The War in Ukraine: Implications for the Africa-Europe Peace and Security Partnership

IF 0.3 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Lidet Tadesse Shiferaw, V. Hauck
{"title":"The War in Ukraine: Implications for the Africa-Europe Peace and Security Partnership","authors":"Lidet Tadesse Shiferaw, V. Hauck","doi":"10.35293/srsa.v44i1.4071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the war in Ukraine and what the EU’s increasing preoccupation with it means for the EU-Africa peace and security partnership. It does this from the angle of a new EU funding mechanism, the European Peace Facility (EPF), which is a €5.6 billion fund that came into effect in March 2021 to support conflict management and international security during the EU’s seven-year budget period (2021 to 2027). The facility funds a variety of activities globally and—for the first time in the EU’s history— provides a legal basis for the EU to provide not only technical and material support but also lethal weapons to partner countries. As of May 2022, the EU has pledged to provide €2 billion to support Ukraine’s armed forces aside from the unprecedented economic sanctions the EU has imposed on Russia. The creation of the EPF is inspired by the EU’s ambitious Global Strategy of 2016 (EEAS 2016) and the preceding policy discourse between the EU and its member states on making the EU a “global player” and not just a “global payer”. This shift is partly a response to the emerging international geopolitical order in which the EU feels the need to assert itself and defend its interests globally. This marks a radical paradigm shift in EU foreign policy. The paper argues that the EU’s evolving foreign policy and its unforeseen use of EPF funds in Ukraine have at least two implications for Africa. First, the use of the EPF in Ukraine raises questions about the availability of funds for African peace support operations, which the EU has been supporting for some years. It raises also questions about the way Europe and Africa will decide about funding African security priorities. The EPF allows the transferring of funds and equipment to partner countries or regional coalitions directly, without the need to go through established regional organisations like the AU. Second, the EU’s changing security interests and geopolitical ambitions as well as Africa’s aspirations to find its place in the new global order could alter the dynamics of the EU-Africa peace and security partnership. While the EU remains an important economic and security actor in Africa—at the bilateral and continental levels—the EU-Africa partnership struggles to thrive and go beyond money to live up to its full potential. To meet their own aspirations, the paper argues that the AU and its member states will have to work harder to reduce their financial, security and economic dependence on non-African states. The AU and its member states will also have to avoid getting trapped in geopolitical confrontations between “the east” and “the west”. At the same time, they need to summon the political leadership the continent needs to prevent and manage internal political crises and conflicts on the continent while reducing interference from different international partners.","PeriodicalId":41892,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Review for Southern Africa","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Review for Southern Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35293/srsa.v44i1.4071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper discusses the war in Ukraine and what the EU’s increasing preoccupation with it means for the EU-Africa peace and security partnership. It does this from the angle of a new EU funding mechanism, the European Peace Facility (EPF), which is a €5.6 billion fund that came into effect in March 2021 to support conflict management and international security during the EU’s seven-year budget period (2021 to 2027). The facility funds a variety of activities globally and—for the first time in the EU’s history— provides a legal basis for the EU to provide not only technical and material support but also lethal weapons to partner countries. As of May 2022, the EU has pledged to provide €2 billion to support Ukraine’s armed forces aside from the unprecedented economic sanctions the EU has imposed on Russia. The creation of the EPF is inspired by the EU’s ambitious Global Strategy of 2016 (EEAS 2016) and the preceding policy discourse between the EU and its member states on making the EU a “global player” and not just a “global payer”. This shift is partly a response to the emerging international geopolitical order in which the EU feels the need to assert itself and defend its interests globally. This marks a radical paradigm shift in EU foreign policy. The paper argues that the EU’s evolving foreign policy and its unforeseen use of EPF funds in Ukraine have at least two implications for Africa. First, the use of the EPF in Ukraine raises questions about the availability of funds for African peace support operations, which the EU has been supporting for some years. It raises also questions about the way Europe and Africa will decide about funding African security priorities. The EPF allows the transferring of funds and equipment to partner countries or regional coalitions directly, without the need to go through established regional organisations like the AU. Second, the EU’s changing security interests and geopolitical ambitions as well as Africa’s aspirations to find its place in the new global order could alter the dynamics of the EU-Africa peace and security partnership. While the EU remains an important economic and security actor in Africa—at the bilateral and continental levels—the EU-Africa partnership struggles to thrive and go beyond money to live up to its full potential. To meet their own aspirations, the paper argues that the AU and its member states will have to work harder to reduce their financial, security and economic dependence on non-African states. The AU and its member states will also have to avoid getting trapped in geopolitical confrontations between “the east” and “the west”. At the same time, they need to summon the political leadership the continent needs to prevent and manage internal political crises and conflicts on the continent while reducing interference from different international partners.
乌克兰战争:对非洲-欧洲和平与安全伙伴关系的影响
本文讨论了乌克兰战争,以及欧盟日益关注乌克兰战争对欧盟-非洲和平与安全伙伴关系的意义。这是从一个新的欧盟资助机制——欧洲和平基金(EPF)的角度来实现的,这是一个56亿欧元的基金,于2021年3月生效,用于在欧盟七年预算期间(2021年至2027年)支持冲突管理和国际安全。该设施为全球各种活动提供资金,并在欧盟历史上首次为欧盟不仅提供技术和物质支持,而且向伙伴国家提供致命武器提供法律依据。截至2022年5月,除了欧盟对俄罗斯实施前所未有的经济制裁外,欧盟已承诺提供20亿欧元支持乌克兰武装部队。EPF的创建受到欧盟雄心勃勃的2016年全球战略(EEAS 2016)以及欧盟与其成员国之间关于使欧盟成为“全球参与者”而不仅仅是“全球支付者”的政策话语的启发。这种转变在一定程度上是对正在形成的国际地缘政治秩序的回应,在这种秩序中,欧盟感到有必要在全球范围内维护自己的利益。这标志着欧盟外交政策的根本性转变。本文认为,欧盟不断演变的外交政策及其在乌克兰不可预见地使用EPF资金对非洲至少有两个影响。首先,紧急方案基金在乌克兰的使用引发了对非洲和平支持行动资金可用性的质疑,欧盟多年来一直支持非洲和平支持行动。它还提出了欧洲和非洲将如何决定为非洲安全优先事项提供资金的问题。紧急方案基金允许直接向伙伴国或区域联盟转移资金和设备,而不需要通过非盟等已建立的区域组织。其次,欧盟不断变化的安全利益和地缘政治野心,以及非洲在新的全球秩序中找到自己位置的愿望,可能会改变欧盟-非洲和平与安全伙伴关系的动态。尽管欧盟在双边和大陆层面上仍是非洲重要的经济和安全角色,但欧盟与非洲的伙伴关系仍在努力茁壮成长,并超越金钱层面,充分发挥其潜力。文章认为,为了实现自己的愿望,非盟及其成员国必须更加努力地减少对非洲以外国家在金融、安全和经济方面的依赖。非盟及其成员国还必须避免陷入“东方”与“西方”之间的地缘政治对抗。与此同时,他们需要召集非洲大陆所需的政治领导,以防止和管理非洲大陆的内部政治危机和冲突,同时减少来自不同国际伙伴的干涉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信