Effect of Mode of Continuity of Tension Reinforcement Bars on Flexural Strength of R.C. Beam

K. B. Osifala, O. Omokungbe, M. Salau
{"title":"Effect of Mode of Continuity of Tension Reinforcement Bars on Flexural Strength of R.C. Beam","authors":"K. B. Osifala, O. Omokungbe, M. Salau","doi":"10.2478/cons-2017-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The research investigation was carried out to determine the effect of different modes of continuity of tension reinforcement bars on the flexural strength of reinforced concrete beams. Nine (9) full size beams (2150 mm × 250 mm × 180 mm) were cast with 2 numbers of 16 mm diameter high yield bars in tension and 10 mm diameter high yield stirrups at 100 mm centres at the shear spans. Three (3) beams each were cast with full length bars (reference), lap-spliced bars and butt-welded reinforcement bars in tension. Twenty-seven (27) 150 mm cubes were also cast to monitor concrete strength. The beams and cubes were cured for twenty-eight (28) days and tested in flexure under four points bending system and in compression respectively. The test results showed that full length bars, lap-spliced and butt-welded bars had an average moment capacity of 25.54 kN·m, 19.16 kN·m and 10.64 kN·m respectively. Lap-spliced beam gave a higher moment of resistance compared to the beams with butt welded steel reinforcing bars. The average midspan deflection of butt welded reinforcement was smaller than that of in the beam with lap spliced type of continuity. It was concluded that continuity using lap spliced bars in tension is more effective and efficient than butt welded continuity. 58.34 %, 25.00 % of the moment capacity of beams with full length reinforcement was lost by using butt weld, without a coupler, and lap spliced bars, respectively.","PeriodicalId":22024,"journal":{"name":"Stroitel stvo nauka i obrazovanie [Construction Science and Education]","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroitel stvo nauka i obrazovanie [Construction Science and Education]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/cons-2017-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The research investigation was carried out to determine the effect of different modes of continuity of tension reinforcement bars on the flexural strength of reinforced concrete beams. Nine (9) full size beams (2150 mm × 250 mm × 180 mm) were cast with 2 numbers of 16 mm diameter high yield bars in tension and 10 mm diameter high yield stirrups at 100 mm centres at the shear spans. Three (3) beams each were cast with full length bars (reference), lap-spliced bars and butt-welded reinforcement bars in tension. Twenty-seven (27) 150 mm cubes were also cast to monitor concrete strength. The beams and cubes were cured for twenty-eight (28) days and tested in flexure under four points bending system and in compression respectively. The test results showed that full length bars, lap-spliced and butt-welded bars had an average moment capacity of 25.54 kN·m, 19.16 kN·m and 10.64 kN·m respectively. Lap-spliced beam gave a higher moment of resistance compared to the beams with butt welded steel reinforcing bars. The average midspan deflection of butt welded reinforcement was smaller than that of in the beam with lap spliced type of continuity. It was concluded that continuity using lap spliced bars in tension is more effective and efficient than butt welded continuity. 58.34 %, 25.00 % of the moment capacity of beams with full length reinforcement was lost by using butt weld, without a coupler, and lap spliced bars, respectively.
受拉钢筋连续方式对钢筋混凝土梁抗弯强度的影响
摘要为确定不同受拉钢筋连续方式对钢筋混凝土梁抗弯强度的影响,进行了研究调查。九(9)根全尺寸梁(2150 mm × 250 mm × 180 mm)浇铸了2根直径16 mm的高屈服筋和直径10 mm的高屈服马镫,位于剪跨中心100 mm处。三(3)根梁分别浇铸了全长钢筋(参考)、搭接钢筋和对焊钢筋。还浇铸了27(27)个150mm的立方体来监测混凝土强度。梁和立方体分别固化二十八(28)天,并分别在四点弯曲系统和压缩下进行弯曲试验。试验结果表明,全长筋、搭接筋和对焊筋的平均弯矩承载力分别为25.54 kN·m、19.16 kN·m和10.64 kN·m。搭接梁比搭接钢筋梁具有更高的抗弯矩。对焊钢筋的平均跨中挠度小于搭接连续梁的平均跨中挠度。结果表明,搭接钢筋的拉伸连续比对接焊接的拉伸连续更有效。采用对焊、不加耦合器和搭接钢筋分别使带全长配筋梁的弯矩承载力损失58.34%、25.00%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信