MICROBIOLOGICAL QUALITY OFFRIED CHICKEN BREAST STRIPS MANUFACTURED WITH MONOSODIUM GLUTAMATE SUBSTITUTES

Islam Diaaeldin, Gehan A. El-Shourbagy, H. Hassan, Eman Abou Sayed-Ahmed
{"title":"MICROBIOLOGICAL QUALITY OFFRIED CHICKEN BREAST STRIPS MANUFACTURED WITH MONOSODIUM GLUTAMATE SUBSTITUTES","authors":"Islam Diaaeldin, Gehan A. El-Shourbagy, H. Hassan, Eman Abou Sayed-Ahmed","doi":"10.21608/zjar.2022.259294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The impact of replacement monosodium glutamate (MSG) with a ratio of 1:1 mixture of salt and sugar on the microbiological quality of deep fat fried chicken breast strips throughout frozen storage (-18°C) for 90 days was assessed. Also, the antibacterial activity of monosodium glutamate and a mixture of salt (sodium chloride) and sugar can (sucrose) in a ratio of 1:1 was determined by disc diffusion assay, the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Results showed that Gram-negative bacteria since the mean values of the inhibition zones were in the ranges of 11.8, 13.4, 15.4, and 16 mm when studying the effect of monosodium glutamate on Escherichia coli , Serratia marcescens , Bacillus cereus, and Staphylococcus aureus , respectively. Also, the mean values of the inhibition zones were in the ranges of 14.2, 15.6, 18.2, and 17 mm when studying the effect of the mix of sugar and salt in a ratio of 1:1 on Escherichia coli , Bacillus cereus, Serratia marcescens , and Staphylococcus aureus , respectively. The average MIC and MBC values of monosodium glutamate against Gram-negative bacteria were 37.5 and 75 µg/ml, respectively, while these values were 32.5 and 65 µg/ml against Gram-positive bacteria, respectively. Also, the average MIC and MBC values of the mix of sugar and salt in a ratio of 1:1 against Gram-negative bacteria were 27.2 and 55 µg/ml, respectively. While these values were 22.5 and 45 µg/ml, respectively against Gram-positive bacteria, respectively. Besides, the results demonstrated that the control of chicken strips possessed the uppermost values of total bacterial count and the least values of total coliform count compared to the remaining treatments. Salmonella and Escherichia coli were not found in both treatments up until the ending of the storage period. The control of chicken strips possessed the least counts of total Staphylococcus aureus , total psychrophilic bacteria, and yeast and mold counts compared to the remaining treatments.","PeriodicalId":23865,"journal":{"name":"Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/zjar.2022.259294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: The impact of replacement monosodium glutamate (MSG) with a ratio of 1:1 mixture of salt and sugar on the microbiological quality of deep fat fried chicken breast strips throughout frozen storage (-18°C) for 90 days was assessed. Also, the antibacterial activity of monosodium glutamate and a mixture of salt (sodium chloride) and sugar can (sucrose) in a ratio of 1:1 was determined by disc diffusion assay, the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Results showed that Gram-negative bacteria since the mean values of the inhibition zones were in the ranges of 11.8, 13.4, 15.4, and 16 mm when studying the effect of monosodium glutamate on Escherichia coli , Serratia marcescens , Bacillus cereus, and Staphylococcus aureus , respectively. Also, the mean values of the inhibition zones were in the ranges of 14.2, 15.6, 18.2, and 17 mm when studying the effect of the mix of sugar and salt in a ratio of 1:1 on Escherichia coli , Bacillus cereus, Serratia marcescens , and Staphylococcus aureus , respectively. The average MIC and MBC values of monosodium glutamate against Gram-negative bacteria were 37.5 and 75 µg/ml, respectively, while these values were 32.5 and 65 µg/ml against Gram-positive bacteria, respectively. Also, the average MIC and MBC values of the mix of sugar and salt in a ratio of 1:1 against Gram-negative bacteria were 27.2 and 55 µg/ml, respectively. While these values were 22.5 and 45 µg/ml, respectively against Gram-positive bacteria, respectively. Besides, the results demonstrated that the control of chicken strips possessed the uppermost values of total bacterial count and the least values of total coliform count compared to the remaining treatments. Salmonella and Escherichia coli were not found in both treatments up until the ending of the storage period. The control of chicken strips possessed the least counts of total Staphylococcus aureus , total psychrophilic bacteria, and yeast and mold counts compared to the remaining treatments.
用味精代用品制造的具有微生物品质的炸鸡胸肉条
研究了盐糖混合比例为1:1的谷氨酸钠(MSG)对深油炸鸡胸肉条冷冻(-18°C) 90天微生物品质的影响。采用圆盘扩散法测定味精与盐(氯化钠)与糖罐(蔗糖)按1:1的比例配制的混合物的抑菌活性、最小杀菌浓度(MBC)和最小抑菌浓度(MIC)。结果表明,味精对大肠杆菌、粘质沙雷氏菌、蜡样芽孢杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌的抑菌区平均值分别为11.8、13.4、15.4和16 mm。研究糖盐以1:1的比例混合对大肠杆菌、蜡样芽孢杆菌、粘质沙雷氏菌和金黄色葡萄球菌的抑制区平均值分别为14.2、15.6、18.2和17 mm。味精对革兰氏阴性菌的平均MIC和MBC分别为37.5和75µg/ml,对革兰氏阳性菌的平均MIC和MBC分别为32.5和65µg/ml。糖盐配比为1:1时,对革兰氏阴性菌的MIC和MBC平均值分别为27.2和55µg/ml。而对革兰氏阳性菌的作用分别为22.5µg/ml和45µg/ml。结果表明,与其余处理相比,鸡肉条处理的细菌总数最高,大肠菌群总数最低。直到贮藏期结束,两种处理均未发现沙门氏菌和大肠杆菌。与其余处理相比,对照鸡条的金黄色葡萄球菌总数、嗜冷细菌总数、酵母和霉菌总数最少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信