The practice of incident reporting and management: current challenges and opportunities for mental health trusts in England

David Wood, C. Robinson, R. Nathan, R. McPhillips
{"title":"The practice of incident reporting and management: current challenges and opportunities for mental health trusts in England","authors":"David Wood, C. Robinson, R. Nathan, R. McPhillips","doi":"10.1108/jmhtep-05-2022-0038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nNew patient safety frameworks are being implemented to improve the impact of incident reporting and management across the National Health Service (NHS) in England. This study aims to examine the current practices in this domain of patient safety in a sample of mental health trusts, a setting in which limitations in the current practice of serious incident management have been reported. The authors present key recommendations to maximise the opportunities to improve current incident reporting and management practice.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nEthical approval for the study was granted. A Web-based questionnaire was designed to examine current practices concerning incident reporting and management. It was refined based on consultation. Patient safety incident managers within mental health trusts in England were recruited. Twenty-nine mental health trusts responded, from a total of 51. The questionnaire study data were analysed in Statistical Package for the Social Sciences.\n\n\nFindings\nCurrent approaches used to report and manage incidents have been established and variation in practice demonstrated. A key finding for attention is that the training and education that investigators of serious incidents receive falls short of the recommended minimum national standard of 15 h, with a sample mean of 10.3 h and median of 8.0 h.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nRecommendations at a local and national level are presented, which, if implemented, can maximise the impact of incident reporting and management practices in mental health trusts. Future qualitative research is indicated, to understand the perceptual experience and meaning behind the findings across a wider group of stakeholders.\n","PeriodicalId":75090,"journal":{"name":"The journal of mental health training, education, and practice","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of mental health training, education, and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmhtep-05-2022-0038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose New patient safety frameworks are being implemented to improve the impact of incident reporting and management across the National Health Service (NHS) in England. This study aims to examine the current practices in this domain of patient safety in a sample of mental health trusts, a setting in which limitations in the current practice of serious incident management have been reported. The authors present key recommendations to maximise the opportunities to improve current incident reporting and management practice. Design/methodology/approach Ethical approval for the study was granted. A Web-based questionnaire was designed to examine current practices concerning incident reporting and management. It was refined based on consultation. Patient safety incident managers within mental health trusts in England were recruited. Twenty-nine mental health trusts responded, from a total of 51. The questionnaire study data were analysed in Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Findings Current approaches used to report and manage incidents have been established and variation in practice demonstrated. A key finding for attention is that the training and education that investigators of serious incidents receive falls short of the recommended minimum national standard of 15 h, with a sample mean of 10.3 h and median of 8.0 h. Originality/value Recommendations at a local and national level are presented, which, if implemented, can maximise the impact of incident reporting and management practices in mental health trusts. Future qualitative research is indicated, to understand the perceptual experience and meaning behind the findings across a wider group of stakeholders.
事件报告和管理的实践:当前的挑战和机遇的精神卫生信托在英格兰
目的正在实施新的患者安全框架,以改善整个英格兰国家医疗服务体系(NHS)事件报告和管理的影响。本研究旨在检查在精神卫生信托样本患者安全这一领域的当前做法,其中严重事件管理的当前实践的局限性已被报道的设置。作者提出了主要建议,以最大限度地提高目前的事件报告和管理实践的机会。设计/方法学/方法本研究已获批准。设计了一份基于网络的调查问卷,以检查有关事件报告和管理的当前做法。它是在协商的基础上改进的。招募了英格兰心理健康信托基金内的患者安全事件管理人员。共有51家心理健康信托机构回应了29家。问卷调查的研究数据在《社会科学统计包》中进行了分析。目前用于报告和管理事件的方法已经建立,实践中也存在差异。值得注意的一个关键发现是,严重事件调查人员接受的培训和教育没有达到建议的最低15小时的国家标准,样本平均值为10.3小时,中位数为8.0小时。提出了地方和国家一级的独创性/价值建议,如果实施这些建议,可以最大限度地发挥精神卫生信托机构事件报告和管理做法的影响。指出了未来的定性研究,以了解在更广泛的利益相关者群体中发现的感知经验和意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信