Grazing Cover Crops Improved Soil Health in Dryland Cropping Systems

A. Obour, J. Holman, L. Simon, S. Johnson
{"title":"Grazing Cover Crops Improved Soil Health in Dryland Cropping Systems","authors":"A. Obour, J. Holman, L. Simon, S. Johnson","doi":"10.4148/2378-5977.8486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Integrating cover crops (CCs) in dryland crop production in the semiarid central Great Plains (CGP) can provide several ecosystem benefits. However, CC adoption has been slow in the CGP because CCs utilize water that otherwise would be available for the subsequent cash crop. Grazing CCs can provide economic benefits to offset revenue loss associated with decreased crop yields when CCs are grown ahead of a cash crop. Field experiments were conducted from 2015 through 2022 to quantify effects of grazing CCs on soil bulk density, aggregate stability, and chemical properties across western Kansas. At the Kansas State University HB Ranch near Brownell, KS, grazed CCs were compared to non-grazed CCs and fallow in a wheat-sorghum-fallow rotation. The on-farm study evaluated CCs grazed with yearlings or cow-calf pairs compared to non-grazed CCs across seven site-years on producer fields in western Kansas (Alexander and Hays) and central Kansas (Marquette). Averaged across 8 years, hayed and grazed CCs removed 71% and 40%, respectively, of available CC biomass at Brownell. Across on-farm sites, CC residue after grazing averaged 2210 lb/a compared to 3475 lb/a for the non-grazed CCs, representing a 36% decrease in CC biomass with grazing. Grazing days across farms ranged from 25 to 54 days with average daily gain of 1.2 to 3.11 lb/d. Soil characteristics including bulk density, penetration resistance, aggregate size distribution, and mean weight diameter (MWD) of water stable aggregates were not different between grazed and non-grazed CCs. Cover crops tended to increase soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration compared to fallow or initial SOC levels in some site-years. For example, SOC measured at the surface 0-to 2-inch depth near Hays, KS, in spring 2019 was 1.4%, which was significantly less than the 2.1% SOC measured in 2021 after two cycles of grazing CCs at this location. Penetration resistance measured after grazing in 2021 averaged 52.2 and 49.3 psi for the grazed and non-grazed CCs at Marquette, KS. Similarly, penetration resistance averaged 75.4 psi with grazed and non-grazed CCs at Alexander, KS. The penetration resistance measured across locations and CC management strategies was below the threshold of 300 psi that will limit root growth. Based on findings of this study, integrating CCs with livestock can be a strategy for producers to balance profitability and soil health in dryland crop production in western Kansas.","PeriodicalId":17773,"journal":{"name":"Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4148/2378-5977.8486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary Integrating cover crops (CCs) in dryland crop production in the semiarid central Great Plains (CGP) can provide several ecosystem benefits. However, CC adoption has been slow in the CGP because CCs utilize water that otherwise would be available for the subsequent cash crop. Grazing CCs can provide economic benefits to offset revenue loss associated with decreased crop yields when CCs are grown ahead of a cash crop. Field experiments were conducted from 2015 through 2022 to quantify effects of grazing CCs on soil bulk density, aggregate stability, and chemical properties across western Kansas. At the Kansas State University HB Ranch near Brownell, KS, grazed CCs were compared to non-grazed CCs and fallow in a wheat-sorghum-fallow rotation. The on-farm study evaluated CCs grazed with yearlings or cow-calf pairs compared to non-grazed CCs across seven site-years on producer fields in western Kansas (Alexander and Hays) and central Kansas (Marquette). Averaged across 8 years, hayed and grazed CCs removed 71% and 40%, respectively, of available CC biomass at Brownell. Across on-farm sites, CC residue after grazing averaged 2210 lb/a compared to 3475 lb/a for the non-grazed CCs, representing a 36% decrease in CC biomass with grazing. Grazing days across farms ranged from 25 to 54 days with average daily gain of 1.2 to 3.11 lb/d. Soil characteristics including bulk density, penetration resistance, aggregate size distribution, and mean weight diameter (MWD) of water stable aggregates were not different between grazed and non-grazed CCs. Cover crops tended to increase soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration compared to fallow or initial SOC levels in some site-years. For example, SOC measured at the surface 0-to 2-inch depth near Hays, KS, in spring 2019 was 1.4%, which was significantly less than the 2.1% SOC measured in 2021 after two cycles of grazing CCs at this location. Penetration resistance measured after grazing in 2021 averaged 52.2 and 49.3 psi for the grazed and non-grazed CCs at Marquette, KS. Similarly, penetration resistance averaged 75.4 psi with grazed and non-grazed CCs at Alexander, KS. The penetration resistance measured across locations and CC management strategies was below the threshold of 300 psi that will limit root growth. Based on findings of this study, integrating CCs with livestock can be a strategy for producers to balance profitability and soil health in dryland crop production in western Kansas.
放牧覆盖作物改善旱地耕作系统土壤健康
在半干旱的中部大平原地区,将覆盖作物整合到旱地作物生产中可以提供多种生态效益。然而,在CGP中,采用CC的速度很慢,因为CC使用的水本来可以用于后续的经济作物。如果在经济作物之前种植CCs,放牧CCs可以提供经济效益,以抵消因作物产量下降而带来的收入损失。从2015年到2022年进行了实地试验,以量化放牧CCs对堪萨斯州西部土壤容重、团聚体稳定性和化学性质的影响。在堪萨斯州布朗内尔附近的堪萨斯州立大学HB牧场,放牧的CCs与非放牧的CCs和休耕的小麦-高粱-休耕轮作进行了比较。农场研究评估了在堪萨斯州西部(亚历山大和海斯)和堪萨斯州中部(马奎特)七个现场年的生产地里,与一岁畜或小牛对放牧的CCs相比,非放牧的CCs。在8年的平均时间里,放牧和放牧的CCs分别减少了布朗内尔可用CC生物量的71%和40%。放牧后的CC残留量平均为2210 lb/a,而未放牧的CC残留量为3475 lb/a,放牧后的CC生物量减少了36%。各农场放牧天数为25 ~ 54天,平均日增重为1.2 ~ 3.11磅/天。放牧与非放牧土壤中,水稳性团聚体的容重、抗渗透能力、团聚体粒径分布和平均重径(MWD)等土壤特征均无显著差异。在某些立地年,与休耕或初始有机碳水平相比,覆盖作物有增加土壤有机碳浓度的趋势。例如,2019年春季,在KS Hays附近0至2英寸深度的地表测量到的SOC为1.4%,这明显低于该地区两次放牧CCs循环后2021年测量到的2.1% SOC。2021年,在堪萨斯州马奎特,放牧和非放牧CCs的穿透阻力平均为52.2和49.3 psi。同样,在Alexander, KS,放牧和非放牧CCs的穿透阻力平均为75.4 psi。不同位置和CC管理策略测量的穿透阻力均低于300psi的阈值,这将限制根系的生长。根据这项研究的结果,将CCs与牲畜相结合可以成为堪萨斯州西部旱地作物生产中生产者平衡盈利能力和土壤健康的一种策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信