Comparing the Effects of Lidocaine/Paracetamol and Midazolam/Fentanyl as a Premedication on Pain Intensity and Hemodynamic Changes in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery With Topical Anesthesia: A Randomized Double-blinded Pilot Study

Nasim Zarrin, Marzieh Beigom Khezri, Raheleh Safaei, M. Oladi
{"title":"Comparing the Effects of Lidocaine/Paracetamol and Midazolam/Fentanyl as a Premedication on Pain Intensity and Hemodynamic Changes in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery With Topical Anesthesia: A Randomized Double-blinded Pilot Study","authors":"Nasim Zarrin, Marzieh Beigom Khezri, Raheleh Safaei, M. Oladi","doi":"10.32598/jid.26.2.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Several supplementary approaches have been used to increase the patient’s comfort during phacoemulsification under topical anesthesia. Objective: This study aimed to compare the effects of lidocaine/paracetamol (LP) and midazolam/fentanyl (MF) administration on pain intensity and hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing cataract surgery using phacoemulsification. Methods: This study was designed and implemented as a pilot randomized double-blinded clinical trial. A total number of 80 patients with cataracts scheduled for phacoemulsification were randomly assigned to two groups (40 subjects in each group) to receive lidocaine at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg and then infused with 1 g of paracetamol in 100 cc of normal saline (LP group) or midazolam 0.2 mg/kg and fentanyl 1.5 µg/kg (MF group). Hemodynamic parameters and sedation scores were measured before, 5, and 15 minutes after surgery, and then during recovery. Furthermore, pain (VAS), patient-surgeon satisfaction, propofol, and opioid consumption were all assessed. Findings: The sedation scores during recovery in the LP group were significantly lower (P= 0.04) than those in the MF group. Respiratory depression was also significantly lower (P<0.001) in the LP group compared to that infused by MF. According to other findings, no significant difference was observed between both study groups. Conclusion: The use of lidocaine-paracetamol as a supplementary approach for patients undergoing cataract surgery under topical anesthesia can cause better sedation scores with lower respiratory depression compared to the use of midazolam-fentanyl.","PeriodicalId":91544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of inflammatory bowel diseases & disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of inflammatory bowel diseases & disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/jid.26.2.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several supplementary approaches have been used to increase the patient’s comfort during phacoemulsification under topical anesthesia. Objective: This study aimed to compare the effects of lidocaine/paracetamol (LP) and midazolam/fentanyl (MF) administration on pain intensity and hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing cataract surgery using phacoemulsification. Methods: This study was designed and implemented as a pilot randomized double-blinded clinical trial. A total number of 80 patients with cataracts scheduled for phacoemulsification were randomly assigned to two groups (40 subjects in each group) to receive lidocaine at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg and then infused with 1 g of paracetamol in 100 cc of normal saline (LP group) or midazolam 0.2 mg/kg and fentanyl 1.5 µg/kg (MF group). Hemodynamic parameters and sedation scores were measured before, 5, and 15 minutes after surgery, and then during recovery. Furthermore, pain (VAS), patient-surgeon satisfaction, propofol, and opioid consumption were all assessed. Findings: The sedation scores during recovery in the LP group were significantly lower (P= 0.04) than those in the MF group. Respiratory depression was also significantly lower (P<0.001) in the LP group compared to that infused by MF. According to other findings, no significant difference was observed between both study groups. Conclusion: The use of lidocaine-paracetamol as a supplementary approach for patients undergoing cataract surgery under topical anesthesia can cause better sedation scores with lower respiratory depression compared to the use of midazolam-fentanyl.
比较利多卡因/扑热息痛与咪达唑仑/芬太尼作为预用药对表面麻醉白内障手术患者疼痛强度和血流动力学变化的影响:一项随机双盲试点研究
背景:在表面麻醉下进行超声乳化术时,一些辅助方法被用来增加患者的舒适度。目的:比较利多卡因/扑热息痛(LP)和咪达唑仑/芬太尼(MF)对白内障超声乳化术患者疼痛强度和血流动力学变化的影响。方法:本研究采用随机双盲临床试验设计和实施。选择80例拟行超声乳化术的白内障患者,随机分为两组(每组40例),先给予1.5 mg/kg剂量的利多卡因,然后在100 cc生理盐水中灌注扑热息痛1 g (LP组)或咪达唑仑0.2 mg/kg +芬太尼1.5µg/kg (MF组)。在术前、术后5分钟和15分钟以及恢复期间分别测量血流动力学参数和镇静评分。此外,疼痛(VAS)、患者-外科医生满意度、异丙酚和阿片类药物消耗均被评估。结果:LP组恢复时镇静评分显著低于MF组(P= 0.04)。LP组呼吸抑制明显低于MF组(P<0.001)。根据其他研究结果,两个研究组之间没有观察到显著差异。结论:与咪达唑仑-芬太尼相比,利多卡因-扑热息痛作为表面麻醉下白内障手术患者的辅助用药可获得更好的镇静评分,同时伴有下呼吸抑制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信