COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and associated factors among the business community in Lira City, Uganda: a cross-sectional research

Q3 Nursing
Eustes Kigongo, Eve Achan, B. Opio, Anne Ruth Akello, Marvin Musinguzi, Raymond Tumwesigye, Amir Kabunga, Sean Steven Puleh
{"title":"COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and associated factors among the business community in Lira City, Uganda: a cross-sectional research","authors":"Eustes Kigongo, Eve Achan, B. Opio, Anne Ruth Akello, Marvin Musinguzi, Raymond Tumwesigye, Amir Kabunga, Sean Steven Puleh","doi":"10.54103/2282-0930/20754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: As of November 26, 2021, at least seven different vaccines across three platforms have been distributed globally. These vaccines include Pfizer/BioNTech released on December 31, 2020, AstraZeneca on February 16, 2021, Janssen by Johnson and Johnson on March 12, 2021, Moderna on April 30, 2021, Sinopharm on May 7, 2021, Sinovac CoronaVac on July 1, 2021, and COVAXIN on November 3, 2021. Despite this unprecedented scientific discovery, vaccine hesitancy is seen as a stumbling block towards achieving herd immunity in the battle to control this global pandemic. The effectiveness of vaccines has been based on the principle that the community was willing to take up the vaccine to achieve herd immunity. This study aimed to assess COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and associated factors among the business community in Lira City, Uganda.Methods: Descriptive cross-sectional design was conducted among the business community from Lira City in Northern Uganda. The sample size was 421, however, only 407 members of the business community who responded were included in the analysis.Results: Of the 407 participants, 57.3% were females, 52.5% were married, 88.4% were Langi by Tribe, 43.5% had tertiary education, 33.4% were Anglicans, and 40.1% were market vendors. Results also show that about 32.3% of the respondents had either delayed or refused to take the COVID-19 vaccine. The correlates of vaccination hesitance were education level (aOR; 3.63, 95%CI; 1.49-8.79, p=0.04), having a chronic medical condition (aOR; 2.7, 95%CI; 1.39-5.38, p=0.04) and certainty in the COVID-19 vaccines (aOR; 0.27, 95%CI; 0.017-0.51, p=0.02). Respondents who had primary level education had a more than 2-fold increased odds of acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination compared to those who had not attained any formal education. Individuals who had chronic medical conditions had more than 2-fold increased odds of accepting the COVID-19 vaccine compared to those who did not have any chronic medical conditions. Those who were certain about the COVID-19 vaccine were 73% less likely to hesitate vaccination as compared to their counterparts who were uncertain. Conclusion: The study found a substantially high level of COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy in Lira City and its predictors were level of education, chronic medical conditions and certainty in COVID-19 vaccines. For this reason, it is important to raise awareness among the business community about the vaccine. To increase uptake, policymakers and other stakeholders need to create effective communication techniques for behavior change.","PeriodicalId":45811,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology Biostatistics and Public Health","volume":"174 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology Biostatistics and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54103/2282-0930/20754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As of November 26, 2021, at least seven different vaccines across three platforms have been distributed globally. These vaccines include Pfizer/BioNTech released on December 31, 2020, AstraZeneca on February 16, 2021, Janssen by Johnson and Johnson on March 12, 2021, Moderna on April 30, 2021, Sinopharm on May 7, 2021, Sinovac CoronaVac on July 1, 2021, and COVAXIN on November 3, 2021. Despite this unprecedented scientific discovery, vaccine hesitancy is seen as a stumbling block towards achieving herd immunity in the battle to control this global pandemic. The effectiveness of vaccines has been based on the principle that the community was willing to take up the vaccine to achieve herd immunity. This study aimed to assess COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and associated factors among the business community in Lira City, Uganda.Methods: Descriptive cross-sectional design was conducted among the business community from Lira City in Northern Uganda. The sample size was 421, however, only 407 members of the business community who responded were included in the analysis.Results: Of the 407 participants, 57.3% were females, 52.5% were married, 88.4% were Langi by Tribe, 43.5% had tertiary education, 33.4% were Anglicans, and 40.1% were market vendors. Results also show that about 32.3% of the respondents had either delayed or refused to take the COVID-19 vaccine. The correlates of vaccination hesitance were education level (aOR; 3.63, 95%CI; 1.49-8.79, p=0.04), having a chronic medical condition (aOR; 2.7, 95%CI; 1.39-5.38, p=0.04) and certainty in the COVID-19 vaccines (aOR; 0.27, 95%CI; 0.017-0.51, p=0.02). Respondents who had primary level education had a more than 2-fold increased odds of acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination compared to those who had not attained any formal education. Individuals who had chronic medical conditions had more than 2-fold increased odds of accepting the COVID-19 vaccine compared to those who did not have any chronic medical conditions. Those who were certain about the COVID-19 vaccine were 73% less likely to hesitate vaccination as compared to their counterparts who were uncertain. Conclusion: The study found a substantially high level of COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy in Lira City and its predictors were level of education, chronic medical conditions and certainty in COVID-19 vaccines. For this reason, it is important to raise awareness among the business community about the vaccine. To increase uptake, policymakers and other stakeholders need to create effective communication techniques for behavior change.
