Determinants of Non-Performing Loans for the EEC Region. A Financial Stability Perspective

IF 1.9 Q3 BUSINESS
Luminița Tătărici, M. Kubinschi, Dinu Barnea
{"title":"Determinants of Non-Performing Loans for the EEC Region. A Financial Stability Perspective","authors":"Luminița Tătărici, M. Kubinschi, Dinu Barnea","doi":"10.2478/mmcks-2020-0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article investigates the determinants of non-performing loans for a panel of EEC countries and the implications for the real economy, covering the period 2005-2017. Among the determinants, the paper proposes macroeconomic factors, banking sector variables, and cost and governance indicators. Additionally, the paper explores the extensive use of macroprudential measures in these countries. Using a panel with fixed effects and a dynamic GMM estimator, the results support the existing findings that adverse macroeconomic developments are generally associated with higher non-performing loans, while increases in NPLs have a rather transitory effect on the real economy and credit. NPL ratios increase if macroeconomic conditions deteriorate, while an improvement in the government effectiveness reduces them. A more profitable and better capitalized banking sector generally leads to lower NPLs. Moreover, countries with higher past credit growth rates witnessed higher NPLs in the periods that followed. These results support the use of macroprudential measures for increasing the resilience of borrowers, such as limits on the indebtedness level (such as debt service-to-income, DSTI or loan-to-value, LTV caps), as tools to temper the credit cycle.","PeriodicalId":44909,"journal":{"name":"Management & Marketing-Challenges for the Knowledge Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management & Marketing-Challenges for the Knowledge Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2020-0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract This article investigates the determinants of non-performing loans for a panel of EEC countries and the implications for the real economy, covering the period 2005-2017. Among the determinants, the paper proposes macroeconomic factors, banking sector variables, and cost and governance indicators. Additionally, the paper explores the extensive use of macroprudential measures in these countries. Using a panel with fixed effects and a dynamic GMM estimator, the results support the existing findings that adverse macroeconomic developments are generally associated with higher non-performing loans, while increases in NPLs have a rather transitory effect on the real economy and credit. NPL ratios increase if macroeconomic conditions deteriorate, while an improvement in the government effectiveness reduces them. A more profitable and better capitalized banking sector generally leads to lower NPLs. Moreover, countries with higher past credit growth rates witnessed higher NPLs in the periods that followed. These results support the use of macroprudential measures for increasing the resilience of borrowers, such as limits on the indebtedness level (such as debt service-to-income, DSTI or loan-to-value, LTV caps), as tools to temper the credit cycle.
欧洲经济共同体地区不良贷款的决定因素。金融稳定的视角
摘要本文以欧共体国家为样本,研究了2005-2017年期间不良贷款的决定因素及其对实体经济的影响。在决定因素中,本文提出了宏观经济因素、银行业变量以及成本和治理指标。此外,本文探讨了宏观审慎措施在这些国家的广泛使用。使用固定效应面板和动态GMM估计器,结果支持现有的研究结果,即不利的宏观经济发展通常与较高的不良贷款有关,而不良贷款的增加对实体经济和信贷的影响相当短暂。如果宏观经济状况恶化,不良贷款率就会上升,而政府效率的提高则会降低不良贷款率。盈利能力更强、资本状况更好的银行业通常会导致不良贷款下降。此外,过去信贷增长率较高的国家在随后的时期出现了更高的不良贷款。这些结果支持使用宏观审慎措施来提高借款人的抗风险能力,例如限制负债水平(如偿债与收入之比、DSTI或贷款与价值之比、LTV上限),作为缓和信贷周期的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
25
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信