Consumers, clergy, and clinicians in collaboration: Ongoing implementation and evaluation of a mental wellness program

G. Milstein, D. Middel, Adriana Espinosa
{"title":"Consumers, clergy, and clinicians in collaboration: Ongoing implementation and evaluation of a mental wellness program","authors":"G. Milstein, D. Middel, Adriana Espinosa","doi":"10.1080/15487768.2016.1267052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT As a foundation of most cultures, with roots in persons’ early development, religion can be a source of hope as well as denigration. Some religious institutions have made attempts to help persons with mental health problems, and some mental health professionals have sought to engage religion resources. These programs have rarely been sustained. In 2008, the Mental Health Center of Denver (MHCD) developed a program to assess the utility of religion resources within mental health care. In response to positive feedback, MHCD appointed a director of Faith and Spiritual Wellness who facilitates community outreach to faith communities and spiritual integration training to MHCD staff. This director initiated a Clergy Outreach & Professional Engagement (COPE) conference for consumers, clergy, and clinicians. The goal was to acknowledge borders between parts of persons’ lives, and to build bridges of collaboration to facilitate care. Participants described lived examples of collaboration to improve mental wellness, including the need for a “solid welcome” from congregations. Subsequent, online surveys generated quantitative data on the usefulness of the conference to encourage and to generate ideas for interaction. Each group affirmed the utility of the conference; consumers and clinicians found the conference more useful than clergy. Qualitative assessment confirmed that across culture differences, participants found common language to demonstrate that persons of different traditions can provide care inclusive of religious resources. This assessment concludes with recommendations for future collaboration, led by consumer input, to expand recovery networks.","PeriodicalId":72174,"journal":{"name":"American journal of psychiatric rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of psychiatric rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15487768.2016.1267052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

ABSTRACT As a foundation of most cultures, with roots in persons’ early development, religion can be a source of hope as well as denigration. Some religious institutions have made attempts to help persons with mental health problems, and some mental health professionals have sought to engage religion resources. These programs have rarely been sustained. In 2008, the Mental Health Center of Denver (MHCD) developed a program to assess the utility of religion resources within mental health care. In response to positive feedback, MHCD appointed a director of Faith and Spiritual Wellness who facilitates community outreach to faith communities and spiritual integration training to MHCD staff. This director initiated a Clergy Outreach & Professional Engagement (COPE) conference for consumers, clergy, and clinicians. The goal was to acknowledge borders between parts of persons’ lives, and to build bridges of collaboration to facilitate care. Participants described lived examples of collaboration to improve mental wellness, including the need for a “solid welcome” from congregations. Subsequent, online surveys generated quantitative data on the usefulness of the conference to encourage and to generate ideas for interaction. Each group affirmed the utility of the conference; consumers and clinicians found the conference more useful than clergy. Qualitative assessment confirmed that across culture differences, participants found common language to demonstrate that persons of different traditions can provide care inclusive of religious resources. This assessment concludes with recommendations for future collaboration, led by consumer input, to expand recovery networks.
消费者、神职人员和临床医生的合作:心理健康项目的持续实施和评估
宗教作为大多数文化的基础,根植于人的早期发展,既可以是希望的源泉,也可以是诋毁的源泉。一些宗教机构试图帮助有心理健康问题的人,一些心理健康专业人员也试图利用宗教资源。这些项目很少得到维持。2008年,丹佛心理健康中心(MHCD)制定了一项评估宗教资源在心理健康护理中的效用的计划。为了回应积极的反馈,MHCD任命了一名信仰和精神健康主任,负责促进社区对信仰社区的推广,并为MHCD员工提供精神融合培训。这位主任为消费者、神职人员和临床医生发起了一次神职人员外展和专业参与(COPE)会议。其目标是承认人们生活各部分之间的界限,并建立合作桥梁以促进护理。与会者描述了合作改善心理健康的实例,包括需要来自会众的“热烈欢迎”。随后,在线调查产生了关于会议在鼓励和产生互动想法方面有用性的定量数据。每个小组都肯定了会议的效用;消费者和临床医生认为这次会议比神职人员更有用。定性评估证实,跨越文化差异,参与者发现共同语言表明,不同传统的人可以提供包括宗教资源在内的护理。该评估最后提出了以消费者投入为主导的未来合作建议,以扩大恢复网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信