Analysis of the Governance Frameworks of Public Universities in Tanzania: What is Known and Needs Knowing?

{"title":"Analysis of the Governance Frameworks of Public Universities in Tanzania: What is Known and Needs Knowing?","authors":"","doi":"10.56279/bmrj.v25i1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Little is known about governance frameworks of universities in developing countries. In response, this paper presents content analysis undertaken to review the governance frameworks of public universities in Tanzania, encompassing the Universities Act, 2005, the Universities (General) Regulations, 2013 and the charters of ten public universities. In order to understand the changes that have taken place, individual acts of parliament relating to public universities prior to 2005 are also reviewed. The analysis reveals that changes to universities’ governance frameworks through enactment of the Universities Act, 2005 have substantially increased both the institutional and operational autonomy of public universities. At the country level, the Act established the Tanzania Commission for Universities as a regulatory body and removed the government from direct control of public universities. At the institutional level, the Act allowed the establishment of a council and a senate as the two principal organs of governance primarily responsible for academic, administrative and financial university matters, and authorized the inclusion of both internal and external stakeholders on these two bodies. The governance requirements of the Act are reflected particularly in universities’ charters, with representation of staff, women, students and the private sector. This paper relies on analysis of governance frameworks, so actual governance practices may differ from the documentary evidence, yet this is one of few studies of the governance of higher learning institutions in developing countries, which are less represented in the university governance literature overall.","PeriodicalId":34812,"journal":{"name":"AFEBI Management and Business Review","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AFEBI Management and Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56279/bmrj.v25i1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Little is known about governance frameworks of universities in developing countries. In response, this paper presents content analysis undertaken to review the governance frameworks of public universities in Tanzania, encompassing the Universities Act, 2005, the Universities (General) Regulations, 2013 and the charters of ten public universities. In order to understand the changes that have taken place, individual acts of parliament relating to public universities prior to 2005 are also reviewed. The analysis reveals that changes to universities’ governance frameworks through enactment of the Universities Act, 2005 have substantially increased both the institutional and operational autonomy of public universities. At the country level, the Act established the Tanzania Commission for Universities as a regulatory body and removed the government from direct control of public universities. At the institutional level, the Act allowed the establishment of a council and a senate as the two principal organs of governance primarily responsible for academic, administrative and financial university matters, and authorized the inclusion of both internal and external stakeholders on these two bodies. The governance requirements of the Act are reflected particularly in universities’ charters, with representation of staff, women, students and the private sector. This paper relies on analysis of governance frameworks, so actual governance practices may differ from the documentary evidence, yet this is one of few studies of the governance of higher learning institutions in developing countries, which are less represented in the university governance literature overall.
坦桑尼亚公立大学治理框架分析:已知和需要了解的是什么?
人们对发展中国家的大学治理框架知之甚少。作为回应,本文提出了内容分析,以审查坦桑尼亚公立大学的治理框架,包括2005年《大学法案》、2013年《大学(一般)条例》和十所公立大学的章程。为了了解已经发生的变化,还审查了2005年以前与公立大学有关的个别议会法案。分析表明,通过2005年《大学法案》的颁布,大学治理框架发生了变化,这大大提高了公立大学的机构和运营自主权。在国家一级,该法案设立了坦桑尼亚大学委员会作为一个管理机构,并取消了政府对公立大学的直接控制。在机构一级,该法允许设立一个理事会和一个参议院,作为主要负责大学学术、行政和财务事务的两个主要管理机构,并授权将内部和外部利益相关者纳入这两个机构。该法案的管理要求特别反映在大学的章程中,有工作人员、妇女、学生和私营部门的代表。本文依赖于对治理框架的分析,因此实际的治理实践可能与文献证据有所不同,但这是对发展中国家高等院校治理的少数研究之一,在大学治理文献中,发展中国家的高等院校治理在总体上较少被代表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书