Evaluating Liquid Loading Using Multiphase Dynamic Flow Simulation in Complex Openhole Multilateral Gas Condensate Wells

H. Saradva, Siddharth Jain, M. Hamadi, K. Thakur, G. Govindan, A. F. Ahmed
{"title":"Evaluating Liquid Loading Using Multiphase Dynamic Flow Simulation in Complex Openhole Multilateral Gas Condensate Wells","authors":"H. Saradva, Siddharth Jain, M. Hamadi, K. Thakur, G. Govindan, A. F. Ahmed","doi":"10.2118/194868-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents a case study from Onshore wells in Sharjah, UAE on investigating liquid loading in 5 multilateral gas wells having various trajectories ranging from toe-up, toe-down and hybrid openhole legs. These wells are subjected to wellhead pressure reduction to maximize production rates. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the production performance for different completion designs with respect to liquid loading onset and overall production assessment with declining reservoir pressure.\n Dynamic multiphase flow simulator was used to conduct this study to accurately capture the details of the multilaterals system and its complex trajectories. The first step involved validating the well model with reasonable history match between the simulation and actual production data. The validated model then was used as a basis for predicting the liquid loading onset point for a given reservoir pressure decline. Multiple cases were investigated to evaluate various completion options (i.e. with or without tubing) to determine how and when the liquid loading occurs at different laterals with varying lateral trajectory.\n This study has showed that in such complex multi-lateral wells, laterals load up at different points in time and reservoir pressures, being affected mainly by the geometry and orientation of lateral and the production contribution. Moreover, installing tubing in these wells had the opposite anticipated effect on liquid loading by accelerating the liquid loading onset in the laterals due to the imposed additional restriction. Generally, toe-down trajectory tends to have thicker liquid film and a potential for reduced flow contribution due to liquid accumulation at the toe.\n These wells have a fishbone openhole multilateral network with comingled flow in the vertical section. It is observed that production tubing in the vertical section provides friction that accelerates the onset of liquid loading and hence results in decreased production for wells operating in very low reservoir pressure range. Based on overall production assessment ‘no tubing’ scenario would be more beneficial. Further, the timing of implementation of the tubing restriction later in the field life can be selected based on dynamic simulations (also evaluating economic constraints vs production gain).\n Transient mechanistic flow model captures the liquid loading phenomena by film reversal which usually occurs before the critical rate limit based on droplet drag forces assessment. Further, liquid loading onset occurs in the laterals first rather than the tubing section which reduces the applicability of conventional nodal analysis tools. Evaluating liquid loading behaviour in such multilateral wells with proper dynamic simulation is critical for understanding the laterals behaviour and therefore optimizing the production performance to maximize the wells uptime and ultimately the overall gas recovery as well as optimal usage of CAPEX.","PeriodicalId":11031,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, March 21, 2019","volume":"105 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, March 21, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/194868-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper presents a case study from Onshore wells in Sharjah, UAE on investigating liquid loading in 5 multilateral gas wells having various trajectories ranging from toe-up, toe-down and hybrid openhole legs. These wells are subjected to wellhead pressure reduction to maximize production rates. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the production performance for different completion designs with respect to liquid loading onset and overall production assessment with declining reservoir pressure. Dynamic multiphase flow simulator was used to conduct this study to accurately capture the details of the multilaterals system and its complex trajectories. The first step involved validating the well model with reasonable history match between the simulation and actual production data. The validated model then was used as a basis for predicting the liquid loading onset point for a given reservoir pressure decline. Multiple cases were investigated to evaluate various completion options (i.e. with or without tubing) to determine how and when the liquid loading occurs at different laterals with varying lateral trajectory. This study has showed that in such complex multi-lateral wells, laterals load up at different points in time and reservoir pressures, being affected mainly by the geometry and orientation of lateral and the production contribution. Moreover, installing tubing in these wells had the opposite anticipated effect on liquid loading by accelerating the liquid loading onset in the laterals due to the imposed additional restriction. Generally, toe-down trajectory tends to have thicker liquid film and a potential for reduced flow contribution due to liquid accumulation at the toe. These wells have a fishbone openhole multilateral network with comingled flow in the vertical section. It is observed that production tubing in the vertical section provides friction that accelerates the onset of liquid loading and hence results in decreased production for wells operating in very low reservoir pressure range. Based on overall production assessment ‘no tubing’ scenario would be more beneficial. Further, the timing of implementation of the tubing restriction later in the field life can be selected based on dynamic simulations (also evaluating economic constraints vs production gain). Transient mechanistic flow model captures the liquid loading phenomena by film reversal which usually occurs before the critical rate limit based on droplet drag forces assessment. Further, liquid loading onset occurs in the laterals first rather than the tubing section which reduces the applicability of conventional nodal analysis tools. Evaluating liquid loading behaviour in such multilateral wells with proper dynamic simulation is critical for understanding the laterals behaviour and therefore optimizing the production performance to maximize the wells uptime and ultimately the overall gas recovery as well as optimal usage of CAPEX.
基于多相动态流动模拟的复杂多分支凝析气井液载评价
本文介绍了阿联酋沙迦陆上井的案例研究,研究了5口多口气井的液体载荷,这些井有不同的轨迹,包括上、下和混合裸眼腿。为了最大限度地提高产量,这些井需要降低井口压力。该研究的主要目的是评估不同完井设计在油藏压力下降情况下的生产表现,包括液体加载开始和总体产量评估。采用动态多相流模拟器进行研究,以准确捕捉多相流系统及其复杂轨迹的细节。第一步是验证井模型,在模拟和实际生产数据之间建立合理的历史匹配。然后将验证的模型作为预测给定油藏压力下降时液体加载开始点的基础。研究了多个案例,以评估各种完井方案(即带油管或不带油管),以确定不同水平段、不同水平段轨迹的液体加载方式和时间。研究表明,在这种复杂的多分支井中,分支井在不同的时间点和油藏压力上加载,主要受分支井的几何形状和方向以及产量贡献的影响。此外,由于施加了额外的限制,在这些井中安装油管对液体加载产生了相反的效果,加速了水平段液体加载的开始。通常,脚趾向下的轨迹往往具有较厚的液膜,并且由于脚趾处的液体积聚,可能会减少流量贡献。这些井具有鱼骨状的裸眼多边网络,垂直段有混合流动。可以观察到,垂直段的生产油管会产生摩擦,加速液体加载的开始,从而导致在非常低的油藏压力范围内作业的油井产量下降。根据整体生产评估,“不使用油管”的方案更为有利。此外,可以根据动态模拟来选择油田后期实施油管限制的时间(也可以评估经济约束与生产收益)。瞬态力学流动模型基于液滴阻力评估,利用通常发生在临界速率极限之前的膜反转来捕捉液体加载现象。此外,液体载荷首先发生在分支段,而不是油管段,这降低了传统节点分析工具的适用性。通过适当的动态模拟来评估这些分支井的液体载荷行为,对于了解分支井的行为至关重要,从而优化生产性能,最大限度地延长井的正常运行时间,最终实现整体气采和资本支出的最佳利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信