基于患者队列接受普通耳科和神经外科手术。研究设计:采用患者问卷的前瞻性观察性研究。环境:单一的学术医疗中心。对象和方法:2018年6月至11月期间由两名接受过奖学金培训的神经内科医生接受耳科和神经内科手术的成年患者纳入本研究。在第一次术后随访中,参与者完成了一份问卷,评估术后疼痛及其对生活质量、疼痛管理技术和处方阿片类药物使用程度的影响。结果:47例患者符合纳入和排除标准。中位疼痛评分为3分(总分10分)(四分位间距[IQR] = 2-6),性别差异无统计学意义(P = 0.92)。患者术后处方阿片类止痛药的中位数为15.0片(IQR = 10.0-15.0),但在首次随访时仅使用中位数为4.0片(IQR = 1.0-11.5)。测量的生活质量领域包括睡眠、身体活动、工作和情绪。睡眠最常受到影响,69.4%的患者有睡眠障碍。结论:本研究提示从业者可能高估了耳科和神经外科手术后阿片类止痛药的需求。它还表明需要对患者进行关于阿片类药物风险、替代方案和预防转移措施的持续教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信