LB5 Is the duration of the preceding inter-pregnancy interval associated with offspring’s size at birth? – analysis of a UK population-based cohort

N. Ziauddeen, PJ Roderick, NS Macklon, NA Alwan
{"title":"LB5 Is the duration of the preceding inter-pregnancy interval associated with offspring’s size at birth? – analysis of a UK population-based cohort","authors":"N. Ziauddeen, PJ Roderick, NS Macklon, NA Alwan","doi":"10.1136/jech-2018-SSMabstracts.89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Short and long intervals between pregnancies have been associated with increased risk of adverse birth outcomes including low birth weight and stillbirth. Birthweight is an indicator of the in-utero environment and a key early life risk factor for long-term health outcomes such as obesity and cardiovascular disease. The World Health Organization recommended in 2005 waiting at least 24 months after a live birth before getting pregnant again. There are no UK guidelines on birth spacing. We aimed to investigate the association between duration of the inter-pregnancy interval between successive live birth pregnancies and risk of having a small-for-gestational age (SGA) or large-for-gestational age (LGA) baby. Methods A population-based cohort of prospectively collected routine healthcare data for antenatal care between January 2003 and September 2017 (total n=82 098 pregnancies) at University Hospital Southampton, Hampshire, UK was used. Records of women with their first two singleton live-birth pregnancies were analysed (n=15 922 women). Inter-pregnancy interval was defined as timing between a live birth and the next conception. SGA was defined as <10th percentile weight and LGA as >90th percentile weight for gestational age. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between risk of SGA or LGA and inter-pregnancy interval. The models were adjusted for maternal age, ethnicity, highest educational qualification, employment status, baseline maternal BMI, between pregnancy change in maternal BMI, smoking status at second pregnancy booking appointment and conception following infertility treatment. Sensitivity analyses was conducted adjusting for SGA or LGA in previous pregnancies. Results Twelve percent of first pregnancy and 7% of second pregnancy births were SGA. Seven percent of first pregnancy and 13% of second pregnancy births were LGA. Three percent of women each had SGA and LGA babies in both pregnancies. Compared to an interval of 24–35 months, there was a lower risk of SGA birth in second pregnancy with an interval of 12–23 months (adjusted OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.98, p=0.03). The association remained after adjusting for previous outcome of SGA in sensitivity analysis. No association was observed between risk of SGA with intervals of <12 or ≥36 months or LGA and inter-pregnancy interval. Conclusion An inter-pregnancy interval of 12–23 months was associated with lower risk of SGA, however the duration of the interval was not associated with LGA risk. In high-income countries with relatively healthy pregnant population, further research considering the potential advantages of shorter optimal interval between pregnancies than that recommended by WHO is needed. Acknowledgements David Cable (Electronic Patient Records Implementation and Service Manager) at University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust for support in accessing the data used in this study.","PeriodicalId":15778,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health","volume":"37 1","pages":"A43–A44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2018-SSMabstracts.89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background Short and long intervals between pregnancies have been associated with increased risk of adverse birth outcomes including low birth weight and stillbirth. Birthweight is an indicator of the in-utero environment and a key early life risk factor for long-term health outcomes such as obesity and cardiovascular disease. The World Health Organization recommended in 2005 waiting at least 24 months after a live birth before getting pregnant again. There are no UK guidelines on birth spacing. We aimed to investigate the association between duration of the inter-pregnancy interval between successive live birth pregnancies and risk of having a small-for-gestational age (SGA) or large-for-gestational age (LGA) baby. Methods A population-based cohort of prospectively collected routine healthcare data for antenatal care between January 2003 and September 2017 (total n=82 098 pregnancies) at University Hospital Southampton, Hampshire, UK was used. Records of women with their first two singleton live-birth pregnancies were analysed (n=15 922 women). Inter-pregnancy interval was defined as timing between a live birth and the next conception. SGA was defined as <10th percentile weight and LGA as >90th percentile weight for gestational age. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between risk of SGA or LGA and inter-pregnancy interval. The models were adjusted for maternal age, ethnicity, highest educational qualification, employment status, baseline maternal BMI, between pregnancy change in maternal BMI, smoking status at second pregnancy booking appointment and conception following infertility treatment. Sensitivity analyses was conducted adjusting for SGA or LGA in previous pregnancies. Results Twelve percent of first pregnancy and 7% of second pregnancy births were SGA. Seven percent of first pregnancy and 13% of second pregnancy births were LGA. Three percent of women each had SGA and LGA babies in both pregnancies. Compared to an interval of 24–35 months, there was a lower risk of SGA birth in second pregnancy with an interval of 12–23 months (adjusted OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.98, p=0.03). The association remained after adjusting for previous outcome of SGA in sensitivity analysis. No association was observed between risk of SGA with intervals of <12 or ≥36 months or LGA and inter-pregnancy interval. Conclusion An inter-pregnancy interval of 12–23 months was associated with lower risk of SGA, however the duration of the interval was not associated with LGA risk. In high-income countries with relatively healthy pregnant population, further research considering the potential advantages of shorter optimal interval between pregnancies than that recommended by WHO is needed. Acknowledgements David Cable (Electronic Patient Records Implementation and Service Manager) at University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust for support in accessing the data used in this study.
LB5前两次妊娠间隔的持续时间与后代出生时的体型有关吗?-基于英国人群的队列分析
背景:怀孕间隔时间的长短与不良出生结局的风险增加有关,包括低出生体重和死胎。出生体重是宫内环境的一个指标,也是肥胖和心血管疾病等长期健康结果的一个关键早期生命风险因素。2005年,世界卫生组织建议在活产后至少等待24个月再怀孕。英国没有关于生育间隔的指导方针。我们的目的是调查连续活产妊娠之间的妊娠间隔时间与小胎龄(SGA)或大胎龄(LGA)婴儿的风险之间的关系。方法采用以人群为基础的队列研究,前瞻性收集2003年1月至2017年9月英国汉普郡南安普顿大学医院产前保健常规数据(总n= 82098例妊娠)。分析了前两次单胎活产妊娠妇女的记录(n= 15922名妇女)。妊娠间隔被定义为活产和下一次受孕之间的时间间隔。SGA定义为胎龄第90百分位体重。采用Logistic回归分析SGA或LGA风险与妊娠间期的关系。根据产妇的年龄、种族、最高教育程度、就业状况、基线产妇体重指数、怀孕期间产妇体重指数的变化、第二次怀孕预约时的吸烟状况和不孕症治疗后的受孕情况对模型进行了调整。对既往妊娠的SGA或LGA进行敏感性分析。结果首次妊娠占12%,第二次妊娠占7%。7%的第一次怀孕和13%的第二次怀孕是LGA。3%的女性在两次怀孕中都有SGA和LGA宝宝。与间隔24-35个月相比,间隔12-23个月的第二次妊娠发生SGA的风险较低(校正OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69 ~ 0.98, p=0.03)。在敏感性分析中调整了SGA之前的结果后,这种关联仍然存在。妊娠期<12个月或≥36个月的SGA风险与妊娠期间隔无相关性。结论妊娠间隔12 ~ 23个月可降低SGA发生风险,但妊娠间隔时间与LGA发生风险无相关性。在怀孕人口相对健康的高收入国家,需要进一步研究考虑到比世卫组织建议的最佳怀孕间隔更短的潜在优势。感谢南安普顿大学医院NHS基金会信托基金的David Cable(电子病历实施和服务经理)在访问本研究中使用的数据方面提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信