Examining the Relation between Race and Student Evaluations of Faculty Members: A Literature Review

D. Williams
{"title":"Examining the Relation between Race and Student Evaluations of Faculty Members: A Literature Review","authors":"D. Williams","doi":"10.1632/PROF.2007.2007.1.168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The assertion that scholarship is limited on the relation between ethnicity and student evaluations of faculty members is perhaps an understatement. While there is a wealth of scholarship on the relation between gender and student evaluations of faculty members, little has been published on how ethnicity (of both faculty members and students) informs students' rat ing of teaching effectiveness. Throughout research into issues specific to minority faculty members there are passing references to the sometimes unfair use of student evaluations to determine faculty tenure, promotion, and merit pay; but these references do not and cannot serve as pertinent scholarship on how a faculty member's ethnic background creates biases that reveal themselves in those evaluations. In one of the few essays that address the relation between ethnicity and evaluation, Heidi J. Nast explores, among other things, \"student re sistances to multicultural teaching and faculty diversity [and] the risks that derive from problematic institutional deployment of student evalua tions as a means of judging multicultural curricular and faculty success\" (103). Nast's essay is especially revealing in the following articulations. First, \"students use evaluations to register anger and disapproval at hav ing to negotiate topics and issues in a scholarly way which conflict with heretofore learned social values and assumptions.\" Second, the likelihood of negative evaluations increases when faculty members \"curricularly ad dress issues of homophobia, racism, classism, misogyny or heterosexism\"","PeriodicalId":86631,"journal":{"name":"The Osteopathic profession","volume":"22 1","pages":"168-173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Osteopathic profession","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1632/PROF.2007.2007.1.168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

The assertion that scholarship is limited on the relation between ethnicity and student evaluations of faculty members is perhaps an understatement. While there is a wealth of scholarship on the relation between gender and student evaluations of faculty members, little has been published on how ethnicity (of both faculty members and students) informs students' rat ing of teaching effectiveness. Throughout research into issues specific to minority faculty members there are passing references to the sometimes unfair use of student evaluations to determine faculty tenure, promotion, and merit pay; but these references do not and cannot serve as pertinent scholarship on how a faculty member's ethnic background creates biases that reveal themselves in those evaluations. In one of the few essays that address the relation between ethnicity and evaluation, Heidi J. Nast explores, among other things, "student re sistances to multicultural teaching and faculty diversity [and] the risks that derive from problematic institutional deployment of student evalua tions as a means of judging multicultural curricular and faculty success" (103). Nast's essay is especially revealing in the following articulations. First, "students use evaluations to register anger and disapproval at hav ing to negotiate topics and issues in a scholarly way which conflict with heretofore learned social values and assumptions." Second, the likelihood of negative evaluations increases when faculty members "curricularly ad dress issues of homophobia, racism, classism, misogyny or heterosexism"
检视种族与学生对教职员评价之关系:文献回顾
断言奖学金受限于种族和学生对教员评价之间的关系,也许是一种轻描淡写。虽然在性别和学生对教师评价之间的关系方面有大量的学术研究,但关于(教师和学生)种族如何影响学生对教学效果的评价的研究却很少。在对少数族裔教职员工具体问题的研究中,有一些人提到,有时不公平地使用学生评估来决定教职员工的任期、晋升和绩效工资;但是,这些参考文献不能也不能作为相关的学术研究,来说明教员的种族背景如何造成了在这些评估中显现出来的偏见。在少数几篇论述种族与评价之间关系的文章中,海蒂·j·纳斯特(Heidi J. Nast)探讨了“学生对多元文化教学和教师多样性的抵制[以及]将学生评价作为评判多元文化课程和教师成功的一种手段的有问题的制度部署所带来的风险”(103)。纳斯特的文章在下面的表述中尤其发人深省。首先,“学生们用评估来表达愤怒和不满,因为他们不得不以一种学术的方式来讨论与迄今为止学到的社会价值观和假设相冲突的话题和问题。”其次,当教职员工“在课程设置和处理同性恋恐惧症、种族主义、阶级歧视、厌女症或异性恋歧视等问题”时,负面评价的可能性会增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信