Recherchepraxis bei der Verbesserung von Interferenzfehlern aus dem Italienischen, Portugiesischen und Spanischen: Eine explorative Beobachtungsstudie mit DaF-Lernenden

IF 0.3 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Carolin Müller-Spitzer, Martina Nied Curcio, María José Domínguez Vázquez, Idalete Maria Silva Dias, Sascha Wolfer
{"title":"Recherchepraxis bei der Verbesserung von Interferenzfehlern aus dem Italienischen, Portugiesischen und Spanischen: Eine explorative Beobachtungsstudie mit DaF-Lernenden","authors":"Carolin Müller-Spitzer, Martina Nied Curcio, María José Domínguez Vázquez, Idalete Maria Silva Dias, Sascha Wolfer","doi":"10.1515/LEX-2018-340108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the past two decades, more and more dictionary usage studies have been published, but most of them deal with the question what users appreciate about dictionaries, which dictionaries they use and which information they need in specific situations. These studies presuppose that users indeed consult lexicographic resources. However, language teachers and lecturers of linguistics often have the impression that students use too few high-quality dictionaries in their every-day work. Against this background, we started an international cooperation project to collect empirical data evaluating that impression. Our aim was to evaluate what students (here from the Romance language area) actually do when they correct language problems. We used a new methodological setting to do this (screen recording with a thinking-aloud task). The empirical data we gained offers a broad insight into what language users really do when solving language-related tasks today.","PeriodicalId":29876,"journal":{"name":"LEXICOGRAPHICA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LEXICOGRAPHICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/LEX-2018-340108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In the past two decades, more and more dictionary usage studies have been published, but most of them deal with the question what users appreciate about dictionaries, which dictionaries they use and which information they need in specific situations. These studies presuppose that users indeed consult lexicographic resources. However, language teachers and lecturers of linguistics often have the impression that students use too few high-quality dictionaries in their every-day work. Against this background, we started an international cooperation project to collect empirical data evaluating that impression. Our aim was to evaluate what students (here from the Romance language area) actually do when they correct language problems. We used a new methodological setting to do this (screen recording with a thinking-aloud task). The empirical data we gained offers a broad insight into what language users really do when solving language-related tasks today.
改善意大利语、葡萄牙语和西班牙语间歇性故障研究:这是一项带有daf学员的探索性监控研究
近二十年来,关于词典使用的研究越来越多,但大多数研究都涉及用户对词典的欣赏程度、使用的词典类型以及在特定情况下需要的信息等问题。这些研究假设用户确实查阅了词典编纂资源。然而,语言教师和语言学讲师经常有这样的印象:学生在日常工作中使用的高质量词典太少了。在这种背景下,我们启动了一个国际合作项目,收集评估这种印象的经验数据。我们的目的是评估学生(这里来自罗曼语地区)在纠正语言问题时实际做了什么。我们使用了一种新的方法设置来做到这一点(屏幕记录与出声思考任务)。我们获得的经验数据提供了一个广泛的视角,让我们了解当今语言使用者在解决与语言相关的任务时真正在做什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
LEXICOGRAPHICA
LEXICOGRAPHICA Multiple-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信