Can the Memory of a Historical Uprising Reduce Transitional Uncertainty?: A Comparative Study of Hungary and the Former Soviet Union

Q2 Social Sciences
Gergana Yankova
{"title":"Can the Memory of a Historical Uprising Reduce Transitional Uncertainty?: A Comparative Study of Hungary and the Former Soviet Union","authors":"Gergana Yankova","doi":"10.3200/DEMO.16.2.183-200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The author explores how incumbents form their preferences when regime types change. The author juxtaposes the perceptions of the Hungarian and the Soviet Communist Party hard-liners during the transition from Communism in 1989-91. During this time, the memory of a historical uprising reduced the incumbents' misperceptions about their popular legitimacy via two mechanisms. First, historical memory functioned as a \"public tolerance indicator\" because it brought the opposition together and demonstrated the true distribution of political support. Second, the memory of a past uprising served as a \"conservative reformer\" when it opened up internal party debate about the legitimacy of the regime. The author's argument contributes to the scarce literature on actors' preferences formation under conditions of transitional uncertainty. It also provides a useful analytical bridge between actor-oriented and system-centered approaches to democratization. Keywords: historical memory, Hungary, political legitimacy, post-Communist transition, public opinion, Russia ********** Political actors form their preferences on the basis of their perceptions about their public support. As the Soviet Union began to dissolve in 1989, however, the true extent of the public support for the Communist incumbents in satellite states such as Hungary was unknown because Communist regimes did not hold contested elections. Transitional uncertainty also arose from the undefined institutional rules, the fluid party structure and the unknown reaction of the Soviet Union. Incumbents dealt with uncertainty in different ways. Some party members underestimated the importance and extent of their political legitimacy. These hard-liners stubbornly clung to the old order. Other Communist leaders appreciated the true scale of societal changes, along with the limitations of their power, early on. These politicians took timely steps to democratize and compromise with the opposition. The variance of the incumbents' preferences constitutes a puzzle. Earlier scholarship on democratic transitions has generally treated perceptions as exogenous, leaving the reasons for the disaccord largely unexamined. This study elucidates the development of actors' preferences during transitional periods. The historical memory of a failed antiregime uprising can reduce the incumbents' uncertainty about their political legitimacy by providing those in power with a barometer of public dissatisfaction. Two mechanisms are at work. First, the historical memory of a popular insurrection opens up a debate about the party's legitimacy. During the debate, the more progressive party members criticize the conservative members for their role in defeating the popular uprising. The conservative members then resign, and the party reforms and democratizes. Second, commemorations of past uprisings reveal the strength of the opposition and show the regime's limited public support. The rulers realize that the likelihood of preserving the status quo has decreased and that the only way to preserve power is to associate with the popular historical symbols. As the demonstrations commemorating historical heroes increase, the hard-liners who hoped to embrace the progressive ideas only in words discover they need to back their new image with reforms and compromises. In this article, I revisit the theoretical discussion about the nature of transitional uncertainty and the process of preference formation. I then specify how historical memory can impact the incumbents' perceptions about their legitimacy under conditions of uncertainty. Next, I position the argument within the scholarship of democratic transition and suggest that the proposition connects structural and actor-oriented explanations of regime change. In the first empirical part, I distinguish five episodes in which the memory of the 1956 uprising informed and moderated the incumbents' perceptions in Hungary: the fall of Janos Kadar, the rise of Karoly Grosz, the interview of Imre Poszgay, the demonstrations of March 15, and the reburial of Imre Nagy. …","PeriodicalId":39667,"journal":{"name":"Demokratizatsiya","volume":"39 1","pages":"183-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Demokratizatsiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3200/DEMO.16.2.183-200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The author explores how incumbents form their preferences when regime types change. The author juxtaposes the perceptions of the Hungarian and the Soviet Communist Party hard-liners during the transition from Communism in 1989-91. During this time, the memory of a historical uprising reduced the incumbents' misperceptions about their popular legitimacy via two mechanisms. First, historical memory functioned as a "public tolerance indicator" because it brought the opposition together and demonstrated the true distribution of political support. Second, the memory of a past uprising served as a "conservative reformer" when it opened up internal party debate about the