HUMAN AS A CARRIER OF THE WORLDVIEW: INDIVIDUAL AND COLLECTIVE DIMENSIONS

IF 0.5 0 PHILOSOPHY
V. Havrylenko
{"title":"HUMAN AS A CARRIER OF THE WORLDVIEW: INDIVIDUAL AND COLLECTIVE DIMENSIONS","authors":"V. Havrylenko","doi":"10.15802/ampr.v0i18.210988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. The purpose of the study is to outline the links between individual and collective dimensions of the human worldview. This purpose requires solving two tasks: to update philosophical ideas formed by reflection on human and community worldview; to identify and generalize the relationship of singular and general in the context of the problem of human worldview. Theoretical basis. The study is based on philosophical reflections about manifestations of singular and general worldviews. Such reflections appeared in European philosophy quite a long time ago (Dilthey, Rickert, Jaspers). Ukrainian and foreign philosophical discourse considers both measures of the worldview. And a role of the carrier of worldview plays either human or society. We can see that in researches of S. Krymskyi, I. V. Popov, N. V. Tabachkovskyi, V. Shynkaruk, V. Poythress, D. Rousseau, D. Billingham, C. Gianolla and others. However the links between individual and collective dimensions of worldview are not clearly outlined. It is possible to note the research of V. Popov who focuses on the problem of socio-collective and individual dimensions of worldview. But the scientist focuses more on the use of the concept of worldview in these two meanings. Human as a social being interacts with worldviews of other individuals. That is why we can speak of two dimensions of the worldview function: individual and collective. This problem became topical due to acuteness of the links between human and society in modern life. Originality. The author outlined key links between individual and collective dimensions of human worldview functioning. The study identified a role of human as a carrier of the worldview in formation of collective worldview. Conclusions. Human as a worldview carrier plays a key role in formation of collective worldview. In philosophical discourse thoughts about links between individual and collective worldviews are different and sometimes conflicting. We have a discussion problem of uniformity and diversity of collective worldview. Collective worldview is showed as a circulation of different ideas and views of individuals. But collective worldview is showed as a whole system of individual views too. Collective worldview manifests as integrated phenomenon because it is based on common worldviews of individuals. At the same time the human is influenced by collective worldview in particularly as a past generation heritage. как либо общих мировоззрений. Коллективное Ведь оно базируется В то же и подвергается прошлых поколений. Ключевые слова: человек; индивидуальное мировоззрение; коллективное мировоззрение; мировосприя-тие; мироощущение; миропонимание","PeriodicalId":42650,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i18.210988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the study is to outline the links between individual and collective dimensions of the human worldview. This purpose requires solving two tasks: to update philosophical ideas formed by reflection on human and community worldview; to identify and generalize the relationship of singular and general in the context of the problem of human worldview. Theoretical basis. The study is based on philosophical reflections about manifestations of singular and general worldviews. Such reflections appeared in European philosophy quite a long time ago (Dilthey, Rickert, Jaspers). Ukrainian and foreign philosophical discourse considers both measures of the worldview. And a role of the carrier of worldview plays either human or society. We can see that in researches of S. Krymskyi, I. V. Popov, N. V. Tabachkovskyi, V. Shynkaruk, V. Poythress, D. Rousseau, D. Billingham, C. Gianolla and others. However the links between individual and collective dimensions of worldview are not clearly outlined. It is possible to note the research of V. Popov who focuses on the problem of socio-collective and individual dimensions of worldview. But the scientist focuses more on the use of the concept of worldview in these two meanings. Human as a social being interacts with worldviews of other individuals. That is why we can speak of two dimensions of the worldview function: individual and collective. This problem became topical due to acuteness of the links between human and society in modern life. Originality. The author outlined key links between individual and collective dimensions of human worldview functioning. The study identified a role of human as a carrier of the worldview in formation of collective worldview. Conclusions. Human as a worldview carrier plays a key role in formation of collective worldview. In philosophical discourse thoughts about links between individual and collective worldviews are different and sometimes conflicting. We have a discussion problem of uniformity and diversity of collective worldview. Collective worldview is showed as a circulation of different ideas and views of individuals. But collective worldview is showed as a whole system of individual views too. Collective worldview manifests as integrated phenomenon because it is based on common worldviews of individuals. At the same time the human is influenced by collective worldview in particularly as a past generation heritage. как либо общих мировоззрений. Коллективное Ведь оно базируется В то же и подвергается прошлых поколений. Ключевые слова: человек; индивидуальное мировоззрение; коллективное мировоззрение; мировосприя-тие; мироощущение; миропонимание
人作为世界观的载体:个体与集体的维度
目的。这项研究的目的是概述人类世界观的个人和集体维度之间的联系。这一目的需要解决两项任务:更新反思人类和社会世界观所形成的哲学观念;在人类世界观问题的背景下,识别和概括单一与一般的关系。理论基础。该研究基于对单一世界观和一般世界观表现形式的哲学反思。这样的反思在很久以前就出现在欧洲哲学中(狄尔泰,里克特,雅斯贝尔斯)。乌克兰和外国哲学话语考虑了世界观的两种衡量标准。世界观的载体要么是人,要么是社会。我们可以从S. Krymskyi、I. V. Popov、N. V. Tabachkovskyi、V. Shynkaruk、V. Poythress、D. Rousseau、D. Billingham、C. Gianolla等人的研究中看到这一点。然而,世界观的个人层面和集体层面之间的联系并没有得到明确的概述。值得注意的是,波波夫的研究侧重于世界观的社会集体和个人维度的问题。但科学家更关注的是世界观概念在这两种意义上的运用。人类作为一种社会存在,与其他个体的世界观相互作用。这就是为什么我们可以谈论世界观功能的两个维度:个人和集体。由于人与社会在现代生活中的紧密联系,这一问题成为热门话题。创意。作者概述了人类世界观功能的个人和集体维度之间的关键联系。在集体世界观的形成过程中,人是世界观的载体。结论。人作为世界观的载体,在集体世界观的形成中起着关键作用。在哲学话语中,关于个人世界观和集体世界观之间联系的思考是不同的,有时是相互冲突的。我们讨论了集体世界观的统一性和多样性问题。集体世界观表现为个人不同思想和观点的循环。但是,集体世界观也表现为个人观点的整体体系。集体世界观以个体的共同世界观为基础,表现为一种综合现象。与此同时,人类受到集体世界观的影响,特别是作为过去一代的遗产。как либо общих мировоззрений。КоллективноеВедьонобазируетсяВтожеиподвергаетсяпрошлыхпоколений。Ключевые слова: человек;индивидуальноемировоззрение;коллективноемировоззрение;мировосприя——тие;мироощущение;миропонимание
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
66.70%
发文量
13
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信