乌干达里拉市商界对COVID-19疫苗接种的犹豫及相关因素:一项横断面研究
背景:截至2021年11月26日,全球已通过三个平台分发了至少七种不同的疫苗。这些疫苗包括2020年12月31日上市的辉瑞/生物科技、2021年2月16日上市的阿斯利康、2021年3月12日上市的强生杨森、2021年4月30日上市的Moderna、2021年5月7日上市的国药控股、2021年7月1日上市的科兴新冠和2021年11月3日上市的COVAXIN。尽管有这一前所未有的科学发现,但在控制这一全球大流行的战斗中,疫苗犹豫被视为实现群体免疫的绊脚石。疫苗的有效性是基于社区愿意接种疫苗以实现群体免疫的原则。本研究旨在评估乌干达里拉市工商界对COVID-19疫苗接种的犹豫及其相关因素。方法:描述性横断面设计在乌干达北部利拉市的商业社区中进行。调查样本量为421人,但只有407名商界人士参与了分析。结果:在407名参与者中,57.3%为女性,52.5%为已婚,88.4%为兰吉族,43.5%为高等教育,33.4%为圣公会教徒,40.1%为市场摊贩。调查结果还显示,约32.3%的受访者推迟或拒绝接种新冠病毒疫苗。疫苗接种犹豫的相关因素为受教育程度(aOR);3.63, 95%可信区间;1.49-8.79, p=0.04),有慢性疾病(aOR;2.7, 95%可信区间;1.39-5.38, p=0.04)和确定性(aOR;0.27, 95%可信区间;0.017 - -0.51, p = 0.02)。接受过初等教育的应答者接受COVID-19疫苗接种的几率比未接受过任何正规教育的应答者高出2倍以上。与没有任何慢性疾病的人相比,患有慢性疾病的人接受COVID-19疫苗的几率增加了两倍以上。与不确定的人相比,那些确定COVID-19疫苗的人犹豫接种疫苗的可能性降低了73%。结论:该研究发现,里拉市的COVID-19疫苗接种犹豫程度相当高,其预测因素是教育水平、慢性疾病和COVID-19疫苗的确定性。因此,必须提高企业界对疫苗的认识。为了提高接受度,政策制定者和其他利益相关者需要为改变行为创造有效的沟通技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epidemiology Biostatistics and Public Health
Epidemiology Biostatistics and Public Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Public Health (EBPH) is a multidisciplinary journal that has two broad aims: -To support the international public health community with publications on health service research, health care management, health policy, and health economics. -To strengthen the evidences on effective preventive interventions. -To advance public health methods, including biostatistics and epidemiology. EBPH welcomes submissions on all public health issues (including topics like eHealth, big data, personalized prevention, epidemiology and risk factors of chronic and infectious diseases); on basic and applied research in epidemiology; and in biostatistics methodology. Primary studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses are all welcome, as are research protocols for observational and experimental studies. EBPH aims to be a cross-discipline, international forum for scientific integration and evidence-based policymaking, combining the methodological aspects of epidemiology, biostatistics, and public health research with their practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信