legitimacy of the regime. The author's argument contributes to the scarce literature on actors' preferences formation under conditions of transitional uncertainty. It also provides a useful analytical bridge between actor-oriented and system-centered approaches to democratization. Keywords: historical memory, Hungary, political legitimacy, post-Communist transition, public opinion, Russia ********** Political actors form their preferences on the basis of their perceptions about their public support. As the Soviet Union began to dissolve in 1989, however, the true extent of the public support for the Communist incumbents in satellite states such as Hungary was unknown because Communist regimes did not hold contested elections. Transitional uncertainty also arose from the undefined institutional rules, the fluid party structure and the unknown reaction of the Soviet Union. Incumbents dealt with uncertainty in different ways. Some party members underestimated the importance and extent of their political legitimacy. These hard-liners stubbornly clung to the old order. Other Communist leaders appreciated the true scale of societal changes, along with the limitations of their power, early on. These politicians took timely steps to democratize and compromise with the opposition. The variance of the incumbents' preferences constitutes a puzzle. Earlier scholarship on democratic transitions has generally treated perceptions as exogenous, leaving the reasons for the disaccord largely unexamined. This study elucidates the development of actors' preferences during transitional periods. The historical memory of a failed antiregime uprising can reduce the incumbents' uncertainty about their political legitimacy by providing those in power with a barometer of public dissatisfaction. Two mechanisms are at work. First, the historical memory of a popular insurrection opens up a debate about the party's legitimacy. During the debate, the more progressive party members criticize the conservative members for their role in defeating the popular uprising. The conservative members then resign, and the party reforms and democratizes. Second, commemorations of past uprisings reveal the strength of the opposition and show the regime's limited public support. The rulers realize that the likelihood of preserving the status quo has decreased and that the only way to preserve power is to associate with the popular historical symbols. As the demonstrations commemorating historical heroes increase, the hard-liners who hoped to embrace the progressive ideas only in words discover they need to back their new image with reforms and compromises. In this article, I revisit the theoretical discussion about the nature of transitional uncertainty and the process of preference formation. I then specify how historical memory can impact the incumbents' perceptions about their legitimacy under conditions of uncertainty. Next, I position the argument within the scholarship of democratic transition and suggest that the proposition connects structural and actor-oriented explanations of regime change. In the first empirical part, I distinguish five episodes in which the memory of the 1956 uprising informed and moderated the incumbents' perceptions in Hungary: the fall of Janos Kadar, the rise of Karoly Grosz, the interview of Imre Poszgay, the demonstrations of March 15, and the reburial of Imre Nagy. …
历史起义的记忆能减少过渡时期的不确定性吗?:匈牙利与前苏联比较研究
摘要:本文探讨在位者在制度类型变化时如何形成偏好。作者将匈牙利和苏联共产党强硬派在1989-91年从共产主义过渡期间的看法并列。在此期间,历史起义的记忆通过两种机制减少了现任者对其民众合法性的误解。首先,历史记忆发挥了“公众容忍度指标”的作用,因为它将反对派聚集在一起,展示了政治支持的真实分布。其次,对过去起义的记忆起到了“保守改革者”的作用,它开启了党内关于政权合法性的辩论。作者的观点有助于弥补关于过渡不确定性条件下行为者偏好形成的文献缺失。它还在面向行动者和以制度为中心的民主化方法之间提供了有用的分析桥梁。关键词:历史记忆,匈牙利,政治合法性,后共产主义转型,公众舆论,俄罗斯**********政治行为者根据他们对公众支持的看法形成他们的偏好。然而,随着苏联于1989年开始解体,在匈牙利等卫星国,公众对共产党现任者的真正支持程度并不为人所知,因为共产党政权没有举行有争议的选举。转型的不确定性还来自于不明确的制度规则、不稳定的政党结构和不确定的苏联反应。在职者以不同的方式处理不确定性。一些党员低估了他们政治合法性的重要性和程度。这些强硬派顽固地坚持旧秩序。其他共产党领导人很早就意识到社会变化的真正规模,以及他们权力的局限性。这些政治家及时采取措施实现民主化,并与反对派妥协。在任者偏好的差异构成了一个谜。早期关于民主转型的学术研究通常将感知视为外生的,导致这种不一致的原因在很大程度上没有得到研究。本研究阐明了转型期行为者偏好的发展。反政府起义失败的历史记忆可以为当权者提供公众不满的晴雨表,从而减少当权者对其政治合法性的不确定性。有两种机制在起作用。首先,一场民众起义的历史记忆引发了一场关于共产党合法性的辩论。在辩论中,进步派批评了保守派在镇压起义中扮演的角色。保守党成员随后辞职,该党进行改革和民主化。其次,对过去起义的纪念揭示了反对派的力量,并显示出该政权有限的公众支持。统治者们意识到,维持现状的可能性已经降低,维持权力的唯一途径是与流行的历史符号联系在一起。随着纪念历史英雄的示威活动的增加,那些希望只在口头上接受进步思想的强硬派发现,他们需要用改革和妥协来支持自己的新形象。在这篇文章中,我重新审视了关于过渡不确定性的本质和偏好形成过程的理论讨论。然后,我详细说明了在不确定的条件下,历史记忆如何影响现任者对其合法性的看法。接下来,我将这一论点置于民主转型的学术研究中,并建议这一命题将对政权更迭的结构性解释和以行为者为导向的解释联系起来。在第一个实证部分,我区分了1956年起义的记忆影响并缓和了匈牙利当政者的看法的五个事件:Janos Kadar的倒台,Karoly Grosz的崛起,Imre Poszgay的采访,3月15日的示威游行,以及Imre Nagy的重新埋葬。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Demokratizatsiya
Demokratizatsiya Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Occupying a unique niche among literary journals, ANQ is filled with short, incisive research-based articles about the literature of the English-speaking world and the language of literature. Contributors unravel obscure allusions, explain sources and analogues, and supply variant manuscript readings. Also included are Old English word studies, textual emendations, and rare correspondence from neglected archives. The journal is an essential source for professors and students, as well as archivists, bibliographers, biographers, editors, lexicographers, and textual scholars. With subjects from Chaucer and Milton to Fitzgerald and Welty, ANQ delves into the heart of literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信