New Materialisms

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Samuel Diener
{"title":"New Materialisms","authors":"Samuel Diener","doi":"10.1093/ywcct/mbac012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The works reviewed in this year’s essay on the New Materialisms raise questions about the field’s orientation to knowledge creation and to its subjects of study, critiquing universalizing discussions of the Anthropocene, questioning notions of ‘pure’ or ‘pristine’ Nature, and proposing considerations for ethical and scholarly attention. Along the way, they touch on the problems of human ontology, employ the New Materialisms as a method for scholarship across the disciplines and for applied scholarly and creative work, raise the question of the New Materialisms’ political stakes (or lack thereof), and attempt to negotiate relationships between Western academic knowledge-making and other forms and situations of knowledge. Following an overview of these questions in the introduction, the essay is divided into four sections: 1. Utopia Now, focusing on Jayna Brown’s Black Utopias: Speculative Life and the Music of Other Worlds; 2. Clutter Culture, which discusses Rebecca R. Falkoff’s Possessed: A Cultural History of Hoarding; 3. National Dirt, on Mieka Erley’s On Russian Soil: Myth and Materiality; and 4. Cartographies of the Anthropocene, which considers Anna L Tsing, Jennifer Deger, Alder Keleman Saxena, and Feifei Zhou’s multimedia online project Feral Atlas: The More-Than-Human Anthropocene.","PeriodicalId":35040,"journal":{"name":"Year''s Work in Critical and Cultural Theory","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Year''s Work in Critical and Cultural Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ywcct/mbac012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The works reviewed in this year’s essay on the New Materialisms raise questions about the field’s orientation to knowledge creation and to its subjects of study, critiquing universalizing discussions of the Anthropocene, questioning notions of ‘pure’ or ‘pristine’ Nature, and proposing considerations for ethical and scholarly attention. Along the way, they touch on the problems of human ontology, employ the New Materialisms as a method for scholarship across the disciplines and for applied scholarly and creative work, raise the question of the New Materialisms’ political stakes (or lack thereof), and attempt to negotiate relationships between Western academic knowledge-making and other forms and situations of knowledge. Following an overview of these questions in the introduction, the essay is divided into four sections: 1. Utopia Now, focusing on Jayna Brown’s Black Utopias: Speculative Life and the Music of Other Worlds; 2. Clutter Culture, which discusses Rebecca R. Falkoff’s Possessed: A Cultural History of Hoarding; 3. National Dirt, on Mieka Erley’s On Russian Soil: Myth and Materiality; and 4. Cartographies of the Anthropocene, which considers Anna L Tsing, Jennifer Deger, Alder Keleman Saxena, and Feifei Zhou’s multimedia online project Feral Atlas: The More-Than-Human Anthropocene.
在今年的《新唯物主义》文章中回顾的作品提出了关于该领域对知识创造及其研究主题的取向的问题,批评了对人类世的普遍化讨论,质疑了“纯粹”或“原始”自然的概念,并提出了伦理和学术关注的考虑。在此过程中,他们触及了人类本体论的问题,将新唯物主义作为跨学科学术研究和应用学术和创造性工作的一种方法,提出了新唯物主义的政治利害关系(或缺乏政治利害关系)的问题,并试图协商西方学术知识创造与其他形式和知识情境之间的关系。在引言中概述了这些问题之后,本文分为四个部分:1。《现在的乌托邦》——以杰娜·布朗的《黑人乌托邦:思辨生活与其他世界的音乐》为例2. 《杂乱文化》,讨论丽贝卡·r·福尔科夫的《占有:囤积的文化史》;3.。米卡·埃尔利的《俄罗斯土地:神话与物质性》;和4。《人类世的制图》,其中包括Anna L . Tsing、Jennifer Deger、Alder Keleman Saxena和菲菲周菲菲的多媒体在线项目《野生地图集:超越人类的人类世》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Year''s Work in Critical and Cultural Theory
Year''s Work in Critical and Cultural Theory Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信