Which Country Has the World's Best Healthcare?

P. Mattei, Theodor Marmor
{"title":"Which Country Has the World's Best Healthcare?","authors":"P. Mattei, Theodor Marmor","doi":"10.1080/13876988.2023.2198983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"tools fit the purpose of and facilitate their actions (tools for negotiations, evaluation, inducing a change in a target group, etc.). Applying the cycle approach results in tools with the same purpose popping up across the volume’s chapters. An obvious example is tools to evaluate interventions – they can be used ex ante, mid-term, or ex post (e.g. quasi/experiments, Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) – usually used ex ante rather than ex post in the policy cycle). I understand the nature of the simplification used in the handbook that was required to organize the complexity of the tools. However, readers should treat this grouping as an initial map, not as clear-cut toolbox compartments with unique tools assigned to the cycle. Summing up, The Routledge Handbook of Policy Tools is truly a one-stop shop to learn about past trends and recent emerging topics in the research and practice of policy tools. It would be a valuable companion for researchers and students of public policies, as well as useful reading for decision-makers and other stakeholders involved in public policy. Policy sciences is a practice-oriented discipline. Thus, this volume can potentially facilitate collaboration and shared understanding between research and practice. It can serve as a reference point in discussing tools’ options for collective problem-solving in the era of the Anthropocene.","PeriodicalId":15486,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice","volume":"87 1","pages":"362 - 364"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2023.2198983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

tools fit the purpose of and facilitate their actions (tools for negotiations, evaluation, inducing a change in a target group, etc.). Applying the cycle approach results in tools with the same purpose popping up across the volume’s chapters. An obvious example is tools to evaluate interventions – they can be used ex ante, mid-term, or ex post (e.g. quasi/experiments, Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) – usually used ex ante rather than ex post in the policy cycle). I understand the nature of the simplification used in the handbook that was required to organize the complexity of the tools. However, readers should treat this grouping as an initial map, not as clear-cut toolbox compartments with unique tools assigned to the cycle. Summing up, The Routledge Handbook of Policy Tools is truly a one-stop shop to learn about past trends and recent emerging topics in the research and practice of policy tools. It would be a valuable companion for researchers and students of public policies, as well as useful reading for decision-makers and other stakeholders involved in public policy. Policy sciences is a practice-oriented discipline. Thus, this volume can potentially facilitate collaboration and shared understanding between research and practice. It can serve as a reference point in discussing tools’ options for collective problem-solving in the era of the Anthropocene.
哪个国家拥有世界上最好的医疗保健?
工具适合他们的目的并促进他们的行动(用于谈判、评估、在目标群体中引起变化等的工具)。应用循环方法会导致具有相同目的的工具在卷的各个章节中弹出。一个明显的例子是评估干预措施的工具——它们可以在事前、中期或事后使用(例如准/实验、监管影响评估(RIA)——通常在政策周期中事前而不是事后使用)。我理解手册中使用的简化的本质,这需要组织工具的复杂性。然而,读者应该把这个分组当作一个初始的地图,而不是作为一个明确的工具箱,为周期分配了独特的工具。总而言之,《劳特利奇政策工具手册》是一本了解政策工具研究和实践中过去的趋势和最近出现的主题的一站式商店。它将是公共政策研究人员和学生的宝贵伴侣,也是决策者和参与公共政策的其他利益相关者的有用读物。政策科学是一门实践性很强的学科。因此,这本书可以潜在地促进研究和实践之间的合作和共享理解。它可以作为讨论人类世时代集体解决问题的工具选择的参考点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信