Role of loco-regional anesthesia for non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A tertiary care hospital in northern Thailand

Tanyong Pipanmekaporn, P. Leurcharusmee, A. Samerchua, S. Lorsomradee, S. Boonsri, Krit Panjasawatwong, S. Siwachat
{"title":"Role of loco-regional anesthesia for non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A tertiary care hospital in northern Thailand","authors":"Tanyong Pipanmekaporn, P. Leurcharusmee, A. Samerchua, S. Lorsomradee, S. Boonsri, Krit Panjasawatwong, S. Siwachat","doi":"10.54205/ccc.v29i.253960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A few studies have focused on the role of regional anesthesia for non-intubated thoracoscopic surgery (NIVATS) in Thailand. The purpose of the present study was to review the feasibility and safety of loco-regional anesthesia for NIVATS in a tertiary care hospital.\n\nMethods: All patients undergoing scheduled NIVATS under loco-regional anesthesia including thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA), intercostal nerve block (ICNB), thoracic paravertebral block, and local wound infiltration from 2018 to 2021 were assessed by a retrospective chart review. Sedation was performed with propofol infusion and bispectral index monitoring. Primary outcomes were the feasibility of surgery and safety related to loco-regional anesthesia techniques.\n\nResults: Twenty-three patients were included. The average age was 43 (26-59) years. The two most common regional anesthesia techniques in this study were TEA and ICNB. The most common surgical procedure was wedge resection (13 patients, 56.5%) followed by pleurectomy (5 patients, 21.7%). The overall median technical feasible scores were 3 (2-3). Intraoperative hypotension (62.5% for TEA vs 20% for ICNB) and urinary retention (25% for TEA vs 0 for ICNB) were found. Among four patients with severe cough, three patients received intrathoracic vagal block and one patient required general anesthesia due to severe hypoxemia. Patients with ICNB had a higher degree of incisional pain and a higher amount of postoperative morphine consumption. \n\nConclusion: NIVATS under loco-regional anesthesia could be a feasible and safe technique. A further study is recommended to compare the efficacy and safety of TEA and ICNB for NIVATS.","PeriodicalId":76963,"journal":{"name":"AACN clinical issues in critical care nursing","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AACN clinical issues in critical care nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54205/ccc.v29i.253960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A few studies have focused on the role of regional anesthesia for non-intubated thoracoscopic surgery (NIVATS) in Thailand. The purpose of the present study was to review the feasibility and safety of loco-regional anesthesia for NIVATS in a tertiary care hospital. Methods: All patients undergoing scheduled NIVATS under loco-regional anesthesia including thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA), intercostal nerve block (ICNB), thoracic paravertebral block, and local wound infiltration from 2018 to 2021 were assessed by a retrospective chart review. Sedation was performed with propofol infusion and bispectral index monitoring. Primary outcomes were the feasibility of surgery and safety related to loco-regional anesthesia techniques. Results: Twenty-three patients were included. The average age was 43 (26-59) years. The two most common regional anesthesia techniques in this study were TEA and ICNB. The most common surgical procedure was wedge resection (13 patients, 56.5%) followed by pleurectomy (5 patients, 21.7%). The overall median technical feasible scores were 3 (2-3). Intraoperative hypotension (62.5% for TEA vs 20% for ICNB) and urinary retention (25% for TEA vs 0 for ICNB) were found. Among four patients with severe cough, three patients received intrathoracic vagal block and one patient required general anesthesia due to severe hypoxemia. Patients with ICNB had a higher degree of incisional pain and a higher amount of postoperative morphine consumption. Conclusion: NIVATS under loco-regional anesthesia could be a feasible and safe technique. A further study is recommended to compare the efficacy and safety of TEA and ICNB for NIVATS.
局部区域麻醉在非插管电视胸腔镜手术中的作用:泰国北部一家三级护理医院
背景:泰国的一些研究集中在区域麻醉在非插管胸腔镜手术(NIVATS)中的作用。本研究的目的是回顾局部区域麻醉在三级医院NIVATS的可行性和安全性。方法:回顾性分析2018 - 2021年所有在局部区域麻醉下进行NIVATS的患者,包括胸段硬膜外镇痛(TEA)、肋间神经阻滞(ICNB)、胸段椎旁阻滞和局部伤口浸润。镇静采用异丙酚输注和双谱指数监测。主要结果是手术的可行性和与局部区域麻醉技术相关的安全性。结果:纳入23例患者。平均年龄为43岁(26-59岁)。本研究中最常见的两种区域麻醉技术是TEA和ICNB。最常见的手术方式是楔形切除(13例,56.5%),其次是胸膜切除术(5例,21.7%)。总体技术可行性得分中位数为3(2-3)。术中出现低血压(TEA组为62.5%,ICNB组为20%)和尿潴留(TEA组为25%,ICNB组为0%)。在4例严重咳嗽患者中,3例患者行胸内迷走神经阻滞,1例患者因严重低氧血症需要全身麻醉。ICNB患者的切口疼痛程度较高,术后吗啡用量较高。结论:局部区域麻醉下NIVATS是一种安全可行的技术。建议进一步研究比较TEA和ICNB治疗NIVATS的疗效和